ME 403N

PRODUCTION, PLANNING and CONTROL

Rounded Rectangle: Notes by:
·	Manu Kr. Jain     (99276)
·	Rahul Kr. Mehra (99290)
 

 


Lecture notes for:

EOQ model with shortages permitted

 

Date : 27th Sept 2002

 

 

Considering the Economic Order Policy (EOQ) model, when the shortages are permitted.

 

Assumptions:

Ψ      Demand is known with certainty and is fixed at λ units / time.

Ψ      Lead time for delivery is instantaneous.

Ψ      No time discounting of money is there.

Ψ      Costs involved are,       k = Ordering cost (fixed cost / order)

                                                h = Inventory holding cost / unit held / time

                                                p = Back ordering cost / unit / time

                                                C = purchase cost / unit

 

(Note that,

Ψ      Advantages of allowing shortages :

·        Cycle time increases and hence, per unit ordering cost decreases.

·        Inventory reduces.

Ψ      Disadvantages of allowing shortages :

·        One looses on customer satisfaction and hence

·        Future sales decrease )

 

 

Plot of inventory at any time Vs time:

 

    I(t)

 

 


           

  Q       S

 

                                                                                                                                        time

 

 


                        Q / λ

 

Where,             X axis: t = Time

Y axis: I (t) = Inventory at time, t

 

Here,                Q = Quantity ordered

                        S = Amount of inventory left after back logging

                        λ = Deterministic constant demand

 

In such kind of model, one needs to decide:

  1. How much to order (Q)? and
  2. When to order? (Earlier this decision was fixed, because the demand was fixed and no backlogging/shortages were allowed.)

This decision will in turn decide the amount of “S”, left after back logging.

 

S and Q are independent of each other and S can take any value, independent of value of Q.

 

 

Cost / Cycle     = (Purchase cost / Cycle) + (Fixed cost / order) + (Inventory holding cost)

   + (Back ordering cost)

Cost / Cycle     = {C * Q} + k + {(1/2 * S * S / λ) * h} + {p * (Q – S)2 / (2 * λ)}      ….. (i)

Time / Cycle     = Q / λ                                                                                                 ….. (ii)

Cost / time        = (Cost / Cycle) / (Time / Cycle)

Cost / time        = λ * C + k * λ / Q + 0.5 * h * S2 / Q + 0.5 * p * (Q – S)2 / Q

 

 
 

 

 


The Optimal point: Minimum cost / time

Differentiating the above equation, w.r.t S & Q and solving, we get the Optimal point as:

 

Optimal S:                    S* = (2 * k * λ / h)1/2 * (p / (p + h) )1/2

 

Optimal Q:                   Q* = (2 * k * λ / h)1/2 * ((p + h) / p )1/2

 

Optimal time:                t* = Q* / λ = (2 * k / (λ * h))1/2 * ((p + h) / p )1/2

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 


As we allow back ordering,

 

 


Example: The company that has to store 3 items, has a warehouse of, with total space of warehouse = L. How much quantity of each item should be stored, so as to minimize the cost associated?

 

Solution: Here, one additional constraint has been added                       Total space = L

 

Assuming that no shortages are permitted,

Cost / time = Σ (( hi * Qi / 2) + (ki * λi / Qi ))                                       ….. (i)

{Summing over i = 1 to3}

 

One can not order more than L, so        Q1 + Q2 + Q3 ≤ L                                         ….. (ii)

 

Method 1:

If NO               Do additional mathematics to get Q1*, Q2* and Q3* that satisfy

equation (ii).

 

Method 2:

 

Σ (2 * ki * λi / (hi + 2 * λ))1/2 = L

 

ό      If λ = 0, violation of constraints

ό      So increase the value of λ, such that the constraint is exactly followed.

Qi* = (2 * ki * λi / (hi + 2 * λ))1/2

 
 


                                                                                                            Answer.

 

This is a non-linear programming problem, as the 2nd term in the equation (i) is non linear. But as this is a convex-bowl shaped problem, one is able to solve it.

cost

 
 

 

 

 

 

 


                                                            Optimal point

 

 

 

Quantity

 
 

 


                           Q <= L

One has to order

in this region

 
 



Wagnen – Whitin model:       Model with deterministic time varying demand.

 


The demand is no longer constant, it changes with time, but it is still deterministic.

 

Here

ό      (r1, r2, r3, r4 ………. rn) be the known requirements for a single product over “n” periods.

ό      (y1, y2, y3, y4 ………. yn) be the amounts produced in the respective years.

ό      Lead times are deterministic

Hence the difference between total production and consumption gives the Inventory level at that time.

 

Assumptions:

Ψ      Shortages are not permitted

Ψ      Starting Inventory = 0

Ψ      Linear cost of holding are present

Holding costs                  ht (xt) 

Where, xt is inventory at any time t.

Ψ      Fixed costs are present

Fixed cost / unit              ct (yt)

            Where, yt is amount produced at any time t.

 

 

So the objective is to minimize cost

Cost = Σ (ct (yt) + ht (xt))          {Summing over t = 1 to n}

 

Such that, inventory level:                     

·        xt = Σ (yj – rj)                     {Summing over j = 1 to t}

·        xt => 0                               t = 1,2,3……..n

·        x0 = 0                                 {assumed}

 

Taking ht (xt) to be linear (concave)

                        ht (xt) = ht * xt

 

Taking ct (yt) to be concave

                        ct (yt)    = k + ct * yt                              if yt  > 0

                                    = 0                                           if yt = 0

 

Result: An optimal ordering policy is developed that has a property

 

yt  * xt-1 = 0

 
 


                                                                                    For t = 1,2,3,……….n

 

Note that, if inventory   0 < xt  < rt+1

Then one can have a better solution by having

·        xt  = 0

i.e. producing more during early stage, so as to get inventory at end of t = 0

·        xt  = rt+1 

i.e. producing less during early stage, so as to leave inventory equal to demand in next period.

 

yt  = 0, rt , rt + rt+1, rt  + rt+1 + rt+2 , ……………………., rt  + rt+1 +…………….. + rt+1

 
 

 

 


Or in other words we have to find the shortest distance between different points. This shortest distance between two points will be the feasible solution.

 

(to be continued in next lecture……..)

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1