
The Jews rightly
understood their Scriptures to teach that Messiah would be of David's line, and
that under His sceptre the "throne of David" would be established with "justice and
judgment," the increase of His government and its attending peace
being endless (Isa. 9). But whilst they anticipated that Messiah should have dominion "to the ends of the
earth" (Ps. 72 : 8), and that He should be for a "light to the
Gentiles" (Isa. 42 : 6), there was, for all that, the vexing problem of His suffering and rejection at their
own hands (Isa. 53) to be accounted for. In fact, the apostle Peter
informs us that in Old Testament times the
precise relationship between the sufferings and the glory of Messiah's ministry was largely shrouded in mystery (1 Peter
1: 10-12).
It seems quite
clear from the New Testament that even the disciples, after being taught the
truth (Matt. 16: 21), were slow of heart to believe "all that the prophets had spoken" (Lk. 24: 13 : 35)
and were only gradually turned from the popular Pharisaical and
Rabbinical concept of a political, earthly kingdom. (See Lk. 17:20-21; Lk.
19:11; Jn. 6:15; Acts 1:6). For this
very reason the New Testament scriptures make a thorough, and sufficiently
clear presentation of the truth concerning Christ's kingdom and reign, as it
affects both Jew and Gentile, to provide a sound basis for scriptural teaching
concerning the "throne of David" and the government of his greater
Son.
By drawing
attention to a few relevant passages, it is hoped that readers will be encouraged
to seek the truth about these important matters from the Scriptures, and so
discover for themselves those principles which guided the Apostles, following
the example of their Lord and our's, in their use and interpretation of Moses and the Prophets.
THE SUPERIORITY OF NEW TESTAMENT REEVELATION
The former mode
of Divine revelation by the Prophets has given way to the word spoken in the
Son (Heb. 1 : 2). As we have already
seen, the predictions of the Prophets concerning Messiah were largely shrouded
in mystery; and yet Christ and His Apostles claimed that the events which are
recorded for us in the Gospels and the Acts were in agreement with what Moses
and the Prophets had predicted (Lk.
24:25-53; Acts 4:24; Acts 26:22;
Eph. 3:5; Rom. 1:2; 16:25,
26). Indeed, the New Testament' is concerned largely with recording how God
"fulfills" the "promise made unto the fathers" (Acts 13 :
32).
The predictions of the Prophets and the law of Moses (Heb. 7, 8, 9
and 10) are expounded by the apostolic preachers in terms of Christian
fulfilment (Acts 26: 22, 23), and this "understanding" of the
prophets is directly attributed to the enlightening ministry of the Holy Spirit
under the New Testament economy (Eph. 3 : 5; 1 Peter 1: 10-12; Jn. 14 : 26; 16
: 13).
The Prophets had spoken of Messiah as David's Son, and the New
Testament affirms that Jesus of Nazareth is the Messiah, the Son of David (Rom.
1: 2, 3; 2 Tim. 2:8). This, we believe, clearly indicates the manner and nature
of His predicted reign.
In His ministry, Christ drew a significant distinction between the
Divine economy which He called "the law and the prophets/' and that which
He called "the kingdom of God" (Matt. 11 : 7-14; Lk. 16 : 16). This
kingdom was "at hand" (Mk. 1 : 15); and men were urged to repent,
taught the need of regeneration in order to "see" and
"enter" (Jn. 3 : 3, 5), commanded to "seek first" (Mk. 12 :
34), and instructed in the necessity of becoming "as a little child"
in order to "receive" (Mk. 10 : 14), the kingdom of God. Moreover,
when asked about the "appearing" of the kingdom, our Lord stressed
that "the kingdom of God cometh not with outward show," neither was
it a case of "here," or "there," but rather "the
kingdom of God is within you" (Lk. 17 : 20, 21).
The New Testament is silent concerning any word from the lips of
Christ, or His Apostles, which provide a basis for a religio-political kingdom
concept. The whole evidence is in favour of a kingdom concept which is
spiritual (Jn. 3 : 3-5; 18 : 36), non-racial (Jn. 4 : 20-24), embracing men of
all nations (Lk. 13 : 29; Acts 10 : 45; 11: 18; 14 : 27; Rom. 15 : 9), of
righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Ghost (Rom. 14:17); and of Messianic
power and authority over "all nations," by which all men will be
brought to salvation and judgment (Matt. 25:31-46; 28:18-20).
The view taken of the nature of the Kingdom of God will be related
very closely to the view taken of the kingly authority and rule of Jesus
Christ. If the concept of the kingdom which we have outlined above is biblical,
then it follows that we should find a corresponding spiritual and heavenly
kingship attributed to our Lord.
That kingship
and governmental authority was predicted of Messiah is clear from such Old
Testament passages as Psalm 132 : 11; Isa. 16 : 5; Jer. 23 : 5-6; 33 : 15-18;
and such New Testament passages as Lk. 1 : 32; Matt. 22 : 41-46. It is
therefore not without significance that after His resurrection our Lord claimed
that "all power" had been given unto Him "in heaven and in
earth" (Matt. 28:18). Indeed, this is a remarkable word, and one which we
should ponder Well. The power referred to is "authority," the
authority to administer the affairs of His kingdom, and the power to extend its
borders into all nations. The same word is used to describe the
"power" of the Son of Man to forgive sins in Luke 5:24, and by Christ
to describe the "power" of the Roman governor in John 19:10, 11. A
similarly remarkable word is found in Christ's prayer of John 17, "As thou
hast given Him power over all flesh, that He should give eternal life to as
many as Thou hast given Him." The term "all flesh" refers to
"all nations of men," as in Gen. 9 : 11; Joel 2 : 28; Isa. 49 : 26;
and since the Scriptures predicted such authority over all men for their
blessing and salvation (Ps. 22 : 27-31; Isa. 49 : 6; Hosea 2 : 33, cf. Romans 9
: 25; Micah 4 : 1, 2; Mal. 1 : 11), the conclusion seems inescapable that
Christ is here laying direct claim to that power which the Prophets had
predicted of Messiah, and therefore asserting His possession of Messianic and
kingly authority.
On the day of Pentecost the apostle Peter
expounded the Old Testament scriptures regarding the "last days," and
the Messianic reign. He shows, first of all, that the outpouring of the Spirit
upon all flesh in the last days had been predicted by Joel (Joel 2 : 28-32),
and that in those days "whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord
shall be saved." This new era of blessing and salvation is the direct
result of the exaltation of Jesus of Nazareth, who, says Peter, "having
received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost,... hath shed forth this
which ye now see and hear" (Acts 2:33).
From verse 29-40 the apostle deals specifically with Messiah as David's
seed who was to occupy his throne. He reminds his hearers that God had sworn to
David that "of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would
raise up Christ to sit on his throne" (vs. 30). He argues that David had
anticipated Messiah's resurrection in light of the Divine oath (vs. 31), and
assures his audience that "this Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we are
all witnesses" (vs. 32). Peter goes on to show that the exaltation of the
resurrected Messiah to the right hand of God was taught in the Old Testament,
"The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, until I make thy
foes thy footstool" (vs. 34, 35). This word had been spoken by David of
Messiah, his seed according to the flesh (Ps. 110 :1). Hence, the seed which
God had promised to occupy the throne of David was to reign from heaven, and
from thence bring His enemies into subjection.
Is Peter not saying, therefore, that the Messianic reign and rule
has already begun? that in fact Christ, in fulfilment of the prophetic word, is
reigning from heaven and will bring His enemies to naught? Is this not why he
can assert, "Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God
hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ"
(Acts 2: 36)? Is this not Messianic lordship Peter is affirming?
The Lordship referred to is not, we believe, a reference to our
Saviour's deity, but rather an affirmation of His present kingly, Messianic
authority of which Peter had been preaching, and in the light of which he exhorted
his hearers to repentance, faith and baptism. (Is it not true that every
impenitent sinner is setting his face against the Lord's Christ in refusing to
yield allegiance to our messianic Lord?) We submit that Peter's Pentecostal
Sermon supports the view of a present reign of Christ, in fulfilment of the Old
Testament Scriptures.
The importance of a correct exposition of the quotation from the
110th Psalm verse 1 is evident from the frequency of the New Testament
references to it (Lk. 20 : 43; 1 Cor. 15 : 25; Heb. 1 : 13; 10 : 13; Eph. 1 :
20-22; Phill. 2 : 9-11; Col. 2:10; Heb. 1:4). We believe that every one of
these references confirms that the reign of Christ has already begun. The New
Testament knows nothing of any other "reign" of Christ. He is even
now "the Prince of the kings of the earth" (Rev. 1:5); the custodian
of the "key of David" (Rev. 3:7); "the blessed and only
Potentate, the King of kings and Lord of lords" (1 Tim. 1:15), who shall
reign "till He has put all enemies under His feet" (1 Cor. 15:25).
The
day will yet come when He "shall be revealed from heaven with His mighty
angels, in flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God and obey not
the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ" (2 Thess. 1: 7-8), and in which
"the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall
melt with fervent heat" (2 Peter 3 :10). God grant that we may be found of
Him in peace, without spot, and blameless.
Previous Article Winter 2005 Front Page