1.

4/3/2008 2:41:00 AM

not necessary and ugly

2.

4/3/2008 3:38:00 PM

Makes sense. Building a tee with no cart access is not very wise

3.

4/3/2008 5:16:00 PM

This should not be too expensive.

4.

4/3/2008 6:09:00 PM

This is just plain silly --Who goes to the pump house anyway and how often

5.

4/5/2008 2:52:00 PM

path not to caver 12" water main

6.

4/6/2008 3:10:00 AM

Less wear and tear on grass area.

7.

4/6/2008 6:50:00 AM

Good idea

8.

4/6/2008 11:56:00 PM

Only if the forward tees are used, The path will prevent some wear on the fairawy

9.

4/16/2008 12:06:00 AM

trucks drive on the fairways now/cross paths not good

10.

4/16/2008 7:09:00 PM

need to provide visibility from upper tee for safety!!!

11.

4/16/2008 8:36:00 PM

not a priority

12.

4/16/2008 9:20:00 PM

someday?

13.

4/20/2008 1:14:00 AM

The drainage here makes this a rally good idea

14.

4/21/2008 4:41:00 PM

makes sense

15.

4/21/2008 5:08:00 PM

path OK tee absolutely NO

16.

4/21/2008 7:36:00 PM

would speed up play and save walking

17.

4/21/2008 11:22:00 PM

continue to middle of fairway

18.

4/21/2008 11:45:00 PM

Would like to see a new tee on #12 behind and to the left of 11th green, thus making the tee shot over the water.

19.

4/22/2008 9:57:00 PM

Capital improvements and reserves established??

20.

4/22/2008 10:55:00 PM

If this keeps trucks off the course, it's good.

21.

4/23/2008 4:03:00 AM

My opinion another course maintenance issue.

22.

4/23/2008 11:10:00 PM

Not high on my list of priorities but would be a "nice to do" in time.

23.

4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM

cost? how many use forward tees?

24.

4/25/2008 2:48:00 PM

forward tee are not necessary