T e a c h i n g   T i m e
Objective: To teach and reinforce time recognition on analog and digital clocks
To employ as many aspects of Howard Gardner's MI theory in order to address each students' strong intelligence(s), as well as foster the weaker ones.
To practice counting and number recognition in the range from 0-60
Level: Elementary School
Materials Needed: Teaching Clock (digital/analog)
Pictures of various times of day/night
Print reinforcement for numbers, numerical and spelled out
Cuisenaire sticks
Students will already be keeping a class journal
 Activities: Show pictures of various times of day/night. Discuss/guess time of day from clues in the pictures. (Re)introduce hours. A day has 24 hours, each hour has 60 minutes. Talk about different types of clocks and show (or have them draw/point out) pictures. Discuss separate parts of the clock. Categorize into digital/analog. (visual, naturalist, mathematical)

Show the students the teaching clock. Count off the minutes while moving the minute hand, first alone, then with the students. Have the students clap their hands as each minute is counted off. Reinforce with the digital clock. Make reference to the print numbers on the wall. (I've seen young students who believed digital clocks had less minutes that analog clocks). (verbal, body, musical, visual)

Group students together and pass out Cuisenaire sticks in baggies. It's ok if some would rather work alone. Assign each group (or all groups) a specific time and have them show it using the Cuisenaire sticks. Ask them to explain it to you and the class when they're done. (body, interpersonal, intrapersonal, visual, mathematical)

Have students draw a picture of two clocks, one digital, one analog, showing a specific time in their journal along with 2-3 sentences of what they learned about clocks/time in class that day. (intrapersonal, visual, verbal, body, naturalist)



 
 
 
Evidently it's easier to cover some intelligence than others. Do you agree with the intelligences I've included for each activity?
What might be done differently to accommodate the intelligences that weren't addressed as much as others?
Is it necessary to consider every intelligence for every activity or lesson plan?
Is it necessary to include every intelligence for every activity or lesson plan?


back to main

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1