1.

4/3/2008 3:51:00 PM

not really a dramatic change...but agree it is a pretty boring hole

2.

4/3/2008 7:52:00 PM

Wouldn this require tree removal and cart path rearrangement?

3.

4/3/2008 10:27:00 PM

Excellent pin positions are available

4.

4/3/2008 11:12:00 PM

Good idea

5.

4/4/2008 2:31:00 AM

Don't need it!!!!!

6.

4/4/2008 1:43:00 PM

I like it. Leave it alone.

7.

4/4/2008 5:31:00 PM

Are you trying to make this hole for PGA play?

8.

4/5/2008 1:13:00 AM

Again, this already is an interesting hole...how many hole-in-ones have there been on 16??

9.

4/6/2008 12:18:00 AM

When green is replaced this should be done

10.

4/6/2008 2:56:00 AM

Good green, doesn't need expansion.

11.

4/6/2008 5:57:00 AM

This again is change for the sake of change. It would also probably eliminate the Oak tree. Again, who needs an "Interesting Pin Position"

12.

4/6/2008 6:03:00 PM

leave my favorite hole alone

13.

4/7/2008 12:33:00 AM

Don't mess with the par 3s. The course is difficult enough.

14.

4/8/2008 5:09:00 AM

Can we afford interesting?

15.

4/9/2008 7:36:00 PM

Wouldn't be high on my list.

16.

4/9/2008 9:48:00 PM

Not high on my priority list

17.

4/10/2008 8:31:00 PM

I think the trees would be a deterent for the placement.

18.

4/15/2008 11:22:00 PM

not worth the cost

19.

4/16/2008 4:25:00 PM

not necessary

20.

4/16/2008 8:30:00 PM

Not necessary for me

21.

4/17/2008 1:22:00 AM

Not high on the list of priorities.

22.

4/17/2008 10:12:00 PM

Why spend more $$ to make something "more" interesting.

23.

4/19/2008 5:21:00 PM

Depends on cost impact and downtime estimates

24.

4/19/2008 8:50:00 PM

Lots of expense for ???

25.

4/20/2008 1:00:00 AM

Since I'm a "fader," this would be fun and tempting

26.

4/21/2008 4:34:00 PM

wasted spending

27.

4/21/2008 7:19:00 PM

Difficult already

28.

4/21/2008 8:27:00 PM

fine as is

29.

4/21/2008 11:33:00 PM

there is nothing wrong with this green

30.

4/22/2008 6:44:00 PM

agree with the above "only replace greens when they have failed or are on the verge of failing" and when the operational costs of maintaining them in playable condition becomes too costly. Again, the cost of replacement must be from community reserves!

31.

4/22/2008 10:14:00 PM

Who cares

32.

4/23/2008 4:25:00 AM

Then it wiil be a par 4 for most people???

33.

4/23/2008 5:49:00 PM

Cost would be a determining factor

34.

4/23/2008 9:45:00 PM

Focus on what we can afford versus creative projects that are not needed. We have a very nice course. Spend the money on maintenance and keeping like it is for the invitational.

35.

4/23/2008 10:37:00 PM

Same comment as item #15

36.

4/25/2008 2:37:00 PM

change right bunker

37.

4/25/2008 2:43:00 PM

not necessary

38.

4/25/2008 2:54:00 PM

same as above

39.

4/25/2008 6:40:00 PM

vary the par 3 holes

40.

4/25/2008 9:58:00 PM

Not necessary for 3% of players.

41.

4/25/2008 10:18:00 PM

I have been a spotter during our Invitationals. 6-8 players hit the green - why make it harder?

42.

4/27/2008 3:49:00 AM

Same comment as #15

43.

4/27/2008 9:16:00 PM

OK as is

44.

4/27/2008 9:43:00 PM

please don't expand