~Critique of The Prince and the Pauper
~Critique of Huckleberry Finn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Group 1: "The Group" Site | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Go To Group One's Site! | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critique for May 1, 2007: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| This analysis was not very serious, but it was humorous. It seems that the writer put whatever comment he thought of at the time in. The advantage to this critique, is that the writer put some personal input to the story, which made it much more interesting to read. However, a better verbal usage would improve this even more, and the thoughts of the writer should be communicated better. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critique for April 2, 2007: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| We felt that the The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe was a very good selection to read. The group did a job well done on explaining the book and introduction. We didn't feel as if they gave any broad details or left usfeeling it wasn't good enough. We do feel they could have given more infomation on the climax because that is the turning point of every book! Other than that, their explanation was pretty self explanatory. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critique for March 1, 2007: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critique for February 1, 2007: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Analysis for this month was amazing. The information about the story may have been lacking, but the way the information was presented, and the comedic style it was written in more than made up for it. The book sounds confusing and dull, but that very may well be a characteristic of our impressions of Sherlock Holmes's work. Group One did an excellent job of expressing their opinions creatively. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critique for January 9, 2007: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| I must say that although they did our book, they did an okay job. Not as good as ours but they get a "C" for effort. A little more information could have been added so that the book could be explained better, so if I had never read the book before I would know what it was about. But overall good. ~Critique of The Prince and the Pauper |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Critique for December 1, 2006: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| This rendition of Freytag's pyramid to "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" has high points and low points. The work is desplayed well in that the paragraphs are seperated to indicate the story's intro, climax, etc. The introduction and the rising action seem to be too closely related. However, the rest of the paragraphs are written well.
~Critique of Huckleberry Finn |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back To Home | |||||||||||||||||||||||