|
Question #32 - It is proposed to remove the "overgrown" hedge behind the back tee on Hole #3 and replace it with appropriate shrubs that can be maintained at a 5-6 foot height to create separation from the road and privacy for the golfers on the tee. |
||
|
# |
Response Date |
Comment: |
|
1. |
4/3/2008 2:37:00 AM |
Top and maintain what's currently there |
|
2. |
4/3/2008 3:33:00 PM |
This ia a golf course. Screen this tee from annoying traffic |
|
3. |
4/3/2008 5:07:00 PM |
The current hedge seems fine to me. |
|
4. |
4/3/2008 7:11:00 PM |
Trim the shrubs/trees. |
|
5. |
4/3/2008 7:52:00 PM |
Add to the exsisting hedge |
|
6. |
4/3/2008 9:23:00 PM |
Current hedge answers all the needs of the new hedge. |
|
7. |
4/3/2008 9:34:00 PM |
Not just privacy, but noise on that tee - there is a lot of traffic and it can be distracting. |
|
8. |
4/3/2008 11:19:00 PM |
I like it the way it is. Provides plenty of privacy currently |
|
9. |
4/6/2008 3:07:00 AM |
But, some players are bothered by traffic. |
|
10. |
4/6/2008 6:35:00 AM |
This is dumb. It can't cost less to take out the current trees and then replace them with new trees, than to just maintain the current trees. This is just bad thinking. The Architect didn't lilke the leylandy Cypress trees there, that is why he recommened this change. |
|
11. |
4/6/2008 6:20:00 PM |
Existing hedge looks okay to me |
|
12. |
4/6/2008 11:53:00 PM |
Just extend the current hedge |
|
13. |
4/8/2008 5:19:00 AM |
It works fine the way it is. |
|
14. |
4/9/2008 6:05:00 PM |
Extensive comment. See original. |
|
15. |
4/9/2008 9:33:00 PM |
trim existing hedge |
|
16. |
4/10/2008 3:53:00 AM |
what we have in place works...replace it only when necessary |
|
17. |
4/10/2008 8:37:00 PM |
Can you not cut the existing trees like a tall hedge |
|
18. |
4/11/2008 11:15:00 PM |
It's fine as it is!! |
|
19. |
4/13/2008 3:06:00 AM |
removing here what you are trying to put in place on #2 |
|
20. |
4/13/2008 6:21:00 PM |
Are just looking for ways to spend $ |
|
21. |
4/15/2008 8:40:00 PM |
Whatis wrong with the hedge that is there? |
|
22. |
4/15/2008 9:47:00 PM |
The current hedge is good shade in the summer. |
|
23. |
4/15/2008 11:54:00 PM |
leave this shade alone, we need it in summer while waiting |
|
24. |
4/16/2008 4:30:00 PM |
Stupid! |
|
25. |
4/16/2008 4:31:00 PM |
I dont see a problem with the existing hedge |
|
26. |
4/16/2008 5:55:00 PM |
Put the hedge from existing trees to the drinking fountain. |
|
27. |
4/16/2008 8:34:00 PM |
present hedge is OK |
|
28. |
4/16/2008 11:00:00 PM |
Do not see a problem with the way it is. |
|
29. |
4/17/2008 1:29:00 AM |
Why take down something that works just to put another something similar in its place? Dumb. |
|
30. |
4/17/2008 1:22:00 PM |
opposed only because money spent better elsewhere |
|
31. |
4/17/2008 10:35:00 PM |
I don't see it as overgrown |
|
32. |
4/19/2008 5:04:00 PM |
See above |
|
33. |
4/19/2008 9:20:00 PM |
There already is a hedge , manicure and extend it. |
|
34. |
4/19/2008 10:49:00 PM |
Trim up existing. |
|
35. |
4/20/2008 12:41:00 AM |
Can't it just be trimmed back substantially now, and then maintained at a reasonable size moving forward? |
|
36. |
4/20/2008 1:11:00 AM |
I don't see a problem with the shrubbery there now. |
|
37. |
4/20/2008 2:01:00 PM |
Trim the existing hedge. Golfers do not need privacy. They are on a golf course, not in a hot tub! No one is sitting there judging what a bad shot they made. We have better things to do with our time. |
|
38. |
4/21/2008 1:23:00 AM |
Why don't you cut back the existing hedges? |
|
39. |
4/21/2008 4:40:00 PM |
makes sense |
|
40. |
4/21/2008 5:00:00 PM |
why not simply trim the hedge? |
|
41. |
4/21/2008 7:32:00 PM |
Why not leave the tree hedge and extend it all the way to the cart pathwith a 5' style |
|
42. |
4/21/2008 11:09:00 PM |
Existing hedge is adequate |
|
43. |
4/21/2008 11:29:00 PM |
Trim existing hedge |
|
44. |
4/22/2008 7:03:00 PM |
What we have is satisfactory. |
|
45. |
4/22/2008 10:48:00 PM |
Not of great value. |
|
46. |
4/23/2008 3:18:00 AM |
same as item 31 |
|
47. |
4/23/2008 10:09:00 PM |
It now provides privacy why change it |
|
48. |
4/23/2008 11:02:00 PM |
This really a "nice to do" and I would put it way back on the list of priorities. |
|
49. |
4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM |
trim to good size and maintain better! |
|
50. |
4/25/2008 2:48:00 PM |
not necessary |
|
51. |
4/25/2008 2:58:00 PM |
above |
|
52. |
4/25/2008 10:03:00 PM |
Priority - none. |
|
53. |
4/25/2008 10:28:00 PM |
OK as is |
|
54. |
4/27/2008 3:49:00 AM |
I've never heard anyone complain about privacy. Just cut the "overgrown" hedge back to the desired height. |
|
55. |
4/27/2008 9:17:00 PM |
Good as is |