1.

4/3/2008 3:17:00 PM

A very cheap way to improve the quality of our golf course. We waste the topsoil from aerification twice each year which is ideal material for mounding or filling bunkers.

2.

4/3/2008 3:52:00 PM

nice addition

3.

4/3/2008 4:40:00 PM

less lost balls is good

4.

4/3/2008 6:00:00 PM

Let the architect pay for them, then.

5.

4/3/2008 7:42:00 PM

Waste of funds. The course is beautiful who needs more visual definition

6.

4/3/2008 7:55:00 PM

Add mounds to deflect errant shots...only

7.

4/3/2008 9:22:00 PM

Anything that will "deflect errant shots..." is fantastic and the visual effects are also important.

8.

4/3/2008 10:29:00 PM

Why trick it up-the course is beautiful

9.

4/4/2008 2:31:00 AM

My good gosh, why?

10.

4/4/2008 2:44:00 PM

brings character to course and line of site for ball

11.

4/5/2008 1:18:00 AM

The Architect can pay for this.

12.

4/6/2008 3:02:00 AM

Shot definition is very important in golf. This would help.

13.

4/6/2008 6:06:00 AM

All these changes are un-necessary. Who needs "Visual Definition". We need good fairways without holes or missing grass. We need the quality of the "Ruff" controlled so it is consistant. We need the "Weeds Removed" from the fairways and Tee boxes. We need the grass on the Tee's to be maintained as good as the greens.

14.

4/7/2008 4:33:00 AM

this is an absolute waste of money

15.

4/11/2008 10:59:00 PM

By qualified contractors - no locals

16.

4/15/2008 2:48:00 PM

I will say again, improve the bunkers we have so that they are not so difficult to get out of!!

17.

4/15/2008 8:28:00 PM

OK as long as this does not destroy view from current homes

18.

4/16/2008 5:16:00 PM

the course is hard enough as it is

19.

4/16/2008 8:31:00 PM

NO NO NO NO

20.

4/16/2008 9:16:00 PM

do when cost effective

21.

4/17/2008 1:22:00 AM

Bushes would look nicer than mounds.

22.

4/17/2008 1:12:00 PM

If there is money in the budget after other changes

23.

4/18/2008 1:35:00 AM

trees and mounds on some would be nice

24.

4/19/2008 4:54:00 PM

Will our funds be well spent for this project?

25.

4/19/2008 5:24:00 PM

Depends on cost impact and downtime estimates

26.

4/20/2008 2:00:00 PM

The people who live on the golf course have paid premium prices for the openness of their property. Creating mounds to add visual definition to the holes is foolish and denotes that the golfers are not capable of seeing the hole as defined by the flags on the greens and by playing the same holes once or twice a week, knowing the lay of the land. OBSURD! If you want to deflect errant shots, maybe we should rename ourselves Wildwood Miniature Golf Park.

27.

4/21/2008 4:35:00 PM

wasted spending

28.

4/21/2008 11:17:00 PM

Agai n, is it worth the cost?

29.

4/21/2008 11:34:00 PM

Mounds cost money -w e don't need these

30.

4/22/2008 6:47:00 PM

Recommendations for mounding should be evaluated on a hole by hole basis. I see no need for any additional mounding.

31.

4/22/2008 10:23:00 PM

What would this cost? Other items are much more important.

32.

4/23/2008 4:30:00 AM

Would be nice not to see cars beside you when teeing off.

33.

4/23/2008 5:50:00 PM

If cost is reasonable

34.

4/23/2008 9:18:00 PM

Rather have trees on some holes

35.

4/23/2008 9:49:00 PM

Once course quality has been improved and is consistent, then consider funding

36.

4/23/2008 10:44:00 PM

This is one of those changes that will take very little $$$ and in-house labor should be sufficient to accomplish. This is also one of those "nice to do" items that can be coordinated with other dirt moving projects to approach in a logical manner.

37.

4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM

in house??? won't improve anything

38.

4/25/2008 2:44:00 PM

same as above

39.

4/25/2008 2:55:00 PM

unneccessary expense

40.

4/25/2008 9:59:00 PM

When funding is available.

41.

4/25/2008 10:20:00 PM

add a mound at lower end of driving range

42.

4/27/2008 9:43:00 PM

we do not need mounds