1.

4/3/2008 3:25:00 PM

Calls for removal of more trees. This hole is already our hardest hole. Not worth the cost.

2.

4/3/2008 3:58:00 PM

seems like it makes the toughest hole tougher...

3.

4/3/2008 6:04:00 PM

for who--we only have few A players

4.

4/3/2008 7:47:00 PM

Remove bunkers on left and the hole will have a new uniqueness

5.

4/3/2008 9:25:00 PM

Don't use this tee but not opposed.

6.

4/3/2008 10:32:00 PM

see # 23

7.

4/4/2008 4:39:00 PM

hole long enough now

8.

4/6/2008 2:30:00 AM

Forward tees much more important for resident golfers

9.

4/6/2008 3:03:00 AM

Not two percent of the golfers get over the creek in two.

10.

4/6/2008 6:22:00 AM

Again, this is more change than anyone wants and it only would serve the 12 people here that consider themselves "Long Drivers". If those 12 people want to pay for this, fine, let them come up with the money.

11.

4/6/2008 6:10:00 PM

This is concern for long hitters only

12.

4/6/2008 10:58:00 PM

I use the red or black tees

13.

4/7/2008 7:18:00 PM

Therefore making #14 a par 5?

14.

4/8/2008 5:16:00 AM

Won't be used very often

15.

4/10/2008 4:27:00 AM

Don't know that it is really needed.

16.

4/15/2008 8:33:00 PM

This hole too long already

17.

4/15/2008 11:40:00 PM

not needed

18.

4/16/2008 4:28:00 PM

not necessary

19.

4/16/2008 8:33:00 PM

great for low handicap

20.

4/17/2008 1:22:00 AM

First remove the fairway bunkers as recomended.

21.

4/17/2008 10:30:00 PM

Again are we trying for an "Augusta?"

22.

4/20/2008 1:05:00 AM

Great idea for the low handicappers--make the course more challenging for them, less likely to make the green in two.

23.

4/21/2008 1:17:00 AM

Red tees are good

24.

4/21/2008 4:36:00 PM

wasted spending

25.

4/21/2008 7:25:00 PM

this is already a very difficult hole

26.

4/22/2008 6:48:00 PM

This hole is long enough and is absolutely beautiful as it is with many options for teeing.. Leave it alone.

27.

4/22/2008 10:28:00 PM

Not worth it.

28.

4/23/2008 3:11:00 AM

If done, it should be a par 5 from the blue tee box.

29.

4/23/2008 9:55:00 PM

Same as 23 comment

30.

4/23/2008 10:51:00 PM

This seems to me to be a difficult hole as it is. Not too many are able to land the green in 2 now. Do we really need to expand?

31.

4/23/2008 11:18:00 PM

No tree removal.

32.

4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM

tough enough just widen and redo tee

33.

4/25/2008 2:46:00 PM

not justify the cost

34.

4/25/2008 2:57:00 PM

see above

35.

4/25/2008 6:42:00 PM

it would be a realistic par 4 for very few players - only if it became a par 5

36.

4/25/2008 8:54:00 PM

hole is already long enough

37.

4/25/2008 10:01:00 PM

Width yes/length no!

38.

4/25/2008 10:26:00 PM

majority of golfers lay up on 14, do we add just for the long knockers?

39.

4/27/2008 3:49:00 AM

See comment above