CHAPTER 1, 11
OVERVIEW OF CRIMINOLOGY and
CONCEPTS OF CRIME
I. CRIMINOLOGY DEFINED:
Raffaele Garofalo (1885)
- Definition: The scientific study of the nature, extent, cause
and control of crime.
Criminal Justice: Concerned with the agencies of social
control
Edwin Sutherland "Dean of American Criminology":
it
includes the process of
- making of the laws that govern our behavior
- the breaking of those laws
- and societies reactions to the breaking of the laws
Why Study Crime?
II. ORIGINS OF CRIMINAL LAW
- Values: Shared ideas about what is right.
- Norms: Generally accepted patterns of behavior
1. Folkways: traditions, customs and habits of
societies that are passed down from one generation to the next.
2. Mores: behaviors that are considered vital
to the continuation of the society. Refers to the more serious norms
that prohibit such acts as murder and theft.
- Laws: Norms that have been formalized and are written with
specified sanctions
Deviance:
Any behavior that violates the norms of particular society.
Deviant Behavior Scale:
<-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not serious
Very Serious
Informal sanctions
Formal Sanctions
Non conformist ----------------------------------Antisocial/
or eccentric behavior
Criminal
Social Control: the regulation of human behavior in a society in
an effort to encourage conformity.
Internalization: Societies norms have become part of our
own belief system.
Types of Social Control
- Social Control: sanctions for unwritten norms
- Formal Social Control: sanction for violations of
laws
III. EARLY LEGAL CODES:
Code of Hammurabi (1792-1750 b.c.)
Classes of society
Punishments:
- Lex Talionis (eye for an eye,
tooth for a tooth)
Mosaic Code of the Israelites
(1400 b.c.)
Crime was a Sin
"Whoever sheds the blood
of man, by man shall his blood be shed…" (Gen. 9:6)
Laws given to Moses on
Mt. Sinai (Exodus 21,22)
- The law ordained execution
for several offenses:
- striking or cursing a
parent
- rape of a betrothed
virgin
Numerous
sexual offenses were capital crimes (Leviticus 20)
Religious
violations
-
sacrificing to false gods
Punishments:
"If anyone has injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done
to him: fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth." (Leviticus
24)
Multiple restitution:
If one steals an ox or sheep the thief must pay back with 5 ox or 4 sheep
Protection of property (justifiable homocide):
"If a thief is caught breaking in and is struck so that he dies, the defender
is not guilty of bloodshed; but if it happens after shunrise, he is builty
of bloodshed."
Drawing lots: Off the high priests breast plate. Depending
upon the one chosen would determine guilt.
Ten Commandments
Roman law (450 b.c.)
Twelve Tables of Rome:
Law protected the State
Status determines punishment
-
patria postestas, referred to the absolute control fathers had over the
children and the children’s responsibility to obey.
-
parens patria "State is the father"
Athenian Law:
Developed sophisticated Court system
Platter and Loin Cloth Searches
Common Purposes of Ancient Codes:
-
Promote their religious views
-
Preserve and protect the government and society
-
control revenge or vengeance
-
protect private property and commerce
Common Illegal Acts:
Common Procedures:
-
Victims had to initiate the proceedings since there was no police force.
-
They relied upon divine guidance to reach a verdict (oaths)
-
group decision was superior to the individual (jury system)
Punishments:
-
banishment (often resulted in death)
-
flogging, scourging or caning
-
restitution: usually in multiples of the damages
Justinian Code (6th century)
Medieval Europe: dark ages (400-1,000 ad.)
Clovis: King of the Franks
Methods for settling disputes:
IV. COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND
PRE-1066 (NORMAN CONQUEST)
Courts:
-
shire-gemot (local landholders) or
-
hali-gemot (local nobleman)
-
holy-motes or ecclesiastics.
Crimes were personal wrongs
POST 1066
-
Stare Decisis: Once a decision is made in a previous case it becomes
the law for all subsequent cases.
Henry II (1154-1189)
-
Common Law : Unwritten law based on the customs and traditions
of the land
Common Law in America:
V. CLASSIFICATION OF LAW:
CRIMES AND TORTS:
-
Tort: is a civil action where a wronged party seeks compensation
from the wrongdoer.
Criminal Law:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Tort (Civil) Law
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS
-
Felonies: most serious of the offenses: punishment can be by imprisonment
or death.
-
Misdemeanor: Less serious offenses: punishment is by a term in
jail up to one year.
State Jail Felonies
MALA IN SE and MALA PROHIBITA
-
Mala in Se: Evil in themselves
-
Mala Prohibita: Illegal only because it has been prohibited by the States
SUBSTANTIVE AND PROCEDURAL LAW
-
Substantive Law: Defines what the crime is
-
Procedural Law: Rules designed to implement the substantive law
VI. FUNCTIONS OF CRIMINAL LAW:
1. Control anti-social behavior
2. Discourage revenge
3. Control morality, promote safety and health
4. Maintain social , economic and political order
VII. LEGAL DEFINITION OF CRIME:
Crime: An intentional act or an omission of an act that violates criminal
law without legal excuse in which the state can apply sanctions.
Elements of a crime:
1. Acts or Omission of an act (Actus Reus):
2. Intent: (mens rea)
Culpable mental states:
-
intentionally (conscious objective desire to engage in the conduct)
-
knowingly (must be aware that his conduct is reasonably certain
to cause the result)
-
recklessly (consciously disregards a substantial and
unjustifiable risk of such a nature and degree that its disregard constitutes
a gross deviation from the standard of care an ordinary person would have
exercised under all of the circumstances from the actors viewpoint)
-
negligently (same as recklessly but actor “should have known”
Strict Liability: no need to prove intent, the actor is
guilty simply by committing
the act.
3. Violation of a criminal law
4. Without defense or justification to criminal responsibility.
Defenses:
M’Naghten Rule: 1843 English Case:
An offender is insane if they are unable to tell the difference between right
and wrong because of a mental disability or they did not know the nature
and quality of the act they were committing.
Texas: because of severe mental disease—did not know his conduct
was wrong
Irresistible impulse Test:
Mental disease makes it impossible to control personal conduct. Maybe
able to distinguish between right and wrong but cannot control their actions.
Substantial capacity Test: (A.L.I. test)
As a result of the mental disease or defect the offender lacks the substantial
capacity to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct
to the requirements of the law.
Guilty but mentally ill:
General rule:
Police induced him into committing a crime that he might not have otherwise
have committed.
Common law:
Under 7
Between the ages of 7-14
Over 14
Texas juvenile court jurisdiction: 10-17
Mandatory and Discretionary transfers to Criminal court.
Justifications:
Defendant must have been threatened with bodily injury or death
Defendant must break the law to avoid a greater harm caused by natural
forces such as hurricanes
Defendant must have acted under a
1. reasonable belief that he or she was in
2. immediate danger of death and or great harm and the act was
3. unlawful and it was
4. necessary to use force to prevent harm to themselves.
Deadly Force:
Protection of property:
Texas: Only allowed to use deadly force to protect your dwelling but
only if the crime involves a burglary, robbery or theft at night.
-
Public Duty: Actor must reasonably believe that the act was authorized
by law.
VIII. ATTEMPTS TO COMMIT A CRIME (INCHOATE)
Common Law prior to 1784: Unsuccessful attempts to commit crime could
not be prosecuted because there was no criminal act. (Actus Reus)
Rex v. Scofield (1784)
Texas: "A person commits an offense if, with specific intent to commit an
offense, does and act amounting to more than mere preparation that tends
but fails to effect the commission of the offense intended.