4.0 Taking Early Retirement and focusing on Impossible Innovations

 

Life is full of surprises.  A particular event may look bad on the surface.  However it might be the stepping-stone to a huge success later on.  Conversely a particular event may look good and worth celebrating.  However it might lead to painful downfalls later on.  That indeed happened to Tseung.  The two strokes could have been viewed as disasters.  It impaired the thinking and speaking abilities of Tseung.  Everyone, including his son, thought that it was the end of the road for him.  The move to Tai Po was seen as a resting place before going on to the next life.  No one could have foreseen the medicine from Eunice Wong and the subsequent quick recovery.

 

Tseung had the time to focus back on the many impossible innovations.  The World benefits because of his two strokes and the forced early retirement.

 

Comments from the Editor and reviewers:   (a)  Most people think that a retiree in his sixties will be a burden to society.  Lee Cheung Kin was in his seventies when he called the sixty-year-old Tseung from the Hotel at 7:30 am.  One single innovation of Lead-Out-Energy changed the history of the entire human race.  The modern wealth generated exceeds all previous wealth in history.  Age should not be a barrier to innovation.   (b) What is considered an asset?  What is considered a liability to society?  Previously, over 90% of the population were farmers.  That percentage dropped when the agricultural technology improved.  Now, less than 2% of the USA population is farmers.  The number in China is dropping to less than 50%.  Are farmers an asset or a liability?  We can treat the retirees as consumer of goods and services.  The economy will be better with more consumers.  The percentage of farmers, factory workers and laborers will decrease with improvement in science and technology.  The Lead-Out-Energy machines and Flying Saucers will accelerate this pace.   (c) If you were an official in your country, do you think that there are ideas in the Blueprint article that may be applicable?

 

4.1  The failure and humiliation in Taiwan

 

The last Computer Consulting job Tseung took was the upgrading of the computer system for a hospital in Taiwan.  The hospital wanted to upgrade its computer system to provide better services for its doctors, nurses and patients.  The hospital wanted to market the new system to other hospitals and was willing to invest some money for a thorough evaluation.  A software company in Taiwan got the bid and invited Tseung and other consultants to participate.  The other consultants had a look at the magnitude of the task.  They said that the consulting fee was too low.  The job could not be done.  Tseung was in need of money.  He decided to take the project at the low consulting fee.

 

Tseung had no experience in hospital management systems.  He decided to conduct a full system analysis with the staff from the software house and the hospital staff.  He found much complaint on the existing system.  The system analysis phrase dragged on.  Tseung realized that he could not manage the project by himself.  The staff from the software house lost confidence in his leadership.  The hospital called in another software house with previous experience in hospital systems.

 

This software house raised many good questions that Tseung was not able to answer.  Tseung was publicly humiliated in the presence of the staff of the two software houses and the hospital staff.  Tseung was asked to pack his belongings and leave the project.

 

Tseung decided to take early retirement.  He did not try to find any more computer consulting jobs and started on innovative inventions.  This was a blessing in disguise.  He no longer had a boss to whom he had to report.  He no longer had a team to lead. He no longer had deadlines to meet.  His only tools were his own brain and a computer with an internet connection.

 

Comments from the Editor and reviewers:   (a) Tseung once said, “There is no such thing as failures.  They are just stepping stones to success”.   (b) Tseung had the extreme confidence enabling him to believe that he was God.  Either the problem cracks or he cracks.  If there is something that he does not know, he will know it tomorrow.  That Silicon Valley Mentality helped him to overcome all obstacles.  Should we promote such Silicon Valley Mentality in Hong Kong and China?   (c) Have you had any catastrophic failures in your life or your career yet?  Did you allow that to destroy you?  Did you become better because of it?  Is another catastrophic failure likely in your career?  Is it possible for your company to collapse?

 

4.2  Taking up the Kinetic Theory of Gases in Motion once more

 

Tseung spent his time in quiet Tai Po.  He had time to think.  He decided to complete the things he did not complete previously.  One of them was the Kinetic Theory of Gases in Motion.  Tseung decided to go back to the fundamentals.  If a solid is given a velocity, every molecule of the solid should acquire the same velocity component.  It does not matter whether the solid is pushed or pulled.

 

 

Tseung then reasoned that if a liquid or gas can deform and that the molecular distribution can change, then pushing a liquid would produce a different result to pulling that liquid.  As he was not a good experimenter, he went to see his friend, Mr. Peter Chan.  Mr. Chan further introduced him to two other friends, Mr. Ricky Tsoi and Mr. Henry Gu.  They did the experiment as described in

http://goldfield123.freehomepage.com/Lawrence3.htm.

 

Part of the abstract of the paper is reproduced as follows:

 

Abstract:  We examined fluid mechanics while applying the concept of velocity. Velocity in a fluid is different from that of a solid because velocity of a solid can be produced in only one way – giving the same velocity component to every molecule.  In a fluid, there are other ways – by changing the shape of the flowing pipe or controlling the inlet or outlet valves.  These other ways of changing the velocity have different properties and some may be attributed to changing the number of molecules moving in the X direction without adding the same velocity component to every molecule.  This phenomenon can affect the number of molecules moving or colliding in the Y and Z directions (thus changing the pressure in these directions).         Experimentally, we demonstrated that “push” and “pull” to produce the same velocity in water had different characteristics.  The concept of relative velocity in fluids must be examined again which will have important consequences for the design of water and wind tunnels.

 

Velocity in a Fluid

 

The concept of velocity in a fluid is more complex than that of a solid.  In a solid, there is only one way to produce additional velocity – giving the same velocity component to every molecule.  If part of a solid moves faster than another part, the solid will change shape or deform.  If we cannot observe any deformation of the solid, we can conclude that every molecule gets the same velocity component.  If we want to change the velocity, we have to apply force and change the velocity as required by Newton’s Laws of Motion.  We can push or pull the solid to provide this added velocity component.

 

In a fluid, there is at least another way to produce additional velocity – by changing the shape and/or the size of the flowing pipe.  There can be more molecules moving in the X direction with the same molecular velocity.  Note the phrase – same molecular velocity.  This means in a fluid, we do not need to give every molecule the same additional velocity component as in the case of a solid.  Fluids can deform as one of its natural properties.  If we can get more molecules to move in the X direction, we may be able to change the number of molecules moving or colliding in the Y and Z directions.  This molecular model can easily explain the Bernoulli’s effect – when a fluid moves in the X direction, the pressure it exerts on the Y and Z directions will decrease.  The Laws of Physics will still be obeyed.

 

One strong experimental evidence that velocity in a fluid is fundamentally different from that of a solid is the effect of “push” and “pull”.  In the experiment, Tseung and his colleagues compared:

 

l          The effect of adjusting the water outlet valve at the bottom to allow the water on top to “push” the water and

l          The effect of adjusting the water inlet valve at the top so that the water below tries to “pull” the water

 

The velocity of water could be determined accurately from the weight of the water collected at the bucket over a known time period.

 

Tseung and his colleagues found that:

 

1.       The actual pressure values needed to produce the same velocity were very different.

2.        When the liquid was pushed, the graph in Figure 4-2 sloped downwards.  When the liquid was pulled, the graph sloped upwards.

 

 

 Figure 4-2  The effect of Push and Pull on Pressure in the

        Y direction (P_y) versus Velocity of Water

 

It was always a puzzle to physicists – why should the pressure (force per unit area) in the directions perpendicular to motion change in fluids.  For a solid, if we give it a force in the X direction (horizontally), the force in the Y direction (its weight) cannot change.  The two forces can be combined using the parallelogram of forces but the Y directional force cannot change.  We need the new molecular model to solve this puzzle totally.

 

Tseung and his colleagues were delighted with the experimental result.  The experiment was simple but extremely conclusive.  Pushing and pulling water will produce different results and have different characteristics.

 

Mr. Tsoi had connections with the Chinese Military.  Through his efforts, Tseung and his colleagues got an invitation to visit the Aeronautical University in Beijing.

 

Comments from the Editor and reviewers:   (a) The simple but powerful experiment confirmed the Tseung Kinetic Theory of Gases developed some 35 years ago.  Innovation is not always continuous.  Could Tseung have conceived the push and pull experiment 35 years earlier?  The basic theory was proposed when Tseung was a young university student.  He could not come up with the experimental proof then.  He tried again as a MSc student.  He failed again.   (b) In innovative research, success does not always come from hard work.  One may be staring at the problem for years or decades.  The solution may not be found.  However, once the solution is found and explained, it becomes obvious.  The Leading Out of Gravitational energy is obvious after seeing the Lee-Tseung theory.  The explanation took some time.  The presentation in http://www.energyfromair.com/IOE_talk is now easy to follow and obvious.   (c) Can you understand that pushing or pulling a non-deformable solid will produce the same effect or characteristics?  Can you understand why the pushing and the pulling of a deformable fluid produce different effects and characteristics?  Can you explain it to your friends or post your explanation on the internet?

 

4.3  The Visit to the Beijing Aeronautical University

 

The Beijing Aeronautical University is one of the top Universities in China.  Many research projects are funded and performed there.  Tseung, Tsoi and Gu went there with their experimental set up.  The experimental set up was too bulky to put on a plane and the three travelled by train.  They had plenty of time to brainstorm. Tseung was the theoretician.  Tsoi was the engineer.  Gu was the presenter.

 

The first meeting was with the retired Founder of the University who could speak fluent English.  He and Tseung communicated in English.  His comment was that the new theory and the experimental results were revolutionary.  The university would evaluate them carefully.  The university would be very low key and Tseung and his colleagues should be patient.  A thorough examination of such magnitude would take years.  He designated a young professor who was in charge of the water tunnel to communicate with Tseung and his colleagues.

 

The young professor studied the theory and the experiments in great detail.  He suggested further experiments.  Unfortunately, such experiments could not be performed at the university laboratory because there were classified experiments being performed there.  Tseung and his colleagues used the shower room in their university lodgings to perform the additional experiments which had been suggested.  Tseung also talked about the aerodynamics of Flying Saucers.  The young professor said, “I can listen to you but I cannot comment as there are similar classified projects being performed at the university”.

 

After three days of meetings and experiments, the young professor reported to the retired university founder again.  He gave some of the equipment used by the university to Tseung and his colleagues and explained that their use would yield better results.  The primitive results from Tseung and his colleagues did indicate the correctness of the theory.  But better experimental results were needed to convince the scientific community.

 

Tseung and his colleagues left happily with the additional equipment.  Tseung knew that he was right all along.  He remembered that if he ignored personal fame and fortune, he could achieve miracles.  But he never thought that more and bigger miracles were to come.

 

Comments from the Editor and reviewers:   (a) We all have pushed and pulled solid objects.  How many of us ever thought of pushing and pulling liquids?  Some may even laugh at the thought of pushing and pulling liquids.  They may say, “Liquids deform.  They take the shape of the containers.  It is meaningless to think in terms of pushing or pulling.  It is a stupid question”.   (b) The Kinetic Theory of Gases in Motion initiated by Tseung 35 years ago indicated possible different characteristics.  The push and pull experiments could have been thought of 35 years ago.  The stupid question is not stupid at all.  It is the spark of inspiration.   (c) I think we should ask more stupid questions in our daily lives.  Many of them do not have a ready solution.  We should not blindly accept answers from the so-called authorities. Take time to think of a stupid question.  It may be a diamond waiting to be polished.

4.4  The experimental accident and the development of the Concept of “Energy from Still Air”

 

When Tseung and his colleagues went back to Hong Kong, they started to use the new equipment right away.  In one of the experiments, air unintentionally leaked into the system.  The measuring tube showed air bubbles.  Water and air bubbles came out from the measuring tube.  Most experimenters would have stopped the experiment; tightened the various joints and restarted the experiment.  Gu had the brilliant idea of allowing the continued leaking.  Half an hour later, the apparatus was still leaking.  Peter thought that they were mad and mopped the floor.  Gu and Tseung stared at each other.  Tseung said, “If we continued to allow water and air bubbles to return to the tank and repeat this leaking process, we might have produced the theoretically impossible ‘perpetual motion’ machine’.

 

They repeated the experiment but deliberately allowed the leaking.  Sure enough, the same result was produced.  Gu was delighted.  Tseung was puzzled.  How could a theoretically impossible thing appear in front of their eyes?  Peter then recalled that he had a friend mentioning a pump that did not require electricity to function.

 

Tseung et al decided to meet this friend, Mr. ‎Quan Bing Luan.   Quan was helping an inventor from Taiwan to find funding for a water pump invention.  That water pump was similar to a ram pump.  The running water caused a vibrating membrane to force water and air up to a height of over 15 meters.  Quan wrote a book titled “The Law of Conservation of Energy and the Perpetual Motion Machines”.  He used this pump as a proof that energy could be created from nothing.  He claimed that the Law of Conservation of Energy was wrong.  Tseung read the book cover to cover several times.  Tseung already worked out a theory that explained the leaking experiment and the water pump invention.

 

That theory is the Energy from Still Air theory.  Tseung was overjoyed and extremely confident.  He verified his theory with some cheap beach pumps.  He could pump water to a height of four floors or over 12 meters with the primitive set up.

 

Quan and Tseung met again.  Quan asked, “What do you think about my book?”  Tseung said, “Do you want me to give a polite reply or do you want a really honest reply?”  Quan said, “There is no point in a polite reply.  I want a really honest reply.  I want a top-notch scientific explanation”.  Tseung then said, “The only statement of value in the book was – the pumped water contained much oxygen and would be suitable for fish farming.  The rest was total rubbish.  There was no violation of the Law of Conservation of Energy.  The pump was just using energy from still air”.

 

Tseung then showed Quan his theory. (http://www.energyfromair.com)  The following information is taken from that website.

(Note: that website only displays properly when the visitor uses Microsoft’s Internet Explorer.) 

 

Previously, scientists did not consider the energy from still air.  Even if they knew that air flows into a system and then flows out from the system, they ignored the energy from such air.   They mistakenly thought that since air itself is not a fuel, it could not supply energy to the system. However, Air should be considered as an Energy Carrier. It could bring energy into a system and could bring energy out from the same system.  If the system were constructed so that 1.          The Air coming in brought in Energy E1, 2.          The Air leaving carries out Energy E2 3.          E1 could be greater than E2, 4.          We would have effectively harnessed Extracting Energy from Air.  The formula for calculating Energy of Air In is: Energy of Air In = Pressure of Air In x Volume of Air In Similarly, the formula for calculating Energy of Air Out is:   Energy of Air Out = Pressure of Air Out x Volume of Air Out.   The corrected form of Conservation of Energy for such a system should be: Energy In = Energy of Air In + Other Input Energy Energy Out = Energy of Air Out + Loss + Work   Previously, the scientific community ignored energy from air and used the incorrect form of Conservation of Energy in such systems with air flow, namely:   Other Input Energy = Loss + Work The correct formula should be:     Energy In = Energy Out   Energy of Air In + Other Input Energy = Energy of Air Out + Loss + Work   Other Input Energy + (Energy of Air In – Energy of Air Out) = Loss + Work   Other input energy is the externally supplied energy.  Once we realized that air itself provided energy and corrected this mistake, we could easily design systems that could Extract Energy from Still Air.  Many designs are possible.  Some have already been designed except that the inventors did not know the theory.  Some such machines were wrongly labelled as impossible perpetual motion machines.  Many workable machines were rejected by the scientific community and the many patent offices world-wide PROOF OF THE ENERGY FORMULA   The proof turns out to be extremely simple and should be within the knowledge and capability of the average secondary school student.   We can visualize a very long pipe that allows air to enter the system.  The air can push a weightless piston.  The force of air acting on this piston is: Force In = Pressure In x Area of Pipe   Let us assume in 1 second, this piston and the air move a displacement equal to the input velocity of air.  The work done or energy supplied by this input air is: Energy of air In = Force In x Displacement   If we substitute the Force In term, we get: Energy of air In = Pressure In x Area of Pipe x Displacement Energy or air In = Pressure In x Volume In   Similarly, we can prove that Energy of air out = Pressure Out x Volume Out   The difference between these two terms is non-trivial and must be taken into account in the energy consideration when we apply the First Law of Thermodynamics.  The main focus of this paper is to point out this omission in the past.  Textbooks and Engineers failed to take this energy into consideration.  Some experiments and some existing inventions will be used to confirm the above theory.   THE BASIC DESIGN STEPS   The basic design steps for the Energy From Still Air machine are: 1.          Use some other Energy to bring Air into the system. 2.          Compress such Air and use its Energy 3.          Allow such compressed Air to leave the system 4.          The compressed Air will expand and regain its energy from the atmosphere 5.          Repeat the above steps 1 to 4.  If properly constructed, the Energy generated from step 2 can be greater than the Energy used in step 1.    Massive use of this form of energy will cause GLOBAL COOLING.   Some scientists pointed out that if the Energy generated from step 2 could be greater than the Energy used in step 1, we could use the energy from step 2 to feed back the energy used in step 1.  Such a machine, after starting, could just use Energy from Still Air.  Is such a machine a perpetual motion machine?    The answer is that such a machine obeys the First Law of Thermodynamics.  The Energy Source is Air.  Thus it should not be classified as the impossible perpetual motion machine that violates the Law of Conservation of Energy.  The fault was that the inventors of such machines could not point out the exact source of energy.  Now, we could pinpoint such sources and thus correct the fault.  This will cause headache in many patent offices around the world.  They might have wrongly classified and disallowed many working inventions believing them as impossible perpetual motion machines!.   EXAMPLE 1 OF SUCH MACHINES The first example of such a machine was a water delivery system constructed in Tai Po, Hong Kong in May 2004.  Figure 4-3 and 4-4 illustrate the set up of such a machine.  Figure 4-3 illustrates the set up of a standard water pump (12) to pump water to great heights.  The pump needs to be powerful enough to overcome the back pressure of the water column.  Typically, to pump water to say, 34 floors, a water pump of 50 horse power or more needs to be used.    Figure 4-3   Standard technique of Pumping Water   Figure 4-4 illustrates the use of a 0.5 horsepower air pump (2) to pump water to 34 floors with the additional of 1-way valves (6, 7, 8)     Figure 4-4   Use of Air Pump and one-way valves   This experiment was successful.  Many engineers and laymen would like us to carry the experiment further.  They would like to see that the water coming back down from the great height could indeed power the air pump 2 and deliver more electrical power to drive other electrical appliances.   However, we just used the simple Conservation of Energy for the steady state of water flow as scientific verification.  The Energy coming from the pump and the potential energy of the lower water tank per second is:            Ein = Epump + fgh1 The Energy coming out to the tank at the great height at 9 is:            Eout = fgh2   In steady state, these two terms must be equal if there were no other energy entering the system. This means              Ein = Eout              Epump + fgh1 = fgh2     f = Epump  /g(h2-h1)   If the measured flow rate were higher than this predicted amount f, then the extra energy must be coming from somewhere.  This somewhere may be the non-obvious Energy from Still Air.   Preliminary experiments using a HK $300 air pump and less than HK $500 piping and one-way valves did show a measured flow rate which was higher than f.  However, we need more funds and equipment to do further verification.  We shall be glad to invite others to repeat the same experiment or perform other similar experiments.  We deliberately ignored the second stage that allowed water to flow back down to power a hydroelectric generator because we have discovered how to extract Energy from Gravity directly.    The extraction of Energy from Air can be thought of as an indirect way of extracting Energy from Gravity.  The existence of the Earth’s atmosphere is due to the gravitational field of the Earth.  If we can get the energy from Gravity directly, we should achieve higher efficiency. Such information is available in the other paper we are submitting to the same conference titled “Extracting Energy from Gravity”.   However, there is one advantage of the ‘Extracting Energy from Air’ machines.  It will cause GLOBAL COOLING that reverses the GLOBAL WARMING produced by the burning of fossil fuels.  This single advantage will encourage Governments and Environmental Groups to pour resources into the development of such machines.

 

Comments from the Editor and reviewers: (a) Who can claim to achieve Global Cooling with a simple beach pump and some one-way valves?  When I first heard it, I laughed.  I treated it as a joke.  But after I read the theory and did the actual experiment, my attitude changed totally.   (b) I asked my physics teacher – “Can the Global Warming problems of the world be reversed with such simple devices?”  He said: “When a compressed gas comes out as a jet from a nozzle, it will expand and cool the surrounding air.  This is a well-known physics phenomenon”.  He did not explain the phenomenon in the same way as Tseung.   (c) Tseung regards air as an energy carrier.  The energy carried in can be greater than the energy carried out.  The difference can be used to do work.  The air will then get its energy back from the local environment – cooling it down.  This is a simple explanation of how Global Cooling can be achieved.  We draw out energy from the surrounding air to do work.  (This may be in violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.  I shall leave the juicy argument to the Professors at top universities. Comment from a reviewer - This is bog-standard heat-pump Engineering and most definitely not in violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.)   (d) Tseung and his colleagues have shown that their Lead-Out-Energy devices do not violate the First Law of Thermodynamics.  Many academics regarded that as heresy at the beginning.  This apparent violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics may be another heresy that will turn to great truth!   (e) What do you think?  Should the entire science of Thermodynamics be re-examined?  Would you do it?  Or would you leave it to the experts?

 

4.5        Meeting of Lee Cheung Kin – “the number one genius of the World”

 

Tseung spent much time polishing the theory.  One day, he received a phone call.  The gentleman on the other end of the phone said, “My name is Lee Cheung Kin.  I am a good friend of Quan.  We have been working on the water pump invention for over 10 years.  I have one of these pumps in my factory.  I read your theory.  I would like to discuss the theory and the inventions in greater detail with you”.

 

Tseung was delighted to have someone sharing his point of view.  The many other engineers he talked to were somewhat doubtful.  They listened to the theory.  They saw the experiments.  However, they were still doubtful.  The most common question was – if the theory were true, the World Energy Crisis would be over.  The Global Warming problem would have been solved. – Can it be this easy?

 

Lee came to visit Tseung.  He recounted his entire life’s story.  He was one of the first groups of Chinese Engineers sent to the USSR for missile training.  He was given that opportunity because he ranked number two in the National Examination.  He could speak and write Russian but not English.  He was an Officer in the Chinese Air Force.  He did secret military research.  His downfall was due to his marrying a Chinese-Japanese wife.  He was suspected as a foreign spy in the Cultural Revolution.  He was stripped of his Officer ranking and he became a janitor for seven years.  After the end of the Cultural Revolution, he moved to Hong Kong and worked on cameras and photography.  He received some US investment and produced one of the most successful low-cost cameras.  He knew Quan in China.  Quan approached him more than ten years ago and introduced him to the water pump invention from Taiwan.  Several such water pumps were built.  One of them was in his factory in China.

 

He, Quan and a team of Chinese Engineers had been working on the pump but could not figure out the source of it’s energy.  He disagreed with Quan on the explanation of the source of energy.  He did not believe in the violation of the Law of Conservation of Energy.  When Quan showed him the Tseung theory of extracting energy from still air, he knew that it was the right answer.  He produced an engineering drawing of the invention from Taiwan.  The Tseung theory was a perfect fit.

 

Lee was over 70 years old but still kept contact with many in the Chinese Military.  He was very smart and received a very solid training in the USSR.

 

Comments from the Editor and reviewers:   (a) Science is science.  The training in the USSR and in the USA should be the same. The same experiments should yield the same results.  However, human emotions will come in.  In the internet forums, many participants focus on national pride.  There are many insulting posts that have absolutely no link with science.   (b) Lee has good connections to the Chinese Military.  That has both advantages and disadvantages.  The advantages include access to Chinese Government Departments such as the Chinese Patent Office, the Military College Alumni and many local officials.  The disadvantages include the sudden silence or withdrawal from discussions – with the excuse that the topic may be classified.   (c) What do you think?  Is the Chinese Government aware of what Tseung is doing?  Tseung assumed that there are classified projects related to Lead-Out-Energy being conducted in China.  Is that logical?

 

4.6  The waking up from the Hotel at 7:30 am by Lee Cheung Kin

 

Tseung was planning on holding a Press Conference on 20th December 2004 with the intention of announcing his Energy-From-Still-Air invention in Hong Kong.  One of the local restaurant owners in Tai Po, Mr. Cheung, previously worked as an engineer.  Using their own money, he and his friends built the demonstration system for Tseung.  They had a bet that if the system failed to work, then Tseung would pay for all expenses.  However, if the system worked, they would pay.  They were very happy to pay when they saw the working system which they had built with their own hands.  Tseung was well prepared and hoped to have his name entered into history on that important day.

 

In mid-December, Lee invited Tseung to visit him in his 3D Camera factory in China.  Tseung was impressed with the 3D photographs.  But the most impressive part was his many Government connections.  Lee then showed a video about a car that required no fuel.  That was the Dr. Liang video.  He also showed Tseung the marketing literature from Dr. Liang.  The theory behind his car was the Chinese Philosophy of Yin and Yang.  They both laughed and decided to seek alternative explanations.  They suspected that the energy might be from gravity, as the car would lose power going up a steep slope.  They watched the video many times.  Tseung took a copy of the Dr. Liang marketing material to his hotel. 

 

The next morning at 7:30 am, Tseung was woken up by a telephone call.  Initially he thought that it was a mistaken wake up call.  Then he heard the excited voice of Lee.  The voice said, “Rush over - I have cracked it; I know why the Dr. Liang car works!”  Tseung took a taxi and rushed over.  Lee showed a pendulum toy.  He used that toy to show the feature of one of his 3D photographs.  The swinging pendulum toy helped to produce the impression of a group of racing horses in motion.  Lee said that the pendulum toy used only one AA battery and could cause continuous motion for over six months.  He believed that the oscillation might be the key in extracting gravitation energy.

 

Tseung then remembered being knocked down by the heavy punch bag when he was twelve.  They brainstormed.  Lee was focusing on circular motion.  Tseung started the mathematical analysis of the pulled pendulum.  The rest is history.

 

The essence of the Lee-Tseung theory is:

 

When a sideways pull is applied to a simple pendulum, the Lead-Out gravitational energy is equal to the vertical component of the tension of the string multiplied by the vertical displacement.  So long as there is tension on the string, gravitational energy will be Led Out.      The ideal Lee-Tseung Pull is when the direction of pull is at right angles to the string supporting the bob.

 

There was an additional complication.  The Dr. Liang announcement and the demonstration of his working car were supposed to be on 26th December 2004 in the Holiday Inn in Zhuhai, China.  However, some investors filed lawsuits claiming that they had been cheated out of millions by Dr. Liang and his agents.  The Chinese authorities impounded the car and the promotional material.  There were doubts whether Dr. Liang would be allowed to make his presentation on 26th December.

 

Lee called Dr. Liang’s manager.  The manager was non-technical and could not follow the new Lee-Tseung theory.  He called a Professor Woo who had been approached by Dr. Liang.  Professor Woo was a retired scientist.  He was one of those responsible for developing the first Chinese Atomic Bomb.  Professor Woo came and within minutes, he shook the hands of Lee and Tseung.  He said, “Many top scientists including those from the Chinese Academy of Science have seen and sat in the car.  However, no one has been able to explain the source of it’s energy.  Your explanation is the best”.  Tseung then invited him and a Chinese Official, Mr. Au Yang, to come to Hong Kong for the Press Conference.

 

Comments from the Editor and reviewers:   (a) The story can be turned into a movie.  The story of Newton was the apple falling on his head.  That gave rise to the Newton’s Laws.  Modern Physics was born.  The story of Lee and Tseung was the pendulum toy.  That gave rise to the Lee-Tseung Lead-Out theory.  The World received infinite, non-polluting energy.   (b) Many thousands of scientists and individuals saw the Dr. Liang car or the video.  Many concluded that the car itself could not be a hoax.  (The same happened in the USA with the Joseph Newman demonstrations and videos.)  Why can’t they come up with a proper theory before Lee and Tseung?  Dr. Liang stared at the IC driven cylinder for years.  He knew that the power of that cylinder changed with the angle of tilt.  He should have guessed that the energy must be related to gravity.  When he could not explain it with physics, he used Yin and Yang.  That turned many potential supporters away.  Would we all commit similar mistakes – just find any explanation so that we do not look ignorant?   (c) When Lee showed Tseung the pendulum toy; Tseung remembered the experience of being knocked down by the punch bag.  The difference this time was that they did the mathematical calculations.  Once they finished the calculations, they knew that they could not be wrong.  They could explain the source of energy of the Liang Car using school-level physics.  That is the advantage of having a solid training in basic physics and mathematics.  Innovation is still rooted in physics and mathematics.   (d) Have you studied and understood the presentation slides at the beginning of the book and also in http://www.energyfromair.com/IOE_talk?  Can you present to others?  Is opportunity knocking at your door?

 

4.7  The first Press Release and the Dr. Liang Xingren Car

 

Lee and Tseung quickly modified their Press Release material to include extracting energy from gravity.  They were debating whether they should show the Dr. Liang video and help to announce the demonstration of a working car next week.  They got help from the chairman of the Hong Kong Invention Association.  The Press Release was held on the local restaurant in Tai Po.  The Energy-From-Air demonstration was ready.  Two forms were available.  One was to use a HK $8 beach pump to pump water to the fourth floor.  The other was to use a HK $300 air pump to pump water to the same height with a clear section showing the mixing of water and air.

 

The Chinese Official, Mr. Au Yang, gave the bad news in the last minute.  The Dr. Liang Demonstration on 26th December was cancelled.  The impounded car could not be released until after the court hearings.  The Press Conference could not mention or show the Dr. Liang Video.

 

Tseung gave the first part of the Press Conference on ‘Energy from Still Air’.  That was well received because there were working demonstrations.  Professor Woo and Lee were supposed to talk about energy from gravity.  They had to speak tongue in check which caused some confusion.

 

If there were no lawsuit issues, the Lee-Tseung Lead-Out theory combined with the working Dr. Liang Car in 2004 could have made big news.  Apparently, the Chinese authorities took the Dr. Liang car apart and doing that triggered a self-destruct mechanism.  The impounded demonstration car no longer worked.  Many agents who worked for Dr. Liang put the investors’ money into their own pockets.  Many were found guilty and imprisoned.  Dr. Liang and his invention were discredited.

 

Lee and Tseung were still very confident as their search of the internet, both inside and outside China, yielded many so called ‘perpetual motion’ machine inventions whose operation could be explained by their theory.

 

Lee decided to pay personal visits to some of the inventors in China.

 

 

 

Comments from the Editor and reviewers:   (a) Many people asked Lee and Tseung for working models to prove their Lead-Out theory.  Tseung always replied “After we came up with the theory, we looked for working inventions on the internet.  We know that suitable pulse forces or Lee-Tseung pulls could Lead Out energy from oscillating, vibrating, rotating or flux-change systems.  To our delight, there are over 100 such devices in the China Patent Database and at least another 200 outside China.  We just need to read their information and apply our theory”.   (b) Are there any other inventions that are comparable – where the inventors do not have theories and so get rejected by the Patent Offices?  How should the Patent Offices react?  What would happen to the rejected patents?  Will they be revived?   (c) I believe that Lead-Out-Energy devices will replace all known electrical appliances in the near future.  Initially, there will be Lead-Out-Energy electricity generators providing non-polluting, inexhaustible energy to homes, offices and factories.  The 21st Century will be an exciting century with many new inventions.   (d) I now believe that many sightings of Flying Saucers are real.  Ordinary citizens have witnessed some of the top-secret research devices from the Military.  It is a matter of when the various Governments decide to release the top-secret research to benefit their citizens.  When one country makes the move, the others are bound to follow.

4. 8  The Birth of the Lee-Tseung theory

 

There was a meeting after the Press Conference.  The Chinese Official received a phone call from his superior telling him that he should not say anything.  He should not show support or discouragement.  He should remain absolutely neutral.  Professor Woo planned to visit his children in USA and planned to talk to the professors at Harvard and MIT universities.

 

Lee would start visiting the selected Lead-Out-Energy inventors.  Tseung would focus on polishing the theory and communicating with the Patent attorney and the Patent Examiners.

 

Professor Woo came back from USA and told Tseung about his meetings with the Professors at Harvard and MIT.  He said the initial reaction of the Harvard Professors was that Tseung and his colleagues made a mistake in double accounting.  Professor Woo used his own explanation of infinite energy at resonance.  The Professors at MIT knew Tseung and reserved their judgment.  Professor Woo was convinced himself and started a pulse motor project with funding from the Military.  Everything from him would be screened before release.

 

Lee came back after visiting the inventor Mr. Song.  Mr. Song had a patent on a magnetic motor.  The first generation motor was bulky and could generate 400 watts.  Song mistakenly thought that the energy from his machine came from the permanent magnets.  He could not answer the question why his machine could generate more energy than the energy used to create the magnets.  Lee and Song discussed the possibility of a machine with no moving parts and relied on magnetic flux changes only.

 

Meanwhile, Tseung already expanded the theory to cover oscillation, vibration, rotation and flux changes.  The abstract of the original PCT patent application (PCT/IB2005/000138) was:

 

The invention extracts energy from gravity, based on the corrected theory of the pendulum. When the pendulum is pushed, it will 'Lead Out' gravitational energy at the same time. If a source of pulse force (F) is applied to the pendulum at resonance, it will keep on 'Leading Out' gravitational energy. This gravitational energy can be extracted by techniques such as allowing the metallic wired pendulum to cut across lines of magnetic force and generate electricity. The swinging motion of the pendulum will be slowed down because the mechanical energy is converted to electrical energy. However, such slowing down is speeded up via pulse force (F). The swinging motion can be changed into a constant rotational motion for a more efficient operation.

 

They decided to file a Chinese patent to specifically include flux-change devices.  See the China Patent Data Base for details.

200510054958.X

通过振动获取能量的方法及系统

 

Tseung then searched the internet for documented inventions that might use Lead-Out energy.  He found over 100 in China and over 200 outside China.  Some of the better-known ones are described in:

http://altenergy.site90.com/

http://www.overunity.com

 

Comments from the Editor and reviewers:   (a) Professor Woo from China went to Harvard and MIT in 2005.  Professor Woo did not speak English.  He must have used interpreters.  It is always difficult to find good interpreters on technical topics.  Tseung once told me that story of a Chinese Professor in China using the language translating software on his English papers.  The conclusion was – nothing made sense.   (b) At one time, Tseung used his poor Chinese to write the information.  The reaction from the reviewers was violent.  They said: “If you do not provide any Chinese, we would find a good translator to do the work.  If there were doubts, we would come back to you for clarification.  You cannot go wrong.  However, if you provide a Chinese version yourself, we would trust your document.  Please never write anything in Chinese to us again”.   (c) I can type and write reasonably good Chinese.  That is why I became Tseung’s helper.  When I first took on the task, I did not realize its impact on the World.  Opportunity knocked and I answered the door.  Can I build a Company more successful than Microsoft?  It is a dream at the moment.  But I firmly believe that dreams can come true with the appropriate dedication, support and effort.   (d) Can you understand the Lee-Tseung lead out theory now?  Can you appreciate that it is a diamond mine?  Can you pick up the unpolished diamonds and make them shine?