|
Question #33 - It is proposed to add a 5-6 foot hedge between the road and the back tee on Hole 9 to create separation and privacy for golfers. It is also proposed to extend this hedge down the left side of the tee to create screening and separation from the driveway of the adjoining home. |
||
|
# |
Response Date |
Comment: |
|
1. |
4/3/2008 3:33:00 PM |
This is a golf course. Screen this tee from annoying traffic |
|
2. |
4/3/2008 7:11:00 PM |
Screening from the driveway is fine. But blocking from the street is ridiculous. Next, you will block the green on 8 so putting golfers won't be disturbed. |
|
3. |
4/3/2008 9:23:00 PM |
For the homeowner, yes. For the golfer, so what? |
|
4. |
4/3/2008 9:34:00 PM |
Again, LWW Dr. is a very busy road and is quite noisy and the apparent separation would be a positive change. |
|
5. |
4/6/2008 3:07:00 AM |
Only with the home owners approval only. |
|
6. |
4/6/2008 6:35:00 AM |
There is already a shade tree there. Don't take that out. |
|
7. |
4/6/2008 6:20:00 PM |
Should be decided by homeowners near the tee |
|
8. |
4/6/2008 11:03:00 PM |
How do the Riels feel about this?! |
|
9. |
4/9/2008 4:22:00 AM |
Traffic hazard |
|
10. |
4/9/2008 7:50:00 PM |
Next to the road - yes. Next to the home - no |
|
11. |
4/11/2008 11:15:00 PM |
We all don't need privacy! |
|
12. |
4/13/2008 6:21:00 PM |
Not needed |
|
13. |
4/15/2008 11:54:00 PM |
may reduce people blowing horns while we tee off |
|
14. |
4/16/2008 4:30:00 PM |
They won't grow in one lifetime! |
|
15. |
4/16/2008 4:31:00 PM |
I seee no need for this |
|
16. |
4/16/2008 5:55:00 PM |
By putting up all these 5-6 ft. hedges, are we blocking the view of the course from the road on all these holes? |
|
17. |
4/16/2008 8:34:00 PM |
NO! |
|
18. |
4/19/2008 5:04:00 PM |
See above |
|
19. |
4/20/2008 1:11:00 AM |
This is a great idea. Twice,I've seen passing motorists deliberately honk their horns in the middle of someone's backswing |
|
20. |
4/20/2008 3:41:00 AM |
We don't need privacy. |
|
21. |
4/20/2008 2:01:00 PM |
GOLFERS DO NOT NEED PRIVACY! |
|
22. |
4/21/2008 1:23:00 AM |
Not necessary |
|
23. |
4/21/2008 4:40:00 PM |
makes sense |
|
24. |
4/21/2008 5:00:00 PM |
nice idea but ask the home owner |
|
25. |
4/21/2008 7:32:00 PM |
Good Idea |
|
26. |
4/22/2008 7:03:00 PM |
Not needed. |
|
27. |
4/22/2008 10:48:00 PM |
See 31. Left side hedge is of no great valueexcept to one property owner. |
|
28. |
4/23/2008 3:18:00 AM |
same |
|
29. |
4/23/2008 11:02:00 PM |
As long as the homeowner is agreeable. I think all the holes that border the street should have some sort of separation as long as it doesn't create a new problem! |
|
30. |
4/23/2008 11:11:00 PM |
I don't think it's necessary to hedge the side by the house. |
|
31. |
4/25/2008 1:45:00 PM |
add hedge in back do not extend down the side |
|
32. |
4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM |
if wally reil wants hedge let hi put it in..this course runs thru homes, so what? their choice to live on course!!! |
|
33. |
4/25/2008 2:48:00 PM |
a fence would be more affective than trees, could provide some protection and reduce liability for LWW |
|
34. |
4/25/2008 2:58:00 PM |
ditto |
|
35. |
4/25/2008 10:03:00 PM |
Yes - in-house labor. |
|
36. |
4/25/2008 10:28:00 PM |
home owner should add screening |