|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Group 2: "Classic Tan" Site | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Go To Group Two's Site! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critique for May 1, 2007: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This analysis is really good because it is both very descriptive and tells the story. They also use very thorrough and good transitions. There is little personal input, but it is a good summary of the story. It also is displayed very appropriately and is visually welcoming with the picture of the book to the left and the summary to the right. Overall a good summary. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critique for April 2, 2007: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group 2 had an interesting review about a story where peer pressure and equality dominate the setting. The story was explained very well and there were very few errors in the writing. The ending was also nice, because it was explanatory and thought provoking, without giving too much away for the future readers of the book. A good reveiw overall. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critique for March 1, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group 2 had a good outline of the story, The Merchant of Venice. It was clearly written and the story was understood very clearly. However, it was missing the exposition, rising action, and denoument. It is well told though, and good grammar was used. Overall, a good analysis. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critique for February 1, 2007: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| I was rather surprised that Group Two did an exceptional job on last month's site. The literary analysis proved to have information that actually told me about what they wre reading. The reason why I think they did so well this month is that if I didn't know anything about this book, reading their site would be tell me whether I was interested in the book or not. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critique for January 9, 2007: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Grout 2 did an excellant job with the literary analysis this month. Their critique was informative and interesting throughout. It was neat how they diverged from the traditional way of doing a critique in that each paragraph is a different part of Freytag's pyramid, and created each paragraph differently. They still included all of the information, it was simply integrated into their own style. This was truly excellant work. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critique for December 1, 2006: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This was a decent Analysis of Twelfth Night by William Shakespeare. The exposition, rising action, climax, and denouement were all present, but in varying degrees of explanation. It was a little dull as it read, but afterword, it leaves a nice idea and analysis of the book. The only thing that would have improved this analysis is a more clearly defined Freytag's pyramid. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back To Home | |||||||||||||||||||||||||