|
Louis D. Krauss |
|
Supporting The '9/11 Truth
Movement'
It is important for everyone to know the truth and for many reasons. Not least of which are those that have suffered in the years since that fateful day through the direct loss of loved ones; or the families whom have had loved ones perish in the subsequent and equally fraudulent �war on terrorism.� Regrettably, there are those that think it is an �American� thing and an �American� problem. But it is not. Britain is a case in point in which every citizen should be concerned. Not least because it was used as a pretext for illegal wars � both of which were launched without any justifiable evidence: The existence of WMD�s still does not exist and the U.S. and U.K. couldn�t prove then nor now that bin Laden was involved when asked to do so by the Taliban. You may not know, but bin Laden isn�t even wanted on his FBI �most wanted� poster for 9/11. FBI spokesman Rex Tomb has stated "The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden with the 9/11 attacks on America". But equally because it is the single biggest event that the Government has used to tear apart our civil liberties and build on-top of the already totalitarian democratic-dictatorship police state that we now live under. Gordon Browns Oct 25 2007 �Speech on Liberty� is now a horrendous joke: see Dominic Raab�s �Assault on Liberty�. And I thought it was the fanatic terrorists that hated our freedom and wanted to change our way of life!The evidence to support the belief that 9/11, at the very least was let happen, let alone that it was an inside job, is now staggeringly and overwhelmingly evident. Neither incompetence nor gross neglect stands up to scrutiny. If only the actual evidence is looked at, as opposed to mindlessly believing the state and controlled media � neither of which have really questioned the facts, but have done the complete opposite. As Prof. Dr. David Ray Griffin has pointed out, nearly everyone who looks at the evidence regarding 9/11 with an open mind ends up being convinced that it was an inside job. Wiki �Big lie�, the Government isn�t stupid. Only no-body loners in the �9/11 Truth Movement�? No, today it consist of professors, scholars, former senior military, intelligence service, law enforcement and government officials, fire-fighters, physicists, architects & engineers, medical professionals, lawyers, pilots, survivors, victims family members and celebrities. See patriotsquestion911.com If a real, independent investigation takes place there is simply no doubt of what the verdict will be because now the evidence that 9/11 was an inside job is as devastating as that fateful day itself. Doubts? If there is only one book that you read regarding the events of 9/11, then make it New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Expos�, and make it now. I implore and dare you to do so. This single book could provide the basis for the UN� International Court of Justice, or some specially constituted global body (independent of the U.S.) to investigate with highest priority, and publicly report its findings about, the charge that unknown elements within the U.S. Government, and possibly some individuals elsewhere closely allied to the US, caused or contributed to causing the events of September 11 to happen. �Truth Does Not Fear Investigation No Matter Who It Offends� Honour the fallen by the relentless pursuit of truth.
Louis D. Krauss -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
[1] - Opening paragraph of the Preface in �The Strange Death of David Kelly� by Norman Baker MP
Still think Ryan Mackey's so called 'white paper', that purports to examine David Ray Griffin's chapter on the NIST report on the Twin Towers and allegedly shows it to be 'completely off base' and others reviews of it to have their 'analysis [turned] inside out', to be reliable? See Chuck Thurston's 'My Response...', Kevin Ryan's 'The Short Reign of Ryan Mackey' and Jim Hoffman's 'Critique...'.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread302889/pg2
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread313448/pg1
Although, Im not sure how researching "Integrated Systems Health Management
for
aircraft and spacecraft" makes
you an expert on the physics of the WTC towers collapse.
by
Kevin Ryan, Steven Jones and others are risking their careers, credibility and livelihood for the sake of finding out the truth about these important matters. It takes courage to make a principled commitment to truth based upon one's own convictions -- particularly if your conclusions are going to be politically unpopular. These individuals should be honored and respected for what they are doing (regardless of their conclusions), not ridiculed and slandered with cheap shots the way Mr. Rothschild seems to enjoy so much.
Griffin doesn't put forward comprehensive theories of his own, let alone "peddle" any. His skills in philosophy qualify him to apply logical analysis to a comparison of what is known and documented about 9/11 versus what we've been told about 9/11. One doesn't have to look far before almost everything we've been told falls apart. He has also provided a service by compiling the numerous unanswered questions along with the conclusions of many other researchers. His efforts have provided a significant overview of this large and complex body of documented fact, government claims and ongoing speculation.
Laden denies responsabiliy: 16 September 2001 but praises.
On December 9, 2001 (Fake? now widely accepted as fake) U.S. military forces in Jalalabad found a video tape of bin Laden [1]. On December 13, 2001, the United States State Department released a video tape apparently showing Osama bin Laden speaking with Khaled al-Harbi and other associates, somewhere in Afghanistan, before the U.S. invasion had driven the Taliban regime from Kandahar. The State Department stated that the tape was captured by U.S. forces in Afghanistan during a raid on a house in Jalalabad.[2] The tape was aired with an accompanying [3] English translation. In this translation, Osama bin Laden displays knowledge of the timing of the actual attack a few days in advance [4]; the translation attributes the following lines to bin Laden:
On December 20, 2001, German TV channel "Das Erste" broadcast its analysis of the White House's translation of the videotape. On the program "Monitor", two independent translators and an expert on oriental studies found the White House's translation to be not only inaccurate, but also manipulative saying "At the most important places where it is held to prove the guilt of bin Laden, it is not identical with the Arabic" and that the words used that indicate foreknowledge can not be heard at all in the original Arabic. Prof. Gernot Rotter, professor of Islamic and Arabic Studies at the Asia-Africa Institute at the University of Hamburg said "The American translators who listened to the tapes and transcribed them apparently wrote a lot of things in that they wanted to hear but that cannot be heard on the tape no matter how many times you listen to it."[6] Arabist Dr. Abdel El M. Husseini stated: "This translation is very problematic. At the most important places where it is held to prove the guilt of bin Laden, it is not identical with the Arabic."[87]
December 27, 2001 - PRAISES
Laden claims responsability:
May 23, 2006 (5 minute audiotape)
Regardless, FBI do not have sufficient evidence to charge. Even when he claims responsability.
Found this and it needs answering:
PLEASE READ THIS. THE BIT ON THE FBI AT THE END IS VERY INTERESTING BUT ONLY
WHEN TAKEN IN CONTEXT WITH THE BELOW:
On September 16, 2001 bin Laden denied responsability but praised the attacks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_16
He says: �I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent
attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons.�
On December 9, 2001 video he claims responsability in this most controversial
video: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/osamatape.html
Regarding the controversial above tape, on December 20, 2001, German TV channel
"Das Erste" broadcast its analysis of the White House's translation of the
videotape. On the program "Monitor", two independent translators and an expert
on oriental studies found the White House's translation to be not only
inaccurate, but also manipulative saying "At the most important places where it
is held to prove the guilt of bin Laden, it is not identical with the Arabic"
and that the words used that indicate foreknowledge can not be heard at all in
the original Arabic. Prof. Gernot Rotter, professor of Islamic and Arabic
Studies at the Asia-Africa Institute at the University of Hamburg said "The
American translators who listened to the tapes and transcribed them apparently
wrote a lot of things in that they wanted to hear but that cannot be heard on
the tape no matter how many times you listen to it." Arabist Dr. Abdel El M.
Husseini stated: "This translation is very problematic. At the most important
places where it is held to prove the guilt of bin Laden, it is not identical
with the Arabic.": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videos_of_Osama_bin_Laden#December_13.2C_2001
On December 27, 2001 video he praises the attacks
October 29, 2004 video he claims responsability: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Osama_bin_Laden_video
(some see as fake: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/osamatape2.html)
He says: "I have already said that I am not involved in the September 11 attacks
in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had
no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women,
children and other human beings as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids
causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is
forbidden even in the course of battle.� The United States should try to trace
the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of
the US system but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some
other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of
conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation,
country, or ideology can survive. They may be anyone, from Russia to Israel and
from India to Serbia. In the US itself, there are dozens of well-organized and
well-equipped groups capable of causing large-scale destruction. Then you cannot
forget the American Jews, who have been annoyed with President Bush ever since
the Florida elections and who want to avenge him.� Then there are intelligence
agencies in the US, which require billions of dollars worth of funds from
Congress and the government every year.� They needed an enemy.� Is it not that
there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret
government must be asked who carried out the attacks."
On December 26, 2001, Bin Laden releases a tape that says the U.S.'s invasion of
Afghanistan is "a vicious campaign based on mere suspicion."
On May 23, 2006 audio tape he claims responsability: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videos_of_Osama_bin_Laden#May_23rd.2C_2006
On September 7, 2006 he claims responsability: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Osama_bin_Laden_video
Some see this as fake aswell.
On September 10, 2008, White House Press Secretary Dana Perino will be asked a
question. "But Osama bin Laden is the one that � you keep talking about his
lieutenants, and, yes, they are very important, but Osama bin Laden was the
mastermind of 9/11 �" Her response is to say that "No, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
was the mastermind of 9/11, and he�s sitting in jail right now." Interesting
page: http://www.911blogger.com/node/17949
THE INTERESTING PART:
Now, it is interesting to note that on most of these video tapes he claims
direct responabilty. He has admitted this under no duress or torture. On
10/4/2001, Tony Blair presented a paper that makes the case for Osama Bin
Laden's involvement before Parliament. It says, "this document does not purport
to provide a prosecutable case against Osama bin Laden in a court of law.�
Nevertheless, it continues, �on the basis of all the information available [Her
Majesty�s Government] is confident of its conclusions as expressed in this
document." On 6/6/2006, FBI spokesman Rex Tomb will say, "the reason why 9/11 is
not mentioned on Osama bin Laden�s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no
hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11." This according to Ed Haas of the
Muckraker Report.
NO HARD EVIDENCE? WHAT ABOUT ALL THE TAPES ABOVE? WITH ALL THIS THE FBI STILL
DOESN'T LIST 9/11 ON BIN LADEN'S MOST WANTED POSTER.
Additionally, this site says they're fake: http://911lies.org/fake_bin_laden.html
and this site says it's real: http://www.muckrakerreport.com/id372.html
This shows how easy it is to fake: http://hotair.com/archives/2007/09/12/video-fauxtography-made-even-easier/
I really do not know what to believe now.