Writing Workshop
Essay # 1
(Nov. 6, 2003, in response to http://www.nytimes.com/learning/teachers/featured_articles/19981103tuesday.html)
An [i1]increasing number of Americans feels [i2]betrayed how [i3]their political will is represented.
Many potential voters stay at home to protest against the feeling of inertia. I disagree with
these people because a political system like democracy can only work appropriately if everybody
gets involved.
Democracy means by definition that the people govern.
More specifically, in most democracies people agree that every man is
represented equally, that is, one man has one vote. Secondly, a large
percentage of the population is
qualified to vote. Only a few are kept [i4]from the polls. These non-voters are
not discriminated
arbitrarily but in accordance with certain requirements, for example,
citizenship. Thirdly, there is some kind of majority rule. Everyone agrees that
if a certain quorum
is reached, a new government is
formed[i5]. From this definition [i6]let us now look at weaknesses of democratic system. The essay should, thus, reveal why everybody has
to go to elections[i7].
The key issue in democracies is equal representation of all members of a
society. If only one person denies
the vote although he or she is qualified, it would distort equal representation because the majority party is always calculated as the
percentage of all eligible voters[i8]. The problem
becomes clearer when
looked at a larger number of non-voters. Assumed that half of all eligible voters would not
go to elections,
then a new government would be formed that represents only half of the
population. Provided the
fact that the other half does not differ essentially in its political
views, it would not
be problematic.
The real problem arises if
minorities and radicals become
organized. They tend to be passionate voters of extremist parties. Since all of
them vote and half of the moderate middle class stay away from the ballot box,
a disequilibrium in the political arena emerges. The extremist wing is
overrepresented. It is,
now, no longer the representation of the majority. This phenomenon is
inherent in democratic systems. To avoid a situation as described above, each
individual is responsible
to vote for the party that best represents him or her.
It is
definitely wrong to express discontent by refusing to vote. One has to be
active to improve whatever one does not like. Doing nothing at all harms more than it
initiates positive change. Living in a democracy means that everybody has to
fulfil duties.
Going to elections
is one of them. As discussed in this essay, neglecting this duty might lead to
overrepresentation of extremist minorities. These minorities, however, cannot
possibly have much interest in keeping a functional democracy because an equal representation
would cost them its
political influence. Therefore, everybody who enjoys the freedom of democracy
should take the necessary
responsibilities and vote. Otherwise he or she contributes to the
downfall of democratic ideas.
[i1]Indent all paragaphs. (5 spaces).
[i2]One of the cases where notional
concord takes precedence over grammatical concord. Number is singular, but the idea is plural.
[i3]By + noun phrase.
[i4]A little strong for what you mean
here. If you were referring to
Selection 2000 in Florida, it would be more appropriate.
[i5]This is putting it a little
vaguely.
[i6]Not necessary.
[i7]Better: Let us now
consider why it is essential for people to vote in a democratic system.
[i8]??