1.

4/3/2008 3:35:00 PM

This is a safety issue! It also eliminates an eyesore and one of our biggest playability problems that slows play.

2.

4/3/2008 5:11:00 PM

In favor of it but consider it to be a low priority item.

3.

4/3/2008 6:49:00 PM

Build wall deep enough to keep out burrowing animals

4.

4/3/2008 6:54:00 PM

this is a must do item

5.

4/3/2008 7:05:00 PM

should be a top priority. I would help with project.

6.

4/3/2008 7:15:00 PM

If you don't know where the water is as a person taking this survey you have bigger problems than a golf score.

7.

4/3/2008 9:37:00 PM

As long as it doesn't make it a wider space to hit over....

8.

4/3/2008 10:36:00 PM

needede

9.

4/5/2008 2:50:00 PM

add muskrat barrier wire mess behind the rock wall Top of wall high enough so mthat

10.

4/6/2008 12:32:00 PM

This should be a #1 project due to the hazardous condition caused by the erotion. Golfers have fallen in holes caused by eroton and burroughing animals

11.

4/6/2008 3:08:00 AM

Should have been done years ago.

12.

4/6/2008 6:45:00 AM

Get rid of the grasses, but keep the rock bank flush with the elevation of the existing turf such that balls can bounce or roll back into the pond. This is basic character of that hole.

13.

4/6/2008 6:24:00 PM

We hate those shrubs on #12

14.

4/6/2008 11:55:00 PM

Something needs to be done as the bank is eroding

15.

4/6/2008 11:08:00 PM

Too expensive

16.

4/7/2008 12:58:00 AM

To me not a high priority relative to the cost.

17.

4/9/2008 6:07:00 PM

Extensive comment. See original.

18.

4/9/2008 7:53:00 PM

Water current deteriorated the current rock wall.

19.

4/11/2008 11:02:00 PM

Delay means trouble.

20.

4/15/2008 11:58:00 PM

don't see the need for this expense

21.

4/16/2008 5:18:00 PM

the sooner the better

22.

4/16/2008 5:56:00 PM

This is the most beautiful hole on the copurse. The bridge should be a rock bridge as on #8.

23.

4/16/2008 7:00:00 PM

good idea. Is it cost effective?

24.

4/16/2008 8:35:00 PM

good idea

25.

4/16/2008 9:20:00 PM

ASAP when pond is dredged

26.

4/17/2008 1:31:00 AM

It's a safety hazard as it is now.

27.

4/19/2008 8:58:00 PM

More balls lost from hitting wall

28.

4/19/2008 10:50:00 PM

Way past due.

29.

4/20/2008 1:13:00 AM

I think the aesthetics of this could be beneficial

30.

4/20/2008 2:02:00 PM

In favor of stabilizing the slope, not because it would create visual definition.

31.

4/21/2008 4:41:00 PM

wasted spending

32.

4/21/2008 5:04:00 PM

again a waqste of money

33.

4/21/2008 7:35:00 PM

Sounds pretty

34.

4/22/2008 7:04:00 PM

I enjoy the visual affects & playability as it is now.

35.

4/23/2008 7:51:00 PM

will create too hard a second shot for high h'cpers and slow down play

36.

4/23/2008 10:11:00 PM

Not a high priority

37.

4/23/2008 11:07:00 PM

The current condition of the lakeside is poor. Animal damage is constant and if the construction of the wall will deter the animals and eliminate the deterioration let's do it. The current condition of the hillside with all the animal holes creates a safety issue for the players trying to traverse the area.

38.

4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM

just remove pot bunker cost to do this is way too much

39.

4/25/2008 2:59:00 PM

great idea

40.

4/25/2008 8:57:00 PM

rock wall was installed at that location years ago

41.

4/25/2008 10:30:00 PM

rocks or RR ties would be good

42.

4/27/2008 3:49:00 AM

I don't understand how a rock wall will stabilize the slope. I think the visual definition of the water hazard is pretty clear now.