1.

4/3/2008 3:15:00 PM

Our bunkers have evolved into almost unplayable hazards for the average golfer. It is a simple fix and can be done in house.

2.

4/3/2008 3:52:00 PM

oerall plan makes sense to me

3.

4/3/2008 6:56:00 PM

re ?'s 17-19... lots of bucks for "this would be nice" chgs

4.

4/3/2008 7:41:00 PM

Maintain properly and not reconstruct

5.

4/3/2008 7:54:00 PM

Reconstruct but not remove

6.

4/3/2008 9:31:00 PM

reconstruct the ones that exist

7.

4/3/2008 10:28:00 PM

Only if needed-Frankly - don't think so

8.

4/4/2008 6:00:00 PM

GET RID OF THE HIGH LIPS!

9.

4/5/2008 1:17:00 AM

Lets make sure they all need it. I much rather reconstruct than build new ones.

10.

4/6/2008 12:19:00 PM

Most should be accomplished as greens are reconstructed

11.

4/6/2008 3:02:00 AM

Fix the bunkers we have now, most are terrible.

12.

4/6/2008 6:03:00 AM

If we spent the money to better maintain the bunkers we would improve the character of the course.

13.

4/6/2008 6:05:00 PM

Rid us of punishing design of our bunkers

14.

4/6/2008 11:46:00 PM

Low priority due to financing

15.

4/6/2008 10:53:00 PM

Please remove the horrendous lips.

16.

4/8/2008 5:12:00 AM

If reconstruction means getting rid of the steep faces lets do it if just means reshaping it seems like a lot to do over very little.

17.

4/10/2008 4:27:00 AM

Traps now are too steep on most holes

18.

4/11/2008 10:59:00 PM

By golf course architects

19.

4/13/2008 2:25:00 AM

if were building this course for the below 10 handicap you can put in more bunkers but if it si for the 20 and above maybe you had better redue or eliminate them all together. myself i like a few bunkers and i like a few with a small challange but i am also a 26 handicapper and may not change.

20.

4/16/2008 8:31:00 PM

not a priority!

21.

4/17/2008 1:22:00 AM

Most existing bunkers have ugly lips-will this be fixed?

22.

4/17/2008 10:22:00 PM

IF this mitigates the steep faces (e.g. 4, 13, etc.)

23.

4/18/2008 1:35:00 AM

some should be changed. All need better maintenance

24.

4/18/2008 4:30:00 PM

What is meant by re-construction?

25.

4/19/2008 5:23:00 PM

Depends on cost impact and downtime estimates

26.

4/20/2008 3:40:00 AM

Fix the current bunkers

27.

4/21/2008 4:34:00 PM

makes sense

28.

4/21/2008 11:07:00 PM

Many have already been reconstructed

29.

4/21/2008 11:28:00 PM

too costly for benefit

30.

4/21/2008 11:34:00 PM

Why?

31.

4/22/2008 6:47:00 PM

I do not favor adding, removing or rebuilding ANY bunkers,especially on a wholesale basis, unless it is done in conjunction with other work in the affected areas that is absolutely essential and funded from community reserves

32.

4/23/2008 4:29:00 AM

On all Holes

33.

4/23/2008 5:50:00 PM

Hole #15 could use change and or added bunkers

34.

4/23/2008 9:18:00 PM

Be selective

35.

4/23/2008 9:48:00 PM

Improve quality of exisiting bunkers first

36.

4/23/2008 10:42:00 PM

Reconstruction will improve these exisiting bunkers and I think most all of our bunkers are in need of some sort of attention. Again - need some priority and logic in the approach.

37.

4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM

same as above

38.

4/25/2008 2:44:00 PM

same as above

39.

4/25/2008 2:55:00 PM

reconstruct 13, 4, and 12

40.

4/25/2008 9:40:00 PM

same comment as #17

41.

4/25/2008 9:59:00 PM

Use in-house labor.

42.

4/25/2008 10:20:00 PM

is adding new sand and/or drain pipes called reconstruction?

43.

4/27/2008 3:49:00 AM

Need to prioritize and develop a timeline for reconstruction.

44.

4/27/2008 9:16:00 PM

Bigger & not as deep