Chile and the earlier September 11

M V Ramana

The Daily Times
Thursday, September 20, 2002

Last Thursday was the first anniversary of the attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York. For those who witnessed, directly or through the media, the sheer horror of airplanes filled with hundreds of innocent people being rammed into tall buildings with thousands of innocent people, the date, September 11, is not easily forgettable. In another part of the world, September 11 was already a date not to be forgotten, a reminder of yet another slaughter from 29 years ago. This was the military coup against Salvador Allende in Chile; this time the United States was on the side of the aggressors.

US involvement in Latin America goes back a long way. In 1823, President James Monroe, through what has come to be known as the Monroe doctrine, made clear that Latin America was to be in the United States sphere of influence. About eighty years later, President Theodore Roosevelt interpreted this to mean: “in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States... to the exercise of an international police power.”

The interest of the US in Latin America was for the most part due to the entrenched presence of US multinational companies. Many of these dominated — through legal and illegal means — policy making in these countries. For example, the United Fruit Company was the largest private enterprise in Guatemala and managed to exempt itself of all taxes for 99 years. The name Banana Republic did not come without a reason.

Chile was no exception. US multinationals like Kennecott Copper, Anaconda and the International Trade and Telegraph companies had operations in the country. But by the 1950s and 1960s Chile also was the site of a large, well-organised and militant labour movement. For example, in the late 1960s, following a moderate land reform act that was ineffectively implemented, thousands of peasants simply seized land and occupied it. Urban industrial workers were even more militant. In 1969 there were nearly 2000 strikes involving over 2 million workers. The following year this grew to 5000 strikes involving over 3 million workers. The possibility that such labour militancy could spread to other parts of the continent was at the bottom of the US’ concern about Chile and Washington’s desire to have a pliant domestic government that would put down such struggles.

Chile came on the “watch list” when Salvador Allende, a leftist candidate, came within three percent of winning the Chilean presidency in 1958. That was considered too dangerous and in the 1964 elections the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) pumped in over $10 million into the successful campaign of Eduardo Frei, the Christian Democratic candidate. But six years later, Allende did win the elections.

US President Richard Nixon was livid and wanted to stop Allende from becoming president. So was National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger who stated, “The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves...I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people.”

Documents that surfaced decades later reveal that in a meeting with the CIA director Richard Helms on September 15, 1970, Nixon called for covert operations to block Allende’s ascension to office and to promote a coup in Chile. Helms’ notes from the meeting are full of graphic commands: “no involvement of embassy”, “$10,000,000 available, more if necessary”, “best men we have” and “make the economy scream.” (For references see http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/latin_america/chile.htm)

But Allende did become President of Chile. A month later, a cable to the CIA station chief in Santiago stated: “It is firm and continuing policy that Allende be overthrown by a coup.” It also went on to advise that the operations were to be conducted so as to hide the “American hand”.

Hand in hand, a set of sanctions and pressures against the Allende government, including intervention at the World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, and Export-Import bank to curtail or terminate credits and loans to Chile, were formulated. From November 1970 until September 1973, the CIA spent $8 million to undermine Allende.

On September 11, 1973, a military coup deposed the Allende government and set up a military dictatorship under General Augusto Pinochet. The coup was led by extreme fascists and was ferocious. Allende was assassinated, though some maintain that he committed suicide by shooting himself with a sub-machine gun. Reaction to the coup among US officials ranged from positive to ecstatic. The Naval Attach� described it as a “day of destiny” or “our D-day”, which “was close to perfect”.

The coup set off a wave of human rights abuses. The Rettig Commission set up in 1990 described several stages of repression. In the first few weeks, thousands of Chileans sympathetic to the socialist government were detained. Many were tortured, and several hundred were tried and executed by military war tribunals. In the next stage, from 1974 to 1977, the army’s secret police squads waged a “systematic campaign to exterminate” leftist dissidents. Inside clandestine prisons, people were tortured with electric shocks, choking, confinement and even animal rape. In all, the Commission found 2279 such cases, many of who had been killed by the state. Other non-governmental groups allege that there were tens of thousands of cases of human rights abuses by the state and rightwing squads.

The quest for justice has been a long and difficult one. In 1998, Pinochet was arrested in London on charges brought by a Spanish judge. This was a remarkable advance in international human rights law since the crimes Pinochet was charged with were committed mostly in Chile and mostly against Chileans. Pinochet was returned to Chile on medical grounds in March 2000 and in July 2002 the Chilean Supreme Court dismissed the case against Pinochet because he was mentally unfit to stand trial. But the effort to bring others to justice continues.

M V Ramana is a physicist and research staff member at Princeton University’s Program on Science and Global Security. Some of his writings can be found at http://www.geocities.com/m_v_ramana/nuclear.html

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1