THE GENDER FEMINIST VIEW OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VS
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
One of the most pervasive myths of our society
is that domestic violence is something men do to women.
Solid scientific research reveals that domestic violence is
something women do to men more frequently than men do it to women.
While it is true that men account for most violence outside
the home, women instigate most domestic violence and they injure men
more frequently and more severely.
The Family Research Laboratory at the University of New
Hampshire, under grants from the National Institute of
Mental Health, recently finished the last of
three national studies on domestic violence.
The first two studies revealed results similar to the latest
study. Anyone who would like a copy of the latest study may order it
from the University of New Hampshire (ask for document V55).
The data tape and documentation of the 1975 and 1985 studies
are available from the Interuniversity Consortium For Political and
Social Research at the University of Michigan.
Original data is also available on CD-ROM from
Sociometrics, Inc. in Palo Alto, CA.
The average results in the "severe assault"
category, are reported below:
Wives
report they have been severely assaulted by husband
22 per 1000
Wives report they have severely
assaulted husband
59
per 1000
Husbands report they have been
severely assaulted by wives
32 per 1000
Husbands report they have
severely assaulted wives
18 per
1000
Husbands & wives both report
wife has been assaulted
20 per 1000
Husbands & wives both report
husband has been assaulted
44 per 1000
There are dozens of other studies that reveal similar
findings. For instance: *
Women are three times more likely than men to use weapons in
domestic violence. *
Women initiate most incidents of domestic violence. *
Women commit most child abuse and most elder abuse. *
Women hit their male children more frequently and more severely than
they hit their female children. *
Women commit most child murders and 64% of their victims are male
children. *
When women murder adults the majority of their victims are men. *
Women commit 50% of spousal murders. *
Eighty two percent of all people have their first experience of violence at the hands of their mothers.
There is much confusion about whom to believe in the debate
about domestic violence. On
one side we have women's shelter advocates and feminists who rely on
law enforcement statistics. On
the other side we have social scientists who rely on scientifically
structured studies. Unfortunately, the results of scientific studies
do not receive media attention.
America's press is seemingly more interested in political
correctness than scientific accuracy.
Therefore, the public perception, and the perception of many
well intentioned domestic violence activists, is radically skewed
away from the more balanced perception of social scientists.
The typical response of the abuse shelter feminists upon
first hearing the results of the scientific studies is to
"shoot the messenger". You can almost hear their minds
snap closed. On the
other hand, abuse shelter personnel who have not accepted the
feminist "party line" are grateful to have accurate
information upon which to implement rational programs for
prevention, intervention, and treatment of abusers and their
victims. What is
happening at the abuse shelter in your community?
We could not find studies which compare the efficacy of
scientifically based programs to programs based on feminist
politics. However we
are willing to wager that scientifically based programs are more
effective than programs guided by feminist propaganda.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN OTHER COUNTRIES
We think it is important to note that there have been the
same kind of studies done in many countries. There is cross cultural
verification that women are more violent than men in
domestic settings. When behavior has cross cultural verification it means that
it is part of human nature rather than a result of cultural
conditioning. Females
are most often the perpetrators in domestic violence in all cultures
that have been studied so far. That leads many professionals to
conclude that there is something biological about violent females in
family situations. Researchers
are now exploring the role of the "territorial imperative"
as a factor in women's violence against men.
Women see the home as their territory.
Like many other species on the planet, we humans will ignore
size difference when we experience conflict on our own territory.
So, the scientific results that reveal the violence of
American women are not unique to our culture, and do not indicate a
special pathology among American women.
World wide, women are more violent than men in domestic
settings.
Below is a summary of the most recent and significant studies
we could find about domestic violence in Canada. There were two
waves of data collection. The first was done in 1990 the second was
finished in 1992.
This study was done by "Ms." Reena Sommer, a
research associate with the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and
Evaluation. We
emphasize the"Ms" to call attention to the fact that
scientific studies of DV are dominated by female social scientists.
Someone mentioned that the figures might reveal a gender bias as if
all scientists are male. In
this field many of the recognized experts are women. FEMALE
VS. MALE PERPETRATED VIOLENCE AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALL RESPONDENTS:
A
survey of couples in Calgary, Canada found that the rate of severe
husband-to-wife violence was 4.8%, while severe
wife-to-husband violence was 10%.
Brinkerhoff & Lupri, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 13:4
(1989)
THE PROPAGANDA PROBLEM AND THE SCIENTIFIC SOLUTION
Abuse shelter advocates and feminists have severely distorted
the DV picture and deliberately produce fraudulent statistics and
disinformation. Even when they quote well grounded statistics, they
misuse the information. Here is an example: One of the favorite
statistics quoted by abuse shelter advocates is that a women is the
victim of domestic violence every 15 seconds. This statistic is
deduced from a well conducted piece of research which was published
in the Journal of Marriage and Family, a well respected professional
journal for marriage and family therapists. The Abuse Shelter
advocates arrived at this figure by using one of the conclusions of
the study, i.e., 1.8 million women suffer an assault from a husband
or boyfriend per year. What
abuse shelter advocates always ignore is another finding of the same
study, i.e., 2 million men are assaulted by a wife or girl friend
per year, which translates as, a man is the victim of domestic
violence every 14 seconds. This is typical of the wide spread deception practiced by
abuse shelter advocates. America's
press establishment is a party to this deception and shares the
blame for exacerbating the DV problem by perpetuating a false
diagnosis.
Women usually initiate domestic violence episodes (they hit
first), and women hit more frequently, as well as using weapons
three times more often then men.
This combination of violent acts means that the efforts of
finding solutions to the domestic violence problem need to focus on
female perpetrators. We
need to recognize that women are violent, Andie need nationwide
educational programs that emphasize the women's role as
perpetrators. Other
studies show that men are becoming less violent at the same time
that women are becoming more violent.
Educating men seems to be working.
Educating women to be less violent should now be the main
thrust of public education programs.
Any domestic violence program which accepts the "male
abuser - female victim" paradigm is based on a false
premise. These kind of
domestic violence programs actually perpetuate the problem of
domestic abuse and do not deserve to be supported by private
citizens or government agencies.
Many government agencies, and legitimate charities, have been
funding a feminist political cause, rather than funding rational,
solution focused, domestic violence prevention programs.
What kind of domestic violence prevention program do you have
in your community? Does
the domestic violence prevention program in your community devote as
much attention to violent females, as it does to violent males?
If not, why not?
Let us quote from a book on the subject by McNeely, R.L. and
Robinson-Simpson, G (1987) "The Truth about Domestic
Violence: A Falsely Framed Issue":
"Yet, while repeated studies consistently show that men
are victims of domestic violence at least as often as are women,
both the lay public and many professionals regard a finding of no
sex difference in rates of physical aggression among intimates as
surprising, if not unreliable, the stereotype being that men are
aggressive and women are exclusively victims."
However, part of the feminist agenda is to make men look as
bad as they can. The
American press cooperates with this libelous portrayal of men.
The feminist view of domestic violence is part of the
problem. The media
boycott of news about the scientific studies is part of the problem.
The scientific view gives us hope for solution.
Please do your part to share this very important information
with your community.
Thank you very much for your attention to this important
issue.
Sam & Bunny Sewell - e-mail [email protected]
NEWS CLIPS
Here are some exceptions to the usual media boycott of the
science based stories about domestic violence:
SPOUSE ABUSE A TWO-WAY STREET
USA Today June 29, 1994
By Warren Farrell, Ph.D.
Just as bad cases make bad laws, so can celebrity cases
reinforce old myths. The
biggest myth the O.J. Simpson case is likely to reinforce is the
myth that domestic violence is a one way street
(male-to-female), and its corollary, that male violence
against women is an outgrowth of masculinity.
When I began seven years of research into these issues in
preparation for "The Myth of Male Power", I began with
these two assumptions since I had been the only man in the United
States to have been elected three times to the Board of Directors of
the National Organization of Women in New York City, and these
assumptions went unquestioned in feminist circles.
My first findingBthat
in the U.S. and Canada more than 90% of the domestic violence
reports to the police were by women, not menBseemed
to confirm these assumptions. But,
then the picture became more complex.
About a dozen studies in the U.S. and Canada asked BOTH sexes
how often they hit each other; all of them found that women hit men
either more frequently or about as often as the reverse.
Two of the main studiesBby
Suzanne Steinmetz, Murray Strauss and Richard GellesBassumed
men hit women more severely, so they divided domestic violence into
seven different levels of severity.
They were surprised to discover that, overall, the more
severe levels of violence were conducted more by women against men.
A caveat, though. Men
hitting women did more damage than the reverse.
However, this caveat carried its own caveat: it was exactly
because men's hits hurt more that women resorted to more severe
methods (ie, tossing boiling water over her husband or swinging a
frying pan into his face). These
findings were supported by the Census Bureau's own survey:
As early as 1977, the U.S. Census Bureau conducted the
National Crime Survey. surveying 60,000 households every six months
for three and one-half years. They
found women use weapons against men 82% of the time; men use weapons
against women 25% of the time.
Overall, they found that even the women acknowledged they hit
men more than men hit women.
The key issue, though, is who initiates this cycle of
violence. Steinmetz,
Strauss and Gelles found to their initial surprise that women are
more likely to be the first initiators.
Why? In part,
the belief that men can take itBthey
can therefore be a punching bag and not be expected to hit back.
I was still a bit incredulous.
I asked thousands of men and women in my workshops to count
all the relationships in which they had hit their partner before their partner had ever it
them, and vice versa. About
60% of the women acknowledged they had more often been the first to
strike a blow. Among
the men, about 90% felt their female partner had been the first to
strike a blow.
I still felt violence was an outgrowth of masculinity.
I was half right. Male
to male violence is so much an outgrowth of masculinity we don=t abhor it, we applaud it. We
applaud Mike Tyson for his violence and then wonder we he is
violent; we applaud O.J. Simpson for his violence and then wonder
why he is violent. In
fact, we call male to male violence entertainment: football, boxing,
auto racing, ice hockey. When
we protest itBas
with bullfightingBit
is due to the damage done to the bull.
We, the people, subsidize male to male violence with our
money, respect, applause and love. Hopefully, the O.J. Simpson saga will help us understand this
without forgetting that when men and women are together, the
violence that erupts is a two-way street.
When Women Abuse Men: It's Far More Widespread Than People
Think
Excerpt from Special supplement to The Washington Post,
December 28,1993
By Armin A. Brott
"Despite all the evidence about
female-on-male violence, many groups actively try to
suppress coverage of the issue. Steinmetz received verbal threats
and anonymous phone calls from radical women's groups threatening to
harm her children after she published "The Battered Husband
Syndrome" in 1978. She says she finds it ironic that the same
people who claim that women-initiated violence is purely self
defense are so quick to threaten violence against people who do
nothing more than publish a scientific study.
Steinmetz's story is not unique. Ten years after that study,
R.L. McNeely, a professor at the School of Social Welfare at the
University of Wisconsin, and Gloria Robinson-Simpson published
"The Truth About domestic Violence: A Falsely Framed
Issue." The article examined various studies on domestic
violence and concluded that society must recognize that men are
victims "or we will be addressing only part of the
phenomenon."
Shortly thereafter, McNeely received letters from a
Pennsylvania women=s organization threatening to use its influence in Washington to pull
his research funding. Robinson-Simpson, who uncovered some of
the most important data, largely was left alone.
According to McNeely, "she, a young assistant professor,
was assumed to have been >duped= by the senior male professor." LEADING
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESEARCHER CLAIMS ABUSE SHELTER ADVOCATES MAKE THE
PROBLEM WORSE
Washington Times Jan 31, 1994
Section A, Joyce Price
Murray A. Straus, a sociologist and co-director for the
Family Research Laboratory at the University of New Hampshire,
blames "women in the battered [women's] shelter movement"
for denying that women physically abuse husbands, ex-husbands
and boyfriends, or playing down such abuse.
"There's this fiction in the shelter movement that in
all cases, it=s him, not her" who's responsible for domestic assaults, Mr. Straus
said in a recent interview.
Mr. Straus said at least 30 studies of domestic violence - including some he's conducted
- have shown both sexes
to be equally culpable. Bathe said some of the research, such as a
recent Canadian national survey,"left out data on women abusing
men... because it's politically embarrassing."
Women and men "are almost identical" in terms of
the frequency of attacks such as slapping, shoving, and kicking, Mr.
Straus said.
Using information on married couples obtained from 2,994
women in the 1985 National Family Violence Survey, Mr. Straus said
he found a rate for assaults by wives of 124 per 1,000 couples,
compared with 122 per 1,000 for assaults by husbands.
The rate of minor assaults by wives was 78 per 1,000 couples,
and the rate of minor assaults by husbands was 72 per 1,000, he
said. For the category of severe assaults, he said, the rate was 46
per 1,000 couples for assaults by wives and 50 per 1,000 for
assaults by husbands.
"Neither difference is statistically different,"
Mr. Straus wrote in the Journal Issues in Definition and
Measurement. "As these rates are based exclusively on
information provided by women respondents, the near equality in
assault rates cannot be attributed to a gender bias in
reporting."
Dr. Straus's comments do not reflect the 1995 National Family
Violence Survey
WOMEN AND MEN EQUALLY AT FAULT FOR DOMESTIC ABUSE
The article given below appeared in the Albany Times Union.
It was written by Judith Sherven and James Sniechowski of Los
Angeles. She is a clinical psychologist and he also holds a
doctorate in the behavioral sciences.
Once again, the myth of the evil brutal male perpetrator and
the perfect, innocent female victim is being broadcast and written
about as gospel. The discussion is national. The rage and sorrow,
palpable. Only when we come to terms with the fact that domestic
violence is the responsibility of both men and women, however, can
we put a stop to this horrible nightmare.
Domestic violence is not an either‑or phenomenon. It is
not either the man's fault or the women's. It is a both‑and
problem. Both male and the female are bound in their dance of mutual
destructiveness, their incapacity for intimacy and appreciation of
differences. They need each other to perpetuate personal and
collective dramas of victimization and lovelessness, and so,
regrettably, neither can leave.
This is a very untidy idea for people who have grown up with
movies in which the "good guy" triumphs over the "bad
guy" rescues the damsel from distress. But to tackle the plague
of domestic violence, we must alter our perspectives.
Facts:
Half of spousal murders are committed by wives, a statistic
that has been stable over time. The l985 National Family Violence Survey, funded by the
National Institute of Mental Health and supported by many other
surveys, disclosed that women and men were physically abusing one
another in roughly equal numbers. Wives reported that they were more
often the aggressors. Using weapons to make up for physical
disadvantage, they were not just fighting back.
While 1.8 million women annually suffered one or more
assaults from a husband or boyfriend, 2 million men were assaulted
by a wife or girlfriend, according to a l986 study on U. S. family
violence published in the Journal of Marriage and Family. That study
also found that 54 percent of all violence termed "severe"
was by women.
The Journal for the National Association of Social Workers
found in 1986 that among teenagers who date, girls were violent more
frequently than boys.
Mothers abuse their children at a rate approaching twice that
of fathers, according to state child‑protective service
agencies surveyed by the Children's Rights Coalition.
Because men have been taught to "take it like a
man" and are ridiculed when they feel they have been battered
by women, women are nine times more likely to report their abusers
to the authorities.
In l988, R. L. McNeeley, a professor at the School of Social
Welfare of the University of Wisconsin, published "The Truth
About Domestic violence: A Falsely Framed Issue" again revealing
the level of violence against men by women. Such facts, though, are
"politically incorrect". Even 10 years earlier, Susan
Steinmetz , director of the Family Research Institute at Indiana
University‑Purdue University received threats of harm to her
children from radical women's groups after she published "The
Battered Husband Syndrome".
Why are we, as a culture, loath to expose the responsibility of
women in domestic abuse? Why do we cling to the pure and virginal
image of the "sweet young thing" and the "damsel in
distress"? If we are sincere about change, we must acknowledge
the truth: Women are part and parcel of domestic violence. The women's movement claims its goal to be equal rights for
women. If that is so, then women must share responsibility for their
behavior and their contribution to domestic violence.
Otherwise, we remain in a distortion that overshadows the
truth. Only the truth will show us the way out of the epidemic of
violence that is destroying our families and our nation.
Brought to you by - THE 'LECTRIC LAW LIBRARY(tm)The Net's
Finest Legal Resource For Legal Pros & Laypeople Alike.WWW:
http://www.lectlaw.com --
e-mail: [email protected] Don Hank Director,
LYNCUP
|