back to homepage
|
|
|
|
|
| Nobody gives a crap if you support PETA | ||||
| Why should anybody give a crap if you think animal rights are important. There are only two types of animals that deserve rights, any others are just a waste of food and water. One type is indangered species. If all the large cats (lions, tigers, ect) were to die there wouldn't be enough hyenas to keep the wildabeast from over populating. For the same in Asia switch lion to tiger, hyena to giant lizard, and wildabeast to orienatal animal. I typed that because things just don't roll the same way in Asia as Africa. They just don't. If PETA supporters really cared they'd do more then just post banners and put fliers on your car. They'd be noble and tie themselves to the cows utters so people can't milk the cows. And if PETA's cause won the war, millions of farmers world wide would lose their jobs. One of my grandpas was a farmer. But back in his day I'm not sure if animal rights existed. Did they even have an indagered list then? I forgot to say the other animal that should have rights. The domestic. These furry cuddly soft animals are more lovable then any bear or snake. If it were up to me there would only be enough predators to eat prey and only enough decomposers to eat poop and predator bodies. If that could actually happen I would be rather happy. It would give more room for farmers. I have an even better idea. We build a huge island and put trees, plants, and lakes on it. Then wait 5 years for the trees and shrubs to grow. By then, some bugs may even be on it. Finally, over the next ten years we put as many animals as we can that could survive in that locations location. We'd make about 15 of those islands and the human world would be free of many animals. We could have daily food gathering ships and planes that go over to the islands for meats. My plan may be no nobel prize winner, but it's better then sharing this land with more animals then we can count. There's got to be 3 times as many ants as there are humans in the united states alone, and through the world it must be about 18 times as many. If the ants were as smart as we were in 1 B.C. they would win a war between us and them. There's a handfull of people who think that a select few species of animals are smarter then humans. I argue, saying they would have buildings made and complex computers and movies. They debate with "we have something they don't, hands. We can pick up things and they can't. Basically, it's if they could they would." But if they were smarter then us they would figure a way around not having fingers. There's too many animals out there. Scientists say we've only discovered 4 of 10 creatures in short. But if it were really that simple it would be more like 4000,000,000,000, of 10000,000,000,000. I think we've discovered at least eight of ten. There's probably only one million square feet that humans haven't been near worlwide. And who knows, we could have been everywhere in pre-historic times. I'm getting bored of typing this article and you can see why by how long it is. OAO back to homepage |
||||