1.

4/3/2008 2:32:00 AM

I like the online process.

2.

4/3/2008 2:50:00 AM

very well done

3.

4/3/2008 3:04:00 PM

I didn't like to be forced to enter a positive number on #47

4.

4/3/2008 4:06:00 PM

excellent work...covers subject matter well

5.

4/3/2008 9:45:00 PM

Great job - easy to coordinate with the Plan and easy to follow. I do wish some dollar amounts could have been assigned to some of the project. Without costs, it is a wish list and not a true indication of what people are willing to pay for. Maybe next, costs and priorities!

6.

4/3/2008 10:52:00 PM

There has obviously been a lot of thought given to how to deal with very different points of view from both golfers and non-golfers.

7.

4/3/2008 11:24:00 PM

A bit long.

8.

4/4/2008 4:50:00 PM

covered most of what concerns me

9.

4/6/2008 3:16:00 AM

No space for funding comments, make everyone pays, then I will.

10.

4/6/2008 7:12:00 AM

We should have had such a survey before someone hired an "Architech"

11.

4/6/2008 6:42:00 PM

Thank you, Bob Martin, for your hard work

12.

4/7/2008 1:04:00 AM

With all the information on the GCMP and architect info I feel the survey is very well done and I have been able to present my feelings thoroughly.

13.

4/10/2008 7:47:00 PM

This took a lot of work and is very helpful for everyone to express an opinion.

14.

4/11/2008 11:05:00 PM

Need good follow-up

15.

4/16/2008 4:49:00 PM

I believe that the questions of how to pay for priojects should be addressed first in the survey as they can influence the other questions. Otherwise a good job.

16.

4/16/2008 5:20:00 PM

very thorough, but overwhelming.

17.

4/16/2008 5:58:00 PM

Once we come up with the survey results, LET'S DO SOMETHING!

18.

4/16/2008 8:52:00 PM

Well written and easy to understand

19.

4/16/2008 11:34:00 PM

combined funding opinions, were confusing.

20.

4/17/2008 1:36:00 PM

Good survey.... ' Hope you get god feedback... and many respondents

21.

4/18/2008 1:49:00 AM

Not enough cost information

22.

4/19/2008 6:09:00 PM

Lack of estimated cost and downtime impacts

23.

4/20/2008 3:45:00 AM

Current course is fine with me.

24.

4/20/2008 2:10:00 PM

It was very difficult finding the survey in order to fill it out. You seem to be more interested in reaching the golfers than all of the home owners

25.

4/21/2008 1:44:00 AM

Good easy to understand survey. Thank you

26.

4/21/2008 7:44:00 PM

I think it is a fair way to ask what we think

27.

4/21/2008 11:37:00 PM

I appreciate the time to do a paper survey

28.

4/23/2008 4:53:00 AM

Very long

29.

4/23/2008 6:48:00 PM

The golf course improves the value of all residents and all residents should be assessed to pay for improvements

30.

4/23/2008 10:29:00 PM

I think the survey is excellent!! I do have a problem with the master plan. Projects should be prioritized and costed out on the basis of must haves to improve existing course vs nice to haves. I am not willing to fund a bunch of nice to haves! I am willing to fund priorities!

31.

4/25/2008 2:50:00 PM

if our opinion means anyting

32.

4/25/2008 10:06:00 PM

thanks Bob & your committee