Reliability of our Bible texts.
(what man and time have done to  them)
------------------
ABOUT  THE NEW TESTAMENT GOSPELS
(Received from the Lord through
Jakob Lorber, on March 18, 1864)
______________
1)  The Lord:  "You ought to  know that the evangelist Matthew was accepted by Me when I met him as a  publican (tax-collector) on My journey to Kis, where he worked in the service  of Rome in a half-way station between Capernaum and Kiss.   Because of this  acceptance, people reproached Me, saying that I have dealings with publicans  and sinners.

  2)  "Since this Matthew was an excellent penman and did not want to  leave Me, he was accepted by Me as a scribe to relate only the facts, whilst My  John had to record the Word, that is, what I taught.   Sometimes Matthew  wrote down for himself more spiritual parts of My sermons and then asked John  to correct them;  Matthew had a good memory for physical things, but a  weak one for My spiritual teachings.

  3)  "As long as he traveled with Me, he knew only little of My family  relationships, and what he did know was told to him on occasion by James, Simon  and John;  yet he did not write it down on the spot, but only few years  after My resurrection;  when he was elected an apostle in Judas Iscariot's  place.   Having composed his gospel correctly, Matthew, the  apostle-evangelist, took it along on his journey to the south-easterly regions  of Asia.

  4) 
Thereafter, five different gospel-writers appeared, named  Matthew, in Jerusalem, Galilee, Samaria, Tyre and Sidon.   The one in  Sidon undisputedly was the most acceptable of the five.   At the great  church-council of Nicaea, the other four were declared apocryphical and  rejected, since they differed very much...even among each other.   The one  offside was considered as possibly genuine, though also this is, in part,  apocryphical in spite of the fact that the writer took all possible pains to  represent the report as accurately as possible.

  5)  "In reality he wrote
fourteen gospels, not just one,  always in accordance with what pretending eye-witnesses ad disclosed to him.    On the basis of these fourteen, he wrote a fifteenth, which, according tithe  judgment of many experts, was the truest and most important one.  This  pseudo-Matthew, whose real name was L'Rabbas, is the author of our present  gospel of Matthew.   The original genuine one can still be found in great  collection of books and manuscripts of every kind, in an important city of the  far north-eastern mountains of India, which is perhaps the largest and richest  on earth since the library of Alexandria burned down.  It consists of  several million books and manuscripts, which are unfortunately - not accessible  to anyone but the high priests, who are under the authority of the  uppermost  one of Brahma.   Only the Burmese have a genuine but  greatly shortened copy.

  6)  "You would also like to know what became of the Apostle Matthew  in those countries of India.   He had been supported there quite well, but  was not permitted to extend his teachings to others outside of the priesthood.    In his old age, guided by My Spirit, he found an opportunity to escape  into Burma, where he taught the Burmese all wisdom.   For them he wrote  the aforementioned, brief gospel.   In some of the better traditions,  Matthew is still called 'the Apostle of India.'

  7)  "From this information you can now easily understand the nature  of our biblical gospel of Matthew.   Likewise, you will better comprehend  what is said in the 13th chapter, where it reads in verses 55-56:  'Is not  this the son of the carpenter Joseph?   Is not his mother called Mary?    And are not his brothers James and Joses, Simon, Jude and John?    And are not all his sisters with us?   Where then did this man get all his  wisdom?'   To appreciate this correctly, one must know what is mentioned  in the gospel of John, namely, that I once came to Nazareth and taught  there  in the synagogue, working many signs.   Whenever my disciples  and apostles began to criticize Me, I said:  'No prophet is to rise from  Galilee', or in other words, a prophet is nowhere less appreciated than in his  father-land.   Then I left Nazareth, never to return.

  8)  "As regards My so-called 'brothers and sisters', they were  Joseph's children from his first marriage,
not the children of Mary, whose  only child I was.   The 'sisters' were not even daughters of Joseph’s, but  his poor relatives;  they were called thus because they lived  according  to the will of both Joseph and Mary.   Three of these  brothers traveled with Me, namely, James, Simon and John.   Two stayed  home to continue Joseph's business, and cared for Mary until I gave her over to  John's care.

  9)  You will find the same seeming contradictions in the Gospel of Luke.     This evangelist wrote also the Acts, 50 years after Me.   His  gospel is a compendium of what he found out through an eager investigation  about Me and the apostles.   He sent all his writings to Theophilus in  Athens, who then wrote a gospel from Luke's gospel, enriching it withal number  of additions, thereby injecting into it a number of incorrectness’s,  especially in a literal sense, out of which then grew all kinds of  contradictions, as for instance with reference to My highly tyrannical function  in the so-called 'last judgment', which is not at all in agreement with the  only still most correct, brief gospel of John; yet, spiritually it admits  an illumination, about which, together with other things, we shall learn in the  next Word.   Let this suffice for today.  Amen.
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1