PROBATION
CHAPTER 7
CORRECTIONAL SYSTEMS
I. HISTORY
Probation: Latin term:
A. Judicial Alternatives
- Benefit of Clergy: (13th century--1827)
It came to be known as the "neck verse".
"without benefit of clergy."
II. U.S. History
- John Augustus: (1784-1859) Father of Probation
(1841)
Augustus developed methods to
Augustus primarily worked with the same Judge
Peter Oxenbridge Thatcher
III. EVOLUTION
A. United States
1841-1859:
1878:
1912-1925:
1925
1954:
1950-1970:
1970's:
1980’s:
2000:
B. Texas:
1913:
1947:
1965:
1970's
1977:
C. Evolution of Probation:
1. Purpose of Probation:
Burns v. United States (1932):
"provided a period of grace in order to aid the rehabilitation of the penitent
offender; to take advantage of an opportunity for reformation which if sentenced
to prison would make less probable"
2. Early
Probation programs:
It was not
a right but a privilege. U.S. v. Birnbaum (1970)
II. PROBATION TODAY
1970's: Reintegration
Era: probation was rehabilitation oriented.
1980’s:
Crime Control Era:
1989:
"to
impose any reasonable condition that is designed to protect or restore the
community, protect or restore the victim, or punish, rehabilitate, or reform
the defendant."
Objectives:
Protect and restore the Community
Protect and restore the victim
Punish, rehabilitate and reform the offender
III. ORGANIZATION OF PROBATION:
A. Local or State Judiciary:
B. State executive:
C. Local Executive: Least common but it is one used by Texas.
D. Texas Organization
Pre- 1977:
1977:
1989: Reorganized
Adult Probation Departments renamed to Community Supervision and Corrections
Departments
Probation = Community Supervision
V. Probation population:
Year Total Probation
Prison Jail Parole
1980
61% 17% 10%
12%
1990
61%
17% 10% 12%
2000
59%
20% 9% 11%
Growth 247%
240% 306% 229% 218%
Texas:
Year Probation
Ratio Prison
1993
371,400 6.5/1 57,000
1995
409,400 4.4/1 96,000
2000
451,000 2.8/1 161,000
Growth
+18%
+65%
VI. Eligibility for Probation
A. Legal restrictions: (Texas)
A defendant is ineligible for probation if:
Offender may be ineligible because of
B. Sentencing Process:
Most probation sentences are a result of a plea bargain
C. Factors influencing decision to probate:
Whether a defendant receives probation depends upon several factors:
VII. Probation Conditions/terms
Probation is really a contract between the defendant and the judge.
A. Term: (Texas)
B. Conditions:
In Texas, most are discretionary with a few exceptions.
-
DWI offenders are required to submit to a substance abuse evaluation and
attend counseling and a minimum amount of jail time as a condition.
-
Special conditions for sexual assault offenders and abusers of children.
-
Defendant must participate in an education program designed to increase his
level of academic proficiency to a 6th grade level.
Conditions usually fall in one of three realms:
A. Standard conditions:
B. Punitive Conditions:
C. Treatment:
There are two main functions that all probation departments provide:
Investigation and Supervision
VIII. Pre-Sentence Investigation: (PSI)
Investigative Report on the past and present circumstances of a convicted
offender utilized by the sentencing judge to determine a sentence
A. Purpose (Texas)
B. Procedure
1. Who:
2. How:
Most PSI's (90%) are written as the result of a plea bargain
3. Source of information:
4. Content
5. Review:
In Texas, the defendant, defense attorney and prosecutor have the right to
read the report prior to sentencing
The pre-sentence is not public record unless it is placed in the public file.