1.

4/3/2008 3:15:00 PM

SAVES Maintenance Dollars!!

2.

4/3/2008 3:52:00 PM

overall plan makes sense to me

3.

4/3/2008 6:47:00 PM

some never or rarely come into play

4.

4/3/2008 7:41:00 PM

remove left bunkers on #14

5.

4/3/2008 7:54:00 PM

Dont think they need to be removed

6.

4/3/2008 9:31:00 PM

remove none

7.

4/3/2008 10:28:00 PM

Good show

8.

4/4/2008 2:31:00 AM

This is not in our best interest!

9.

4/4/2008 1:44:00 PM

If they are not in play remove them as the upkeep is costly

10.

4/5/2008 1:17:00 AM

Just reconstruct these to be more challenging.

11.

4/6/2008 2:25:00 AM

Bunker juggling is a money eater. Fix the course first

12.

4/6/2008 3:02:00 AM

remove some-leave others, don't be in any hurry!

13.

4/6/2008 6:03:00 AM

This is just more busy work. I'm beginning to believe the Master plan should be scrapped. We should concentrate on fixing what we have, not inventing something new, with no way to pay for it.

14.

4/6/2008 11:46:00 PM

Low priority due to financing

15.

4/6/2008 10:53:00 PM

It depends on which ones are going to be removed.

16.

4/10/2008 4:27:00 AM

Some traps never come in to play and should be removed

17.

4/10/2008 8:33:00 PM

Remove bunker on #11, Front pot bunker only on #12, fairway bunkers on #14.

18.

4/15/2008 8:27:00 PM

Seems unnecessary

19.

4/16/2008 4:26:00 PM

leave alone

20.

4/16/2008 4:49:00 PM

same as above

21.

4/16/2008 5:52:00 PM

Which ones and why?

22.

4/16/2008 8:31:00 PM

low priority for me

23.

4/16/2008 9:16:00 PM

evaluate hole by hole

24.

4/17/2008 1:22:00 AM

Removing back bunkers would save maintenance money.

25.

4/17/2008 10:22:00 PM

I like the idea of removing bunkers which penalize the long ball hitter (left on 14 and over the greens on 7, etc.)

26.

4/18/2008 4:30:00 PM

Why remove 25 bunkers and then build 17 new ones. Gross fiscal irresponsibility.

27.

4/19/2008 5:23:00 PM

Depends on cost impact and downtime estimates

28.

4/19/2008 8:51:00 PM

Reduce high lips on bunkers, cause of lots of verbal pollution

29.

4/20/2008 1:01:00 AM

Removal of the bunkers at the back of the greens is a good idea.

30.

4/20/2008 3:40:00 AM

Fix the current bunkers

31.

4/21/2008 4:34:00 PM

wasted spending

32.

4/21/2008 7:21:00 PM

Frivolous

33.

4/21/2008 11:28:00 PM

Just maintain

34.

4/21/2008 11:34:00 PM

I know all of the 25 bunkers-leave them where they are now

35.

4/22/2008 6:47:00 PM

I do not favor adding, removing or rebuilding ANY bunkers,especially on a wholesale basis, unless it is done in conjunction with other work in the affected areas that is absolutely essential and funded from community reserves

36.

4/23/2008 4:02:00 AM

This appears to me to be excessive. remore some okay.

37.

4/23/2008 5:50:00 PM

why?

38.

4/23/2008 9:48:00 PM

Improve quality of exisiting bunkers first

39.

4/23/2008 10:42:00 PM

Where to do so is "value added" first.

40.

4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM

too volumoius a ?

41.

4/25/2008 2:44:00 PM

not necessary

42.

4/25/2008 2:55:00 PM

same as above

43.

4/25/2008 9:40:00 PM

these bunkers are well placed & good. #4 only needs one bunker on the right side #14 the 2 on the left fairway should be removed

44.

4/25/2008 9:59:00 PM

Go to the "back of the bus."

45.

4/27/2008 3:49:00 AM

If not a significant cost - remove the ones that are not appropriate.