Missing (Season 12 Review)

 

By Hank 74

 

Lennie-10/10
Ed-10/10
Van Buren-8/10
Jack-10/10
Serena-10/10
Nora-10/10
Supporting Cast-10/10
Plot-10/10
Performance-10/10
Value-9/10

Total Grade:97/100 or an A.

Notes:
I was clearly glued to my seat throughout the episode trying to figure out where this was going to end. Again, Mr. Wolf and company has given us a classic L&O twist where we don't know the real ending of this story, just as we don't know where the real life Chandra case will go because we haven't gone past first base yet.

When it comes to ripping stories from the headlines, TPTB on L&O has to use different standards for different situations. The rule which I have formulated is the more public the real life story, the more adjustments which needs to be made to keep us interested. It would have been really simple to copycat everything we have learned so far from the Chandra story. But if that approach was taken, then the audience would dip since we know already what has happened. I tried to come up with a plot idea on the Chandra case last summer and as usual Mr. Wolf and his writers blew me away. I was very impressed with the twists and turns plus the efforts made to add some wrinkles to make this ep unique while keeping us focused on the theme. For example, there were no press conferences from the girl's parents, no interview done by Weldon, no grand jury, and no attorney for the parents. Some things that were added in this ep included a body being found and an alleged accomplice. The only thing that I would have loved to see would be some hints of Weldon's place being searched and some more media attention given to this. Yet again, TPTB didn't want to make this ep just like what we saw on the talk shows this summer.

One thing I hope we get to see once again, and something that made this show great in the early years, would be more legal battles over evidence and the law in judge's chambers or in court itself. We don't see that anymore very often where Jack argues that something should be admitted or supressed. We don't get to see Serena going to a judge asking for a shaky search warrant. We also don't get to see more appeals being made in a higher court when someone is convicted. I think the "Order" side needs to inject back some of the legal battles that made this show so great in the beginning. Now what we have are interviews with witnesses, plea deals with accomplices at Rikers, regular courtroom scenes, and debates between the three on the "Order" side. Don't get me wrong, that is OK. But I want to see some more legal battles behind the scenes when appropriate.

The ending was fantastic! But I don't get a sense there will be a sequel to this one a la "Conspiracy" or "Coma." Yet I do sense the wife had something to do with this murder. This smells just like "Dissonance" last year when the conductor's wife confesses on the stand. But Weldon's wife is from a different cloth and she won't budge. I see her more of like the daughter in "Girlfriends" where she sneakily gets away with a crime and lets her father rot in prison. Another example would be the Stella Dixon in "Deceit."

A wonderful episode, with well acting from everyone and a great plot. A great way to keep us going during the two week break for the Olympics.

 

Back to Judicial Review

 

What do you think? Email me!

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1