PROBATION
CHAPTER 7
CORRECTIONAL SYSTEMS


I.  HISTORY
Probation:  Latin term:


A. Judicial Alternatives



It came to be known as the "neck verse".





"without benefit of clergy."
      











II.  U.S. History



Augustus developed methods to





Augustus primarily worked with the same Judge Peter Oxenbridge Thatcher








III. EVOLUTION
A. United States

1841-1859: 

1878: 

1912-1925: 

1925

1954: 

1950-1970: 

1970's:

1980’s: 

2000:  


B. Texas:
1913: 

1947:

1965: 

1970's


1977: 



C.  Evolution of Probation:








1.  Purpose of Probation:

Burns v. United States (1932): 
"provided a period of grace in order to aid the rehabilitation of the penitent offender; to take advantage of an opportunity for reformation which if sentenced to prison would make less probable"



2.  Early Probation programs:



It was not a right but a privilege. U.S. v. Birnbaum (1970)












II.  PROBATION TODAY
1970's: Reintegration Era:  probation was rehabilitation oriented.  


1980’s: Crime Control Era:  


1989:


"to impose any reasonable condition that is designed to protect or restore the community, protect or restore the victim, or punish, rehabilitate, or reform the defendant."



Objectives:
Protect and restore the Community
Protect and restore the victim
Punish, rehabilitate and reform the offender


III. ORGANIZATION OF PROBATION:
A. Local or State Judiciary: 


B. State executive:


C. Local Executive:   Least common but it is one used by Texas.


D.   Texas Organization
Pre- 1977: 

1977:

1989:  Reorganized
Adult Probation Departments renamed to Community Supervision and Corrections Departments

Probation = Community Supervision




V.  Probation population:


              
Year         Total    Probation    Prison    Jail    Parole
1980                        61%       17%      10%    12%
          1990                        61%       17%      10%    12%

          2000                       59%        20%        9%    11%
         Growth      247%    240%    306%     229%    218%


Texas:  
Year               Probation       Ratio     Prison
           1993               371,400       6.5/1    57,000
           1995               409,400       4.4/1    96,000
           2000               451,000       2.8/1    161,000
        Growth                 +18%                     +65%




VI.  Eligibility for Probation
A.  Legal restrictions: (Texas)
A defendant is ineligible for probation if:



Offender may be ineligible because of



B.  Sentencing Process:

Most probation sentences are a result of a plea bargain



C. Factors influencing decision to probate:

Whether a defendant receives probation depends upon several factors:















VII.   Probation Conditions/terms
Probation is really a contract between the defendant and the judge.
A. Term: (Texas)




B. Conditions:

In Texas, most are discretionary with a few exceptions.

Conditions usually fall in one of three realms:
A. Standard conditions:






B. Punitive Conditions:





C.  Treatment:




There are two main functions that all probation departments provide:  Investigation and Supervision


VIII. Pre-Sentence Investigation: (PSI)

Investigative Report on the past and present circumstances of a convicted offender utilized by the sentencing judge to determine a sentence



A. Purpose (Texas)









B.  Procedure
1.   Who:




2.  How:

Most PSI's (90%) are written as the result of a plea bargain

3.  Source of information:

















4.  Content







5.  Review:
In Texas, the defendant, defense attorney and prosecutor have the right to read the report prior to sentencing

The pre-sentence is not public record unless it is placed in the public file. 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1