1.

4/3/2008 3:25:00 PM

The current tee is problematic and we need a way to download play from it as we do on hole 13.

2.

4/3/2008 6:04:00 PM

This is not Disneyland

3.

4/3/2008 8:08:00 PM

Improve the condition, and keep the boxes the same size.Changing the tee location needs to be done more ofter.

4.

4/3/2008 9:25:00 PM

Option to reduce wear is important.

5.

4/3/2008 10:32:00 PM

Have never seen back tee used-

6.

4/4/2008 2:31:00 AM

Hole 4 is just fine as is!

7.

4/4/2008 4:39:00 PM

chute is too hard for all but the low handicap golfers

8.

4/5/2008 1:21:00 AM

Again lets just do what MUST be done.

9.

4/6/2008 12:24:00 PM

The new tee should be considered a Middle tee and could eliminate need to enlarge existing middle tee

10.

4/6/2008 3:03:00 AM

Do SOMETHING, the white teeing area is awful.

11.

4/6/2008 6:22:00 AM

There is insignificate play from any of the Blue tees to warrant adding another tee. Even if there were unlimited funds, this should be at the bottom of the list.

12.

4/6/2008 6:10:00 PM

I don't use the tees mentioned

13.

4/6/2008 10:58:00 PM

I use the red or black tees

14.

4/7/2008 12:39:00 AM

Add a tee in front of the pond for beginners.

15.

4/10/2008 8:34:00 PM

Make the back tee large enough to accomodate placement of blue and white as an option.

16.

4/11/2008 11:01:00 PM

Needs rebuilding by contractors

17.

4/15/2008 8:33:00 PM

Seems like an unnecessary expense

18.

4/15/2008 11:40:00 PM

very few use back tee and cost too hight

19.

4/16/2008 5:17:00 PM

later, not at this time

20.

4/16/2008 5:53:00 PM

How is it to be "expanded"?

21.

4/16/2008 8:33:00 PM

not for my dollars

22.

4/16/2008 9:18:00 PM

should not build tee over creek

23.

4/17/2008 9:53:00 PM

Too fee play to back (blue) tees. Another not needed on this hole

24.

4/19/2008 9:17:00 PM

Unclear

25.

4/19/2008 10:47:00 PM

Use ground beside the right side of lake.

26.

4/20/2008 12:38:00 AM

Doesn't adding a new back tee increase teeing options as well as reduce wear to the existing tee?

27.

4/20/2008 1:05:00 AM

Haven't played from the back tee enough to have an opinion

28.

4/21/2008 4:36:00 PM

wasted spending

29.

4/21/2008 11:18:00 PM

is the tee area more used than any other? Problem here may be the soil and shade

30.

4/21/2008 11:35:00 PM

If they need a chute-tell them to go to the rodeo

31.

4/21/2008 11:44:00 PM

trim some trees for back tee

32.

4/22/2008 6:48:00 PM

For recommendation #1, I already get that feeling by playing the back tees when I am so moved. Now that's a real challenge!

33.

4/22/2008 10:28:00 PM

Vewry few people who play regularly use the back tees.

34.

4/22/2008 10:58:00 PM

not necessary

35.

4/22/2008 11:08:00 PM

not necessary

36.

4/23/2008 4:02:00 AM

Expansion of tees seem to be course maintinance issues.

37.

4/23/2008 9:55:00 PM

We already reconstructed the tee and the quality is poor! Improve exisiting quality first and then as funds become available

38.

4/23/2008 10:51:00 PM

This teeing area is in need of enlarging as it is too small and often stressed.

39.

4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM

cut no trees, a good supt could make tee viable

40.

4/25/2008 2:46:00 PM

if new tee is about the same distance as the middle tee, this would provide rest for the current middle tee

41.

4/25/2008 2:57:00 PM

tee box doesn't get enough sun, size is sufficent

42.

4/25/2008 9:41:00 PM

construct the tee properly and don't cut steps using LWW volunteers - do it with professional contractors

43.

4/25/2008 10:01:00 PM

Necessary.

44.

4/25/2008 10:26:00 PM

add new tee RH side of cart path in front of pond

45.

4/27/2008 3:49:00 AM

See above comment