Question #41 - Expansion of the creek towards the green with sporadically placed boulders in the far slope to accentuate this dramatic feature that contains the natural waterfall to the left. This would bring the creek into view from the landing area.
1.	4/3/2008 5:18:00 PM	not needed
2.	4/3/2008 9:40:00 PM	It might make the hole more difficult for me, but, I like the esthetic effect!
3.	4/4/2008 5:44:00 PM	I think it looks great now
4.	4/6/2008 12:35:00 AM	Would add to the design of the course and make it much more attractive to the golfers
5.	4/6/2008 3:12:00 AM	Good hole now, doesn't need anything but care.
6.	4/6/2008 6:56:00 AM	This was tried to enlarge and make a pond but there is not sufficient water flowing to make this work. It would just beome another stagnate pond. Leave it alone.
7.	4/6/2008 6:29:00 PM	Nice hole as is
8.	4/6/2008 11:58:00 PM	Let's not make the creek too wide
9.	4/10/2008 8:39:00 PM	A lot of golfers I see have a tought enough time getting to this green. The boulders would block their way.
10.	4/10/2008 8:54:00 PM	We tried to make a lake (small) and no one liked it. Duh!
11.	4/13/2008 6:25:00 PM	In Favor - But will create problems for some of the golfers
12.	4/15/2008 9:54:00 PM	Cut back the shubs along the creek on the left.
13.	4/16/2008 12:10:00 AM	leave it alone, its dramatic enough
14.	4/16/2008 8:36:00 PM	another low priority
15.	4/19/2008 5:47:00 PM	Depends on cost impact and downtime estimates
16.	4/20/2008 1:16:00 AM	This could be very attractive, at low cost.
17.	4/21/2008 4:42:00 PM	wasted spending
18.	4/21/2008 7:39:00 PM	A big waste of money
19.	4/22/2008 9:57:00 PM	Cleaning out the brush & some trees would do the same thing.
20.	4/22/2008 10:58:00 PM	The creek is wide enough now but a little beautification is good if it doesn't cost too much.
21.	4/23/2008 3:21:00 AM	This would be a nice scenic touch
22.	4/23/2008 6:03:00 PM	was this not tried and then abandoned after flooding?
23.	4/23/2008 10:16:00 PM	Wait to other priorities are addressed
24.	4/23/2008 11:12:00 PM	This is one of those "nice to do" items - down the line.
25.	4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM	just glitz not necessary
26.	4/25/2008 10:05:00 PM	For beautification only.
27.	4/25/2008 10:31:00 PM	OK as is
28.	4/27/2008 3:49:00 AM	Should be a priority after all the necessary "fixes."

Question #41 - Expansion of the creek towards the green with sporadically placed boulders in the far slope to accentuate this dramatic feature that contains the natural waterfall to the left. This would bring the creek into view from the landing area.

Response Date

Comment:

4/3/2008 5:18:00 PM

not needed

4/3/2008 9:40:00 PM

It might make the hole more difficult for me, but, I like the esthetic effect!

4/4/2008 5:44:00 PM

I think it looks great now

4/6/2008 12:35:00 AM

Would add to the design of the course and make it much more attractive to the golfers

4/6/2008 3:12:00 AM

Good hole now, doesn't need anything but care.

4/6/2008 6:56:00 AM

This was tried to enlarge and make a pond but there is not sufficient water flowing to make this work. It would just beome another stagnate pond. Leave it alone.

4/6/2008 6:29:00 PM

Nice hole as is

4/6/2008 11:58:00 PM

Let's not make the creek too wide

4/10/2008 8:39:00 PM

A lot of golfers I see have a tought enough time getting to this green. The boulders would block their way.

10.

4/10/2008 8:54:00 PM

We tried to make a lake (small) and no one liked it. Duh!

11.

4/13/2008 6:25:00 PM

In Favor - But will create problems for some of the golfers

12.

4/15/2008 9:54:00 PM

Cut back the shubs along the creek on the left.

13.

4/16/2008 12:10:00 AM

leave it alone, its dramatic enough

14.

4/16/2008 8:36:00 PM

another low priority

15.

4/19/2008 5:47:00 PM

Depends on cost impact and downtime estimates

16.

4/20/2008 1:16:00 AM

This could be very attractive, at low cost.

17.

4/21/2008 4:42:00 PM

wasted spending

18.

4/21/2008 7:39:00 PM

A big waste of money

19.

4/22/2008 9:57:00 PM

Cleaning out the brush & some trees would do the same thing.

20.

4/22/2008 10:58:00 PM

The creek is wide enough now but a little beautification is good if it doesn't cost too much.

21.

4/23/2008 3:21:00 AM

This would be a nice scenic touch

22.

4/23/2008 6:03:00 PM

was this not tried and then abandoned after flooding?

23.

4/23/2008 10:16:00 PM

Wait to other priorities are addressed

24.

4/23/2008 11:12:00 PM

This is one of those "nice to do" items - down the line.

25.

4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM

just glitz not necessary

26.

4/25/2008 10:05:00 PM

For beautification only.

27.

4/25/2008 10:31:00 PM

OK as is

28.

4/27/2008 3:49:00 AM

Should be a priority after all the necessary "fixes."