Chapter 5 - THE UNIFIED FIELD THEORY |
Home
Title
Contents
(Download NOW) - For Free
Let There Be The Light
Once mass (m3/s3) is defined, the density (mass/volume) must be defined via mass: m3/s3/m3 simplifies to 1/s3 or 1/time or 1/(3-D change). The disappearance of volume in UFT density is NOT a coincidence but a field requirement existing ONLY at c3 - undeniably equating density to the field and logically validating this theory.
(1/s3) is called the field. Empirically, the volume does not change the density and the UFT clearly shows the difference between the definition (1/s3) and the derivation (mass/volume) of density.
Consequently, with the field being defined as density, the classical definition of the field as an action at a distance force are reworded. The basic field is not a fictional force-field but a scientific force-field defined as: the harmonic volume of time contained within density � unifying the field in thought and law.
A couple of very important concepts must be developed before going any further in explaining the UFT. Linear velocity is defined as a displacement in meters/second (m/s) and acceleration as (m/s2). While keeping in line with classical Newtonian physics, a deviation from �tradition� is mandatory in defining the field.
Newton assumed that mass could be considered a �point-particle� in deriving the kinematic equations and theories coupled closely to motion. These theories, though valid at non-relativistic speeds, are replaced with a volumetric-particle assumption � assuming ONE instead of ZERO for an unspecified volume.
Assuming that any object moving in 3-D space must naturally displace volume, necessitates different SI units to define velocity and acceleration. The linear velocity is defined in terms of m3/s and the linear acceleration in terms of m3/s2.
However, to maintain uniformity in the motion concept, congruency measures are taken. For instance, an object with a volume of 100 cubic meters and an object of 10 cubic meters will certainly displace a different volume in motion, though the concept of will be the same.
To kept these concepts synchronous, velocity is defined in the terms of volumes/second and acceleration in terms of volumes/second circled. Although the volume is always in terms of cubic meters, the actual volume of the object in motion is not stipulated by the UFT velocity and acceleration concepts - only a general abstraction of volume is applied to the object in question.
Instead of assuming Newtonian, point-particle, zero-volumed kinematics, an equivalence exists in assuming a volume of one - forming another UNIT in UNITY and providing an inherent quality of volume displacement explaining phenomena such as buoyancy more accurately.
As an example: an object of 100 cubic meters and an object of 10 cubic meters both displacing 10 volumes/second will stipulate that the first object moves 1000 cubic meters in a second and the second object moves 100 cubic meters in a second, though the speed is the same (10 vol/sec).
Assuming "speed" to be an abstraction of unit-volume-displacement is conceptually equivalent to volume-less displacement and linear displacement can easily be calibrated to volumed displacement. Stating a �car� vs. a �fly� moving at 10 volumes/second shows a �feel� called the inherent quality of volume acquired by using volumetric definitions of motion.
In Fact, whenever displacement or distance is referenced, volume is assumed and whenever wavelength is referenced, point-particle displacement is assumed � coupling all forms of motion to the field existing in the concept of mass frequencies.
Density is not a standard in the kinematic equations. Thus, it can be assumed that when the mass only is given, a "Volume" of 1 cubic meter is presupposed. Classical equations that used mass (kg) and motion to derive physical relationships are replaced with density and motion - provably equivalent by motion being volumetric space and density being volumetric time (the union includes mass defined as space-time).
A theory can not unify anything without basing everything within the Domain on the unifying concept or a union which involves the unifying concept � the Field. It is not a coincidence but a necessity that this field defines both mass and density itself.
Light is considered a Newtonian point-particle and wavelength is measured in units of m/s. Cubing the speed of light (c) is assumed to form volume and density in mass by utilizing wavelength, wavewidth, and wavedepth. The speed of light (c) cubed = 2.694400241 x 1025 m3/s3 (Space-times).
Loschmidt's Constant (2.6867775 x 1025 /m3) equal to the number of molecules in one cubic meter of a gaseous substance under ordinary conditions of temperature and pressure is also Avogadro's Number divided by the molar volume of a substance.
Since Avogadro's Law states that the number of gas molecules under the same temperature and pressure remains constant, experiments should show that the difference between c3 and Loschmidt's Constant is related to the molar gas constant (R = 8.314472(15) J � K-1 � mol-1 ), attributable to the mass of the gas and �specifically� is definable as density in units of (1/s3) � proving the UFT!
The current molar gas constant has many units, however from the idea gas law PV = nRT or pressure x volume = moles x R x Temperature. By looking at the UFT's Table of Field Substitutions, pressure and temperature have the same units (m6/s5) meaning "R" must have the very interesting and convenient units of m3/n - relating volume to a number of molecules in an ideal gas!
Thus, dividing c3 by Loschmidt's Constant, derives the value 1.002837 m6/s3 for a constant of gaseous Flux. This, as would be expected, is very close to 1 for the ideal gas and should be related to gaseous flux in diffusion: fg = 2πdmfp(a,b)2(8kT/πN)1/2 where πdmfp(a,b) = the mean free path (kT/(21/2πd2p, where d=diameterof the gas particles and p=pressure) between molecules a and b, k = the Boltzman Constant (1.380 6504(24)�10−23 J/K) and T is the relative temperature in Kelvins.
c3 is the minimal amount of mass detectable and can be considered the "mass of light". Equations will prove that at c3 the Energy and Momentum of a photon corresponds to the definition of mass and the permittivity and permeability of free space.
This equation explicitly states that light is equivalent to the minimal density of any material corresponding to the highly sought after mass gap and has a volume of 2.694400241 x 1025 m3. For any other material, the m3/s3 will be less than the fulcrum of mass (c3).
Sphering time to form the field means that repetition is involved, linear motion is not necessarily stipulated by this quantity, viewable as a harmonic of light combining to c3 and ONLY c3 - forming matter itself in the frequency fluctuations of a Fourier Series.
Though not a requirement of the theory - harmonics will be resolved with the frequencies of coherent holographic light. The interference patterns forming a hologram or the illusion of mass are hypothesized to actually form mass when the light frequencies are increased.
Quantitatively speaking, c3 is slightly above the gamma-ray range in magnitude on the light spectrum. Hypothesizing that light becomes more and more dense as frequencies go from X-rays to gamma-rays equating to matter when c3 is reached equally explains the fact that - as the frequencies are increased, light penetrates matter more and more.
However, although the frequency is the same as matter for gamma rays, the rotations are not opposite to create matter itself. Thus, a gamma-ray is considered the light equivalent of matter.
When an electron and an anti-electron collide, they appear to annihilate each other and produce two photons. According to the mass/energy relation and the law of energy conservation forbidding energy destruction, it is valid to assume that the disturbance from this collision decreases each particle's frequency harmonics - transmuting them from matter into light.
Theorizing that matter is created via light validates the experimental disintegration of matter into light via a collision. The wave-length of De Broglie Matter Waves as well as The Schr�dinger Wave Equation support this hypothesis as well.
Although the speed of light is currently the boundary on speed, the frequency of light already has magnitudes well beyond �c�. And the frequency is defined as 1/period or how fast something is repeating.
Empirically, light can repeat faster than it can propagate, which is clearly shown in the lack of a theoretical upper bound in a light frequency chart. The magnitude of the speed of light squared is actually the X-ray range of light. Certainly, the wave-length shortens with increased frequency - yet a harmony exists.
Accordingly, this theory provably hypothesizes that the wave-length contracts to the constituents of matter to produce De Broglie Matter Waves forming a mass equivalence at the specific harmonic with a magnitude of c3.
It takes 8 odd minutes for light to travel from the sun to the earth. Nature clearly dictates that �time� does exist at the �speed of light�. Therefore, what seems to be a better and time proven hypothesis: the only thing constant is the speed-of-light -or- the only thing constant is change!
Making light an upper bound and constant designator of speed automatically localizes time opposing nature � which localizes light implying time to be a constant measure of change. Unrelated to the UFT qualification, it must be stated that: using light based instruments for measurements of relativistic speeds may invalidate the assumption of �c� being the upper bound on speed.
Void of any sensation of light, sound based instruments will be used and sonic speeds may likely place the speed of �sound� as an upper bound of speed and length and time would seemingly contract and dilate based on this speed � according to the instruments. The Doppler effect for light (red/blue shift) is based on a greater phenomena such as gravity � naturally perceived and sensed to be faster than light.
The UFT assumes Gravity to be the upper bound on detectable speed, called the speed of darkness or nothingness. Science must be ever cautious when defining boundaries of existence. Therefore, Zero and Infinity are considered lower and upper limits � with �zero� defined by space , �infinity� defined by �time�, and �measurable� detection defined by �Gravity�.
However, to avoid any confusion: m = c3 = g1/2 does NOT necessarily mean that "something" is moving at the speed of light cubed, just as E = mc2 does NOT necessarily mean that "something" is moving at the speed of light squared.
To be more precise and logically infallible, it is hypothesized that "Nothing" is moving at these speeds to form "Something". Thus, stating that "nothing" can travel faster than light has a double meaning � not just negating the assertion but also asserting the negation - requiring an hypothesis that "nothing" can and does exist in The Darkness.
Home
Title
Contents
(Download NOW) - For Free
© 2001 By Daryl E. Waite ([email protected])
(All Rights Reserved worldwide)