| 1. | 4/3/2008 3:04:00 PM | Two people directed the Architect on how high and how large and location of proposed tees. Architect simply fed that information back to us. We have no need for tees as large or as elevated as planned. |
| 2. | 4/3/2008 3:47:00 PM | with the number of senior men and women at lww it makes a ton of sense to have proper forward tees |
| 3. | 4/3/2008 4:34:00 PM | just flatten the blacks - save money |
| 4. | 4/3/2008 6:43:00 PM | could be done simply with railroad ties , fill with dirt, level, and sod |
| 5. | 4/3/2008 7:32:00 PM | The current tee boxes are sufficient, not worth the expenses |
| 6. | 4/3/2008 7:46:00 PM | Put in forward tees, but dont think they have top be expensive...Whats wrong with the way they are now placed...Install black tee box on recommended holes.... |
| 7. | 4/3/2008 9:16:00 PM | Speed of play is always a concern and forward tees would help. Both 9-hole groups should agree to use forward tees all the time or they shouldn't be done! |
| 8. | 4/3/2008 9:31:00 PM | Why on hole 3? Doesn't seem necessary |
| 9. | 4/3/2008 10:22:00 PM | when you old-some people don't want to admit it. will help |
| 10. | 4/3/2008 11:08:00 PM | change colors on all Tees so the men aren't ridiculed for playing non white or blue tees |
| 11. | 4/4/2008 2:57:00 AM | Would like to use these forward tees on club play day to make play faster |
| 12. | 4/4/2008 1:37:00 PM | Half the golfers are 20 handicap and above and should be playing from forward tees! Change the colors so red is not identified with the womens tees etc. |
| 13. | 4/4/2008 4:30:00 PM | makes playable for more golfers |
| 14. | 4/4/2008 5:48:00 PM | Like forward tees but oppose spending big bucks - use existing fairway tees where practicle |
| 15. | 4/5/2008 1:05:00 AM | LWW has talked about doing the forward tees for yrs., it's about time. They don't have to be as large as the other tees. |
| 16. | 4/6/2008 2:51:00 AM | Another stalled project. Finish a project sometime soon. |
| 17. | 4/6/2008 4:56:00 AM | Define players tee selection by individual handicap! |
| 18. | 4/6/2008 5:48:00 AM | How does this address the black tees on all other holes. Is there sufficient room for them? |
| 19. | 4/6/2008 3:50:00 PM | Will speed up play and enjoyment for older players! |
| 20. | 4/6/2008 11:38:00 PM | Opposition is based on weather anyone will use the forward tees. |
| 21. | 4/6/2008 10:47:00 PM | We were promised proper elevated forward tees years ago and are still waiting! It is a lot more fun when you can reach most of the greens in regulation, which is not possible for me from the red tees (the par 3's, 1, 2 and 18 excepted). |
| 22. | 4/8/2008 3:35:00 AM | bit concerned if these will really be used once in place |
| 23. | 4/8/2008 5:53:00 PM | very valuable for our "more mature"members |
| 24. | 4/8/2008 6:22:00 PM | as long as they do not interfear with the flight of ball from the longer tee's |
| 25. | 4/9/2008 5:59:00 PM | We are all getting older. |
| 26. | 4/9/2008 7:30:00 PM | I can't imagine where a forward T would be on 3. |
| 27. | 4/9/2008 11:02:00 PM | We need them |
| 28. | 4/10/2008 8:23:00 PM | Also change red tee color |
| 29. | 4/11/2008 11:25:00 PM | Let association employees build. |
| 30. | 4/13/2008 1:47:00 AM | if this would encourage additional play by those persons htat would use these tees i recommend there instalation, but feel someone must gather this information first. |
| 31. | 4/13/2008 3:33:00 AM | We have a lot of older players who need a shorter course. |
| 32. | 4/13/2008 6:03:00 PM | Unfortunately - Players will probably NOT use them. |
| 33. | 4/14/2008 8:08:00 PM | too expensive for the amount of use |
| 34. | 4/15/2008 2:47:00 PM | Great idea. Many of the golfers are seniors, which makes forward tees most helpful. |
| 35. | 4/15/2008 8:22:00 PM | Not necessary on #3 and 4 |
| 36. | 4/15/2008 11:14:00 PM | none needed on hole 3 |
| 37. | 4/16/2008 5:15:00 PM | We were promised 2 forward tees in 1997 |
| 38. | 4/16/2008 5:51:00 PM | It's about time. Don't call them men's/ladies'. Just designate color by handicap. |
| 39. | 4/16/2008 6:02:00 PM | Golf for all levels |
| 40. | 4/16/2008 8:42:00 PM | why does #3 need two |
| 41. | 4/16/2008 9:00:00 PM | We do not need one on #3 |
| 42. | 4/16/2008 9:11:00 PM | must complete asap. need to persue a special assessment to complete |
| 43. | 4/17/2008 1:02:00 PM | Black tees ok on fairway, w/o elevated tees. Spend $'s elsewhere |
| 44. | 4/17/2008 9:35:00 PM | Black tees are rarely used here or on other courses. More forward tees are not needed. |
| 45. | 4/17/2008 9:58:00 PM | Assume 3 issue has to do with repositioning green on that hole otherwise why would we need adding forward tee? |
| 46. | 4/18/2008 4:25:00 PM | Since the black tees are rarely used, I see no reason to go to the considerable expense of constructing elevated tees. |
| 47. | 4/19/2008 7:27:00 PM | I feel that 4 is enough |
| 48. | 4/19/2008 8:46:00 PM | Not high on my priority list, especially if it is very costly |
| 49. | 4/20/2008 12:25:00 AM | Our aging population makes this desireable |
| 50. | 4/20/2008 12:41:00 AM | many black tees are positioned in or near the fairway and are adequate for their purpose. Spending $$ on elevated tees is a waste of money. |
| 51. | 4/20/2008 1:08:00 PM | Why go to the expense - give the player another stroke for par for those holes and then use honor system. |
| 52. | 4/20/2008 6:55:00 PM | 15 should have first consideration. |
| 53. | 4/21/2008 4:05:00 PM | mowed areas it think are good enough |
| 54. | 4/21/2008 4:32:00 PM | wasted spending |
| 55. | 4/21/2008 7:10:00 PM | Why hole 3? Don't waste money here, it is fine the way it is |
| 56. | 4/21/2008 11:16:00 PM | How much use do the black tees get? Is it worth the construction cost? |
| 57. | 4/21/2008 11:16:00 PM | Except #3 |
| 58. | 4/21/2008 11:33:00 PM | All the black tees should be put in |
| 59. | 4/21/2008 11:43:00 PM | #3 forward tee should be omitted, it is okay the way it is now |
| 60. | 4/22/2008 6:42:00 PM | Timing and costs would have a strong influence on my response to this question. |
| 61. | 4/22/2008 10:56:00 PM | confusion |
| 62. | 4/22/2008 11:05:00 PM | confusion |
| 63. | 4/23/2008 3:01:00 AM | I do not feel a forward tee is needed on hole 3. |
| 64. | 4/23/2008 3:04:00 AM | shorter tees for older golfers |
| 65. | 4/23/2008 4:02:00 AM | might speed up play and improve emjoyment for some |
| 66. | 4/23/2008 4:19:00 AM | Not needed, use existing tee blocks a save lots of $$$$ |
| 67. | 4/23/2008 4:19:00 AM | I think the black tees are fine where they are and the mounds are not needed |
| 68. | 4/23/2008 4:02:00 PM | if they would be used, I myself have never seen anyone using the ones we have |
| 69. | 4/23/2008 9:18:00 PM | O.K. in far future |
| 70. | 4/23/2008 9:33:00 PM | Since we have to fund all projects, money could be better spent on something that would have greater ROI |
| 71. | 4/23/2008 10:28:00 PM | Our course should offer an enjoyable round of golf to all levels of performance. A set of forward tees offers this option to those who do not hit the ball as far. With our aging population this is a logical step. Most other courses offer a set of forward tees. |
| 72. | 4/23/2008 11:15:00 PM | Absolutely a must. |
| 73. | 4/25/2008 1:56:00 PM | 3 should remain as is |
| 74. | 4/25/2008 2:36:00 PM | should be done in house--doubt supt. ability |
| 75. | 4/25/2008 2:42:00 PM | the limited use that these tees will get will not justify the cost. |
| 76. | 4/25/2008 2:52:00 PM | not used enough to justify costs |
| 77. | 4/25/2008 4:05:00 PM | Only 8 holes - 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, & 15. |
| 78. | 4/25/2008 9:57:00 PM | No need to lengthen tees. |
| 79. | 4/25/2008 10:10:00 PM | do the number of golfers using the forward tees justify the construction? |
| 80. | 4/27/2008 9:16:00 PM | Not necessary |