UISCE NIGHEAN
THE ORIGIN OF MCNAUGHTON
In order to understand the origins of the name McNaughton we must go back to the most ancient evidence. That would be the ogham. Of all the oghams known to exist one name is the most numerous beyond all others, and that is Nechtan. The oghams, carved in stone, are said by most scholars to have been made between 600AD and 900AD, though it may fairly be added that there are also some who think they may be much older. Its not possible to carbon date a scratch in a rock. Fixing the date of the scratch is a difficult task. Some oghams were carved on stones with crosses, in cemeteries of churches making the estimation of 600AD to 900AD possible. But other oghams have no cross or other marking, like the one at Lunnasting, and these could possibly be two thousand years old or more. The language of the Ogham is unreadable today. The words do not make sense in any known language, leading some scientists to suggest these words were non-Indo-European in origin, an ancient lost language perhaps related to Basque, or Etruscan, or Estonian, or Magyar, for these languages are non-Indo-European, -- much older than the PIE languages that make up Europe and Asia. For the Ogham to be non-Indo-European would mean the priests who wrote the ogham had what is called a priest-language they spoke among themselves, a language that was lost to the common person of that day but still retained by the priests, in ancient oral genealogies, and prayers and songs, passed down from father to son and mother to daughter, from a very ancient time, among the priest families. Lets look at some of these Oghams.
On the
In
In Aboyne
In Bressay : CRROSCC NAHHTVVDDADDS DATTR ANN BENNISES MEQDDROANN Something about Nechtan and at the end Son of Droann
In Latheron : DUV NODNNATMAQQNAHHTO-- son of Nechtan
These are only a few of the examples. There are about thirty more Nechtan Oghams.
McNaughton scholars V.V.McNitt, Angus Macnaghten, and others have written they believe the surname Nechtan derives from the ancient root Nig, which means to wash or to be clean or pure. Further, they say this refers to the concept of a pure hostage or pledge, which could be left with a king in promise of a payment or duty. I am sure this is part of the truth, but not all of it. Neither of these scholars, nor any other I know of, considered the oghams. At least they never mentioned it in their writings. And the oghams are the OLDEST example in writing we have of the name.
The oghams give us a whole new insight. Nearly all of the oghams have a letter t in the middle of the name. NEHHTONS. NEHTETRI. MAQQNAHHTO. Etc. And this is from back in the ancient timeperiod when one would expect the root nig would apply. I dont rule out nig as part of the root concept. However I see the root NEHT, which has very ancient meanings: knit, knitting, and net to be equally important.
The net is one of the original fundamental pictograph symbols of the human race, with rock carving examples dating back more than seven thousand years. In the earliest days of existence the human race learned to twist together long fibers of mammoth wool and make thread and cordage. They tied arrowheads and axe heads to shafts. They knotted fibers together and made nets. The mammoth wool lay in clumps everywhere in the early world. Still today in the northern frozen tundra it is possible to find ancient clumps of mammoth wool undisturbed where it fell for tens of thousands of years. Our ancestors would wrap themselves in this wool to approach mammoths. Once they were close enough to the creature they could slit open his soft underbelly with their sharp obsidian blades. This mammoth wool was the first clothing of the human race. It was tied and knotted together. By the time the human race began carving picture symbols into stone and clay the net was already untold thousands of years old. The science of net making was thousands of years old. The science of knotting and weaving fibers together. Net and knit. Same root.
The last great ice age ended about ten
thousand years ago. The last of the mammoths disappeared from Europe and
The oldest Goddess of Egypt was Neith. She was considered the mother of the Sun God Ra. She was the darkness that the Sun came out of. She was the huntress with crossed arrows as her symbol. She came to be known as the goddess of weaving and knitting. The ancient Egyptian word netet means to knit or weave. Unlike other goddesses Neith does not have a husband. She has lovers, but no one man has power over her. The ancient Egyptian word root NNT is the same for weaving and being.
The Ancient Sanscrit word nahyati means binds, ties. Also nah. So we begin to see there exists an ancient rootword in primordial languages that is associated with weaving, knitting, tying, knotting.
In the Proto-Germanic language we find the word natjan, which means net and the word knutt which means knot.
In Old Norse we find knutr, meaning knot, and net meaning net.
Old English we find cnotta , meaning knotting ropes and cords, cnyttan meaning to tie with a knot, or bind. and net means mesh.
And in Early Irish we find snaidm and naidm meaning bond or nexus and snaidey which means to knit, and in Gaelic we find cniot�il, meaning knit and nittal meaning knitting.
All things considered I believe the ancient roots for knit and net are more likely candidates for the root of NEHHTON than nig. But I also think nig, meaning washed, pure, has a place in the ancient root. Because the consonants g and ch and cht and t are so closely related in the ancient guttural pronunciation. It isnt really possible to spell correctly the ancient sounds of that consonant. And it ends up being spelled in several different ways, especially by the first Christian monks who were trying to translate the ancient pronunciation into Roman letters.
So now we get to the old ways of saying the name. Neachain and Neachdain were two. And a bit earlier, in the most ancient land of the Picts we have the people called the Sons of Uisneachan. Also called the Sons of Uisneach. They were the royal Pict family. In the story of the princess Dierdre, she is raised with the three sons of Uisnech. The historian W.H.Murray contends this happened on Loch Etive. Dierdre especially loved the Uisnech brother named Naoise. It is said that Loch Ness gets its name from him. The ancient Fort of the Sons of Uisnech is located on the shores of Loch Etive. It is the largest of all the mysterious vitrified forts. Some historians say this is the ancient Beregonium, the primordial capitol of the Picts about 2000 years ago.
There were three Pict Kings named Nechtan. They were all related to each other. Because the royal Pict women chose who the king would be. It was a matrilinear society. There is a lot of confusion today. Part of it was caused by the great historian William Skene. He wrote some excellent history, but he also included some spurious genealogies in his books. He traces the Nechtan family back to the Nechtan kings and from there back to the Dalriadan genealogies. But Skene, brilliant as he was, could not always put things together very well. He didnt take Bede into account for instance. Bede was contemporary of the last King Nechtan and probably knew him personally. I say this because Bede spent his life in a Northumbrian monastery near the southern borders of Pictland. These monasteries were the hotels of their day, especially for royalty when they traveled. The Pict King Nechtan had a great deal of business to do with the nation of Northumbria and the Roman Catholic church there, because King Nechtan asked them to come to Pictland and build stone churches in their style and teach the Roman method of Christianity. So Pict envoys would be staying regularly in Bedes home. Perhaps even King Nechtan himself. Bede wrote quite a bit about King Nechtan and the Picts. Scholars have always considered Bede one of the greatest authorities. And Bede assures us that the Royal Pict women chose the kings. That is directly contrary to the Dalriadan society. The Picts were matrilinear. Genealogy was figured by tracing the mothers line back, not the fathers. But Skenes McNaughton/Nechtan genealogy is entirely father to son. And that totally disregards Bede, and what Pict historians tell us about Pict Royalty.
So where did Skenes version of ancient McNaughton genealogy come from? It's well known that traveling poets made their living by going from wealthy man to wealthy man and composing songs of praise about him. And composing fictitious genealogies tracing his lineage all the way back to Noah. For this they got sumptuous lodging and fine food and probably pretty women to sleep with. Not a bad job. Many of their fictitious genealogies were passed down as legitamate. I believe every evidence points to this happening in the case of Skene's McNaughton genealogy. Parts of Skenes McNaughton genealogy may be true though. Because when King Nechtan invited the Northumbrian Roman church into Pictland to teach its traditions it would have established patriarchal lineage and matrilinear ways would have ended. But the generations before King Nechtan, ho died about 732AD, would have been matrilinear, and they would not have led to Dalriada, they would have led to the Sons of Uisnech. So who were the sons of Uisnech?
Well, the Uisnech were a people of the
sea who probably lived in both places,
In the ancient days the holy ollahm of
There was also a sacred hill of
Uisnech, supposedly the center of
There was apparently a great war, where
the many of the sons of Uisnech were slain by Cuchlain and others were driven out of
You see, that is what all the brocks
and vitrified forts were all about. Fortifications to protect people from an enemy. It was
about metal really. The Carthaginians were the great metal traders of the
The vitrified forts and brocks stand
out to me as similar to constructions found on Sardinia and elsewhere in the
And that brings us around to the last bit of root analysis. Uisnech. What does it mean? We know it is two pieces. Uis and Nech. I have long contended that the Uisnech were the royal female Pict line. And the kings were the Sons of Uisnech. But let us analyze the two pieces.
We will start with Nech. It is close enough to Nehht to be one and the same. And the various g sounds, hard and soft, have been used to try to spell that difficult consonant. So, Nig is also the same. So, we are back to where we started, to Nig, as V.V.McNitt and Angus Macnaghten have said. But wait. There is another possibility. The word Nig means wash, or pure but the word nighean means a daughter. So . NEHHTON could be nighean, daughter.
Gaelic speakers used the prefix
Mhic to denote son of, shortened in modern usage to Mc
as in McNaughton. The most ancient examples in existence being the ogham Maqq: MAQQNAHHTO.
The most ancient development of the surname in
What about Uis? In Old Irish uisce means water.
So, we could translate Uisnech as something like Water Daughters. Sons of Uisnech. Sons of the Water Daughters. Does that make sense? It will in a minute.
You see, it is all about pools and springs and all flowing water in general, which in ancient days were thought to be the sacred places where Goddesses lived, where people left strips of cloth fluttering in the winds from the trees near the water, for she was goddess not only of sacred waters but of weaving, for it is the women who weave the universe.
King Nechtan was the God of Wisdom. He
lived beside the sacred pool that was the source of the River Boyne and his wife was
Thomas Holme
Copyright � Thomas Ross Holme October 25, 2005
I place this article on the internet for people to read. I would appreciate it if you quote my article you say it is mine. And I am especially upset about people who take my writings off the internet and put them into their own websites as if they wrote them. That is a pretty low thing to do. The concept that the Uisneachan = Uisce Nighean is something I realized while doing my research. Up until this time no one, no scholar from any University anywhere, no Scottish historian whatsoever, has realized it and written about it. So I will be perturbed if I discover a month from now or a year from now that someone has taken this as their own idea. Thanks. Thomas Holme. Oct 25, 2005.