On Biological Sensibility -Biological philosophy. Biological sensibility. These concepts should be used to confront things like abortion and homosexuality. -Purpose: to build a feasible system of ethics for the present. -Body Sense: the trends of the present rely heavily on the human body, particularly the private parts of the human body. The human body functions to sustain life. It is a self-healing entity. It is a reproducing entity. It desires that its needs be meet and its senses pleased. It naturally chooses life. August 28, 2003 -Homosexuality goes against reproduction. September 23, 2003 -A Word Against Those Who Boastfully Label Themselves “Gay": -against life -against reproduction -against the opposite sex -against themselves -embrace a false identity October 23, 2003 -Why Homosexuality Is Unjust (how it is against life). November 9, 2003 -I am strongly opposed to those who boastfully label themselves “gay.” They are rude and negatively prideful; they are shameless about their indecency. To label themselves as “stubborn perverts” would be more accurate. True, nobody is perfect; but to not have appropriate standards is life-threatening. This note is particularly against the “gay marriage” of same-sex persons because such “marriages” are contrary to society and life because they exclude and discriminate against the opposite sex and disrespect the proper, and sacred, marriage institution. Such disregard for the opposite sex is not only negative for society; it also leaves no available option for proper reproduction and a fair representation of parents. The definition of marriage should not be changed to accommodate perversion. -The steps that can be taken by Canadian citizens of goodwill, despite the present government’s legislation: 1. Do not attend any “gay pride” parades. 2. Practice, and speak out about, the benefits of abstinence. 3. Write and argue against the fallacies of those who label themselves “gay.” May 2, 2004 -What I say about “gays” is not “bashing.” It is rather exposing because there are people who act as if they are somehow blind to such perversion. Women are anatomically suited for men, and men are anatomically suited for women. How much clearer could it be? “Gays” are the way they are by choice; it is not that they “can’t help it.” All singles can, and should, practice abstinence before they get married, and not prefer to resort to some kind of perversion. “Gays” must not be legally applauded for being against the opposite sex. Those who label themselves “gay” invoke a social distaste because they disregard and disrespect the opposite sex. -Those who proudly call themselves “gay” should realize that what they believe is genderly false, and that they are causing a social disharmony, because the “identity” that they have chosen is a false one. The “gay identity” is genderly false; consequently, it is not feasible for a harmonious society. May 8, 2004 -Anatomical Ethics: Exposing the Fallacies of Those Who Call Themselves “Gay.” -Human anatomical justice. May 15, 2004 -“Legal Applause”: Exposing A False Notion of Contemporary Ethics and Why “Gays” are Legally Applauded in Canada. -It is not that people who claim to be “gay” should automatically go to prison (unless of course they have committed crimes such as molestation, rape, or any other known criminal offences). However, clearly they should not be legally applauded by governments. This means no government support of “gay pride,” “gay marriage,” “gay parades,” or any other social disturbances involving a “gay” or “gays.” People who say that they are “gay,” must, eventually, face the natural, social, consequences for their perversion; which are, in part, isolation and shame. A government must not try to prevent “gays” from seeing and realizing their own real folly (and the natural, social, consequences that will result from such folly) by superficially attempting to applaud it through programs, schools, or any other means, in the eyes of the public. -Why is it that Canada seems to be increasingly developing a name for “legally applauding” and patronizing the perverted, or undeserving, person? There really needs to be a change from this in Canada.