|
Question #21 - For Hole #1, expand "... the two back tees to increase teeing space and improve alignment to the landing area." |
||
|
# |
Response Date |
Comment: |
|
1. |
4/3/2008 3:25:00 PM |
Our tees were sized for approx 30,000 rounds when built. They need to be larger to accommodate current and projected levels of play. |
|
2. |
4/3/2008 9:25:00 PM |
I don't use these tees so I don't feel strongly. |
|
3. |
4/3/2008 10:32:00 PM |
You need a couple of short ones-who plays the course |
|
4. |
4/4/2008 2:31:00 AM |
Can't see the need. |
|
5. |
4/5/2008 1:21:00 AM |
They don't need it. |
|
6. |
4/6/2008 3:03:00 AM |
Expansion of these tees would help set off hole. |
|
7. |
4/6/2008 6:22:00 AM |
At the same time, replace all the turf with good grass. |
|
8. |
4/6/2008 6:10:00 PM |
I don't use those tees |
|
9. |
4/6/2008 10:58:00 PM |
I use the red or black tees. |
|
10. |
4/11/2008 11:01:00 PM |
By golf course designers |
|
11. |
4/14/2008 12:15:00 AM |
worry about black tees instead |
|
12. |
4/15/2008 2:52:00 PM |
I don't see any reason to enlarge tees. They are perfectly adequate. |
|
13. |
4/15/2008 11:40:00 PM |
large enough now |
|
14. |
4/16/2008 5:17:00 PM |
Later, not at this time |
|
15. |
4/16/2008 8:33:00 PM |
low, low priority |
|
16. |
4/16/2008 9:18:00 PM |
3 holes #8, #14 & 15 are for making long holes longer |
|
17. |
4/17/2008 1:17:00 PM |
Seems fine the way it is now |
|
18. |
4/17/2008 10:30:00 PM |
Doesn't affect me and I don't know situation. |
|
19. |
4/19/2008 5:29:00 PM |
Depends on cost impact and downtime estimates |
|
20. |
4/20/2008 2:01:00 PM |
The architect needs to decide if he wants to add challenge to the course or make the course easier by "improving the alignment to the landing area." Many of the recommendations seem to be creating jobs without much thought to what the owners really care about. |
|
21. |
4/21/2008 1:17:00 AM |
Since I play from the red tees, this makes no difference |
|
22. |
4/21/2008 4:36:00 PM |
wasted spending |
|
23. |
4/21/2008 11:35:00 PM |
Leave them alone - look at the practice area. This was a complete waste of good money |
|
24. |
4/22/2008 6:48:00 PM |
Alignment to landing area might be nice but costs may be prohibitive for value received. |
|
25. |
4/22/2008 10:28:00 PM |
Cost is the issue. |
|
26. |
4/22/2008 10:58:00 PM |
all seem adequate for now |
|
27. |
4/22/2008 11:08:00 PM |
all seem adequate |
|
28. |
4/23/2008 9:55:00 PM |
Improve existing tees first |
|
29. |
4/23/2008 10:51:00 PM |
Good for the health of the teeing area to enlarge. |
|
30. |
4/25/2008 2:46:00 PM |
present location is what provides the challenge |
|
31. |
4/25/2008 2:57:00 PM |
same as above |
|
32. |
4/25/2008 10:01:00 PM |
"Probably" necessary. |
|
33. |
4/25/2008 10:26:00 PM |
this is short yardage par 4 - making it easier would require new handicap rating |
|
34. |
4/27/2008 3:49:00 AM |
How many golfers would use this area -- may be too much expense for too few golfers. Perhaps non-recreational golfers don't belong at LWW. I don't want my fees to up to accommodate a few golfers. |
|
35. |
4/27/2008 9:17:00 PM |
Good as it is |