Question 5. The jedi act to preserve life. Sometimes it is necessary to kill. Under certain circumstance a Jedi is permitted to kill another being. However, the Jedi must never forgot that killing is inherently wrong. The death is a stain upon the Jedi's spirit. Sometimes killing or fighting is the only answer available. Sometimes it is even the best answer, but that doesn't mean the Jedi shouldn't seek an alternative. Which action would not be grounds according to Jedi philosophy and law to kill another being?
A Jedi allows evil to take place by inaction, allowing the Dark Side a small victory. You forsee him becoming a Dark Side agent of evil. You decides to kill him before he has a chance to do anymore evil
Killing in self-defense or the defense of others especially the weak and the good.
Killing, if by the action they preserves the existance of life.
Sentencing a rogue Jedi to death for the wanton destruction of innocents
Sentencing a rogue Jedi to death for turning to the Dark Side.
Sentencing a rogue Jedi to death for attempting to corrupt another Jedi.
