Question #40 - On Hole #15, the architect recommended "lowering of the raised area in the fairway to enhance visibility into the second landing area and green.
1.	4/3/2008 2:44:00 AM	15 is boring; needs rocks, fake stream or somethng
2.	4/3/2008 3:40:00 PM	High cost for small improvement.
3.	4/3/2008 5:17:00 PM	not needed
4.	4/3/2008 9:39:00 PM	Not at the top of my list.
5.	4/6/2008 3:11:00 AM	Not necessary.
6.	4/6/2008 6:54:00 AM	Again, this is part of the difficulty of the hole. It creates a blind shot from back in the fairway, and it make the hole more difficult. Why take it out, just to make it easier. I say no.
7.	4/6/2008 6:28:00 PM	Not necessary
8.	4/6/2008 11:57:00 PM	No need
9.	4/6/2008 11:08:00 PM	"The second landing area" for whom? I would prefeer to see a stream or pond on this hole which has always been a "wet" problem.
10.	4/7/2008 12:58:00 AM	Not much of a concern for my handicap
11.	4/10/2008 4:27:00 AM	Not of any consequence if it stays the same as it is
12.	4/15/2008 8:48:00 PM	Don't understand what he has in mind.
13.	4/16/2008 12:08:00 AM	ok as is,we already spent a small fortune on this fairway
14.	4/16/2008 7:11:00 PM	would affect drainage. Leave it alone!
15.	4/16/2008 8:36:00 PM	low priority for dollars
16.	4/19/2008 5:46:00 PM	Depends on cost impact and downtime estimates
17.	4/19/2008 8:59:00 PM	Very low on priority list
18.	4/20/2008 1:16:00 AM	I like this fairway the way it is.
19.	4/20/2008 2:05:00 PM	Again, the architect seems fickle.
20.	4/21/2008 4:42:00 PM	wasted spending
21.	4/21/2008 5:09:00 PM	do something this is a very boring hole
22.	4/21/2008 7:38:00 PM	Lowering it would just make another low spot to add drainage to. I like the 100 yard hill, easy to hit from
23.	4/22/2008 9:57:00 PM	Do not like all the other changes that go with this one. This question is mis-leading with mentioning the other changes. This hole is great as-is!!
24.	4/22/2008 10:56:00 PM	Cost versus value.
25.	4/23/2008 10:15:00 PM	Not sure what ROI would be?
26.	4/23/2008 11:11:00 PM	Not sure if this would be a value added expenditure.
27.	4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM	do not disturb terrain
28.	4/25/2008 2:59:00 PM	above
29.	4/25/2008 10:04:00 PM	Priority - none.
30.	4/27/2008 9:17:00 PM	Not needed

Question #40 - On Hole #15, the architect recommended "lowering of the raised area in the fairway to enhance visibility into the second landing area and green.

Response Date

Comment:

4/3/2008 2:44:00 AM

15 is boring; needs rocks, fake stream or somethng

4/3/2008 3:40:00 PM

High cost for small improvement.

4/3/2008 5:17:00 PM

not needed

4/3/2008 9:39:00 PM

Not at the top of my list.

4/6/2008 3:11:00 AM

Not necessary.

4/6/2008 6:54:00 AM

Again, this is part of the difficulty of the hole. It creates a blind shot from back in the fairway, and it make the hole more difficult. Why take it out, just to make it easier. I say no.

4/6/2008 6:28:00 PM

Not necessary

4/6/2008 11:57:00 PM

No need

4/6/2008 11:08:00 PM

"The second landing area" for whom? I would prefeer to see a stream or pond on this hole which has always been a "wet" problem.

10.

4/7/2008 12:58:00 AM

Not much of a concern for my handicap

11.

4/10/2008 4:27:00 AM

Not of any consequence if it stays the same as it is

12.

4/15/2008 8:48:00 PM

Don't understand what he has in mind.

13.

4/16/2008 12:08:00 AM

ok as is,we already spent a small fortune on this fairway

14.

4/16/2008 7:11:00 PM

would affect drainage. Leave it alone!

15.

4/16/2008 8:36:00 PM

low priority for dollars

16.

4/19/2008 5:46:00 PM

Depends on cost impact and downtime estimates

17.

4/19/2008 8:59:00 PM

Very low on priority list

18.

4/20/2008 1:16:00 AM

I like this fairway the way it is.

19.

4/20/2008 2:05:00 PM

Again, the architect seems fickle.

20.

4/21/2008 4:42:00 PM

wasted spending

21.

4/21/2008 5:09:00 PM

do something this is a very boring hole

22.

4/21/2008 7:38:00 PM

Lowering it would just make another low spot to add drainage to. I like the 100 yard hill, easy to hit from

23.

4/22/2008 9:57:00 PM

Do not like all the other changes that go with this one. This question is mis-leading with mentioning the other changes. This hole is great as-is!!

24.

4/22/2008 10:56:00 PM

Cost versus value.

25.

4/23/2008 10:15:00 PM

Not sure what ROI would be?

26.

4/23/2008 11:11:00 PM

Not sure if this would be a value added expenditure.

27.

4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM

do not disturb terrain

28.

4/25/2008 2:59:00 PM

above

29.

4/25/2008 10:04:00 PM

Priority - none.

30.

4/27/2008 9:17:00 PM

Not needed