| |
Home
and Attorney
In Leningrad in our cooperative building an attorney, also a Jew, maybe
about 50 years of age, lived with his wife under us on the 7th floor in
a one -bedroom apartment. He had a daughter, who lived with her family
in another apartment far from us.
After some time, the district committee CPSU gave the attorney a government
two-bedroom apartment. In Leningrad the situation with housing was difficult.
If you wanted to be on a waiting list to receive a government apartment,
your family would have to have less than 3 square meters (96.82 square
feet) of living space for each person in their room (apartment). (The
living square meter area did not include the area of the kitchen and bathroom).
For a last apartment you had to wait maybe 10 years.
If you wanted to be on the list for a cooperative building apartment you
would have to have less than 6 square meters (387.6 square feet) per person
in your dwelling.
Khrushchev was famous because he permitted the building of cooperative
apartments for sail to individuals. (In the Soviet economy that meant
he gave the command to the ministry to organize the construction program).
We had to pay a down payment of 40% of the total cost of the apartment.
After that we had to pay monthly for 20 years. (In some good cooperative
buildings it was necessary to pay all the money in to the building.) After
giving the down payment we very often had to wait 1-2 years for the building
to be constructed.
I want to tell you that the monthly payment for service in the government
apartment was less than in the cooperative apartment for the same square
meters. (You also had to pay a fee for the monthly debt of the cooperative
apartment). Before Khrushchev's time, the situation with housing was critical.
In my situation we lived in our one bedroom apartment with 5 people. We
had 30.08 square meters for 5 people. We had to build a cooperative studio
apartment for the family of our daughter. We had a big problem because
for one person we had more than 6.0 meters (6.02). My wife brought a special
letter from her plant, where she was a good worker that was signed by
the director of the plant and secretary of the party committee of the
plant and the leader of the trade union committee. That letter allowed
her to be included on the list for the apartment.
About the attorney, when he received the government two-bedroom apartment,
he relinquished his one-bedroom private cooperative and received back
his money for the apartment.
After receiving such a valuable apartment, the attorney was no longer
acting independently in the role as an attorney in the court. He had to
give whatever decision the district committee CPSU wanted from him when
they made a specific request. In other private cases the attorney could
decide as he wanted to do.
Home
| Email
Us
|
This
site created and maintained by Larisa Luvish-Trell
|
Email
to Larisa Luvish-Trell
with questions or comments about this Web Site.
|
|