|
Question #24 - For Tee #9, "Removal of the railroad tie wall and combining of the current back and forward tees into one large teeing space at the same level to increase teeing area on this par 3." |
||
|
# |
Response Date |
Comment: |
|
1. |
4/3/2008 3:25:00 PM |
This tee is an eye sore in its current state of non maintenance. |
|
2. |
4/3/2008 7:47:00 PM |
Not necessary |
|
3. |
4/3/2008 8:08:00 PM |
Whats wrong with the wall? |
|
4. |
4/3/2008 9:25:00 PM |
Great idea - short but mentally difficult hole. |
|
5. |
4/5/2008 1:21:00 AM |
Plant a plant that will overhang the ties and hide them. |
|
6. |
4/6/2008 3:03:00 AM |
Great, let's do it NOW! |
|
7. |
4/6/2008 6:22:00 AM |
This is just dumb. The back tee can be combined with the middle tee with out removing the railroad tie wall. If they want to replace the was with something more stable, fine, but the elevation of the tee should not be changed. |
|
8. |
4/6/2008 6:10:00 PM |
It's fine the way it is |
|
9. |
4/6/2008 10:58:00 PM |
The railroad tie wall at least gives me somewhere to sit while waiting for the green to clear! Since I walk, this is important to me. |
|
10. |
4/11/2008 11:01:00 PM |
Not "in house" |
|
11. |
4/15/2008 11:40:00 PM |
why? |
|
12. |
4/16/2008 4:28:00 PM |
not necessary |
|
13. |
4/16/2008 5:17:00 PM |
when funds are available |
|
14. |
4/16/2008 8:33:00 PM |
waste of money |
|
15. |
4/16/2008 9:04:00 PM |
the wall is not a problem it is right at the cart path. Just grow some grass |
|
16. |
4/16/2008 9:18:00 PM |
plan available |
|
17. |
4/20/2008 1:05:00 AM |
I like the appeal from the current tee. |
|
18. |
4/21/2008 4:36:00 PM |
wasted spending |
|
19. |
4/21/2008 7:25:00 PM |
waste of money |
|
20. |
4/22/2008 6:48:00 PM |
Not Needed. |
|
21. |
4/22/2008 10:28:00 PM |
What's the cost versus value? |
|
22. |
4/23/2008 4:02:00 AM |
If it includes multiple tee markers. |
|
23. |
4/23/2008 9:55:00 PM |
Same as 23 comment |
|
24. |
4/23/2008 10:51:00 PM |
Also good for the health of the teeing area as this one is also often in disrepair due to being so small an area. |
|
25. |
4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM |
in house? |
|
26. |
4/25/2008 2:57:00 PM |
unnecessary expense |
|
27. |
4/25/2008 10:01:00 PM |
Needed. |
|
28. |
4/25/2008 10:26:00 PM |
would need new cart path - would have to remove trees |