Points 

Criteria 

Unacceptable 

Passing 

Acceptable 

Competent 

Excellent

40 

detail -accuracy of the metaphor

There is no model or the structural details are completely wrong

20/40

A few of the structural details represented accurately

25/40

Most of the structural details are represented; some of them accurately

30/40

All of the relevant structural details are represented; most accurately

35/40

The structural details are all well represented and very accurate.

40/40

25 

quality of presentation - explanation of metaphor

Explanation of metaphor is inaccurate and incomplete;

10/25

Explanation of metaphor is incomplete;

15/25

Explanation of structure is good

20/25

Explanation of metaphor is good.

22/25

Explanation of metaphor is clear and factually accurate.

25/25

20 

individual participation

Only one person in the group does the presentation; the parts may be connected or not

3/20

One person does more than 70% of the presentation and the parts are presented separately

5/20

One person does 60-70% of the presentation; the parts are presented separately

10/20

Only one of the following is present; equal participation or connected parts

15/20

All  group participants

participated equally; the parts are well connected

20/20

15 

creativity 

No evidence of creativity

3/15

There is some evidence of an attempt to be creative but it is not executed well 

6/15

There are a few creative details in the metaphor or report 

10/15

There are several creative details in the metaphor and report

13/15

The entire project shows evidence of creative thinking - both creation of the metaphor and presentation.

15/15

100 

Total