In
the spring of 2000 I audited an on-line course in violence against
women offered by Harvard Law School. The general tenor of the course
was that our culture must change to save women from violence.
Underlying the curriculum was the subtle theme that without
eliminating traditional Christianity and the traditional family, it
would be impossible to effectively combat violence against women,
which includes Asubtle@
forms such as denying women abortions and denying them equal
opportunities on the workplace. Participants were invited to suggest ways to eliminate this
violence, and encouraged by the course material, including writings by
such radical feminists as Andrea Dworkin, not surprisingly, many
suggested we need to eliminate traditional marriage and encourage
women to have children out of wedlock. As studies show, this puts
children at risk. Yet our most prestigious institution of higher
learning was promoting family breakdown. I
was not surprised. I had
attended a meeting in Lancaster on DV, at which Tom Ridge=s
wife Michelle, a graduate of Harvard, had spoken. She had stated that
every woman in Pennsylvania is Aat
risk@
of domestic violence. From
Woman Hating by Andrea Dworkin, Penguin Books, 1974 p.
189, Chapter entitled "Androgyny, Androgyne F.....ng and
Community" Subheading:
Incest AI
was coldBlater
revolted a little, not muchBseemed
perhaps a good idea to tryBknow
the Monster of the Beginning WombBPerhapsBthat
way. Would she care? She needs a lover. Allen
Ginsberg, Kaddish@ AThe
parent-child relationship is primarily erotic because all human
relationships are primarily erotic. The incest taboo is a
particularized form of repression, one which functions as the bulwark
of all the other repressions. The incest taboo ensures that however
free we become, we never become genuinely free. The incest taboo,
because it denies us essential fulfillment with the parents whom we
love with our primary energy, forces us to internalize those parents
and constantly seek them, or seek to negate them, in the minds, bodies
and hearts of other humans who are not our parents and never will be. AThe
incest taboo does the worst work of the culture: it teaches us the
mechanisms of repressing and internalizing erotic feelingB
it forces us to develop those mechanisms in the first place; it forces
us to particularize sexual feeling, so that it congeals into a need
for a particular sexual Aobject@;
it demands that we place the nuclear family above the human family.
The destruction of the incest taboo is essential to the
development of cooperative human community based on free-flow of
natural and androgynous eroticism. AThe
Family AFor
if we grant that the sexual drive is at birth diffuse and
undifferentiated from the total personality (Freud=s
Apolymorphous
perversity@)
and ... becomes differentiated only in response to the incest taboo;
and that... the incest taboo is now necessarily only in order to
preserve the family; and if we did away with the family we would in
effect be doing away with repressions that mold sexuality into
specific formations.
Shulamith
Firestone The
Dialectics of Sex AThe
incest taboo can be destroyed only by destroying the nuclear family as
the primary institution of the culture. The nuclear family is the school
of values in a sexist, sexually repressed society... The alternative to
the nuclear family at the moment is the extended family or the tribe.
The growth of tribe is part of the process of destroying particularized
roles and fixed erotic identity. As people develop fluid androgynous
identity, they will also develop the forms of community appropriate to
it. We cannot really imagine what those forms will be.@ It
is clear from the above that Andrea Dworkin, who Gloria Steinem
said is the person who best articulates feminism, is advocating
family breakdown and even parent-child incest. The notion of fathers
being encouraged to have incest would probably seem incongruous with the
agenda of combating violence against women. Yet this author was chosen
over hundreds of other experts by Harvard Law School to speak as an
authority on violence against women. Clearly
this could not have happened if Harvard were truly concerned with
combating violence. The fact that Dworkin so candidly states her agenda
of destroying the nuclear family tells anyone with a hint of common
sense that the Harvard agenda, like Dworkin=s,
is family breakdown. Every
American should be aware of this agenda on the part of influential
feminist leaders in our most prestigious institutions and should do
everything in their power to keep these people from further implementing
their agenda. The main reason domestic violence is emphasized is to
persuade judges to continue to deny fathers custody. The National
Fatherhood Initiative and other groups like it have shown that children
growing up without a traditional family (fatherless) are at risk of drug
abuse, crime, failure in school, teen pregnancy, teen suicide and
violence (http://www.vix.com/men/nofather/nodad.html). Yet using DV as
an excuse, the feminists still have a powerful weapon to fight
fatherhood and keep the money flowing in the form of Achild@
support to women. This
keeps lawyers in the chips. Divorce is a multi-billion dollar industry
and Achild@ support is the key to the money exchange. No wonder the most
prestigious law school in the country wants you to believe men are the
perennial oppressors and women their hapless victims. If you are a man who has been unfairly evicted from your home, or if you are a woman who has unfairly evicted your ex or husband under pressure from a lawyer or public servant (eg, shelter for abused women employee), or even if you have had a positive experience with local social services, please share your story with us.
Don Hank Director,
LYNCUP
|