From: lou archambault [email protected]

Subject: THE WAY FORWARD, 6528 words

Please provide whatever level of review and editing you are comfortable with. I will appreciate all input. I have quite away to go to get where I wish to be with the grammar and the tone of this piece. My intent is to provide food for thought, if I can accomplish that I am happy. You have the responsibility to accept or reject my notion of our purpose. Your opinion is vital to our understanding our role in life.

Thanks, Lou

The three essay subjects that follow comprise the body of this work:

+ The story category is new age. I hope one day to present this and other works to the public in wellness, social, and civic programs to expand the intent of what we do as the stewards of the lives we evolve.

+The target audience for this work is curious people of the world looking for different perspectives and perceptions describing the theme of life – from a universal monistic singular objective, which we all have in common. This story can be told in many ways to different audiences conveying the same message. The information within is provided at a building block level of elemental notions.

+ The reason this story is being told is to explore the understanding of our origin, purpose, and being. I wish to stimulate the understanding of our knowledge that has evolved through the ages. Bringing consensus to our words and ideas that convey a story to an audience for feedback and debate on our collective thought. Develop the feasibility of the premise that we, as humans, are the tools of our thoughts - perspective and perception of a common element origin with purpose that evolves all and is for all life.

+The purpose of this story is to weave understanding of the available evidence that leads to the conclusion that we hold the answers to the questions about our purpose. I have attempted to provide food for thought on the commonality of the purpose of our being human emotional animals, to demonstrate we have a long way to go to be what we perceive ourselves to be now - knowledgeable and progressive in advancing humanity.

THE WAY FORWARD, 6528 words

SOCIAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT -

Do we understand our purpose? -

Do you believe that, as a group, we the citizens of The United States have the best of everything and the most freedom in the world? Should we be satisfied with this status quo?  Is the United States citizen a proponent of greed? Does it appear evident that self-righteous bigotry and hypocrisy is a by-product of that greed? Is this greed the core stimulus for the apparent success of our society?  Greed has been demonstrated as a common element in developing nations of the past. Does our history show similarity to the group greed that fueled the development of the lost civilizations? Group greed fueled the fate of these lost societies of the world. These societies would not let their subjects explore and evolve a better understanding of self-control with a relationship to the nature of their lives. Survival was thought to be the end in itself. Control by intimidation was the method of social management. Do you believe this method has evolved? I mention a few of today’s groups such as: religious, racial, radical, ethnic, political, business, social, economic, fanatical, age, gender, illegitimate, news, advertisement, and governmental; they act as the agents for controlling the expressions of our minds and hearts. They express subtle forms of greed through the use of bigotry and hypocrisy. The apparent object of group affiliation seems to be the pursuit of control using the tools of intimidation, the mighty dollar or its representative influence of bought authority - everyone wanting to possess something. Some groups purport their interest as altruistic but the prime-motivator is apparent, the controlling currency /influence, the basic interest of their altruism - egotistical greed stemming from the desire to control the will of the other fellow.  We appear diluted with this greed; we seem to refuse to understand what it has done to past societies. It has ultimately brought the lost civilizations to their abrupt end. Their adversaries waited and watched their captor’s greed evolve into the arrogant confidence of a victor intent on their own destruction through self-indulgence in the spoils of that greed. They required more, always more, till the resources were strained and the masses revolted from the adverse stress to form yet another society based on yet another form of subtle greed. This appears to be the genesis of the subtle form of greed we experience today. Will we ever be able to control this greed at some point in time?

I tell this story, with the thought in mind, this world is a reflection of a greater ego than our human ego. Do you believe we are the product of a higher power or placed here by a superior more evolved life form? Why isn’t this entity represented in the will of man? All the effort expended to represent the will of society says its intent is not a unified intent of any one understanding. Oneness cannot evolve without acceptance and willingness to understand the purpose our benefactor had in mind - What is the purpose of society? Does it coincide with the purpose of our existence? What is the purpose of our being? Are we avoiding the intent of our purpose? We each feel and interpret the intent of each other by the emotions that are divulged in the process of trying to get what we want from others and the impact that want has on our lives. Why do we have to suffer for what the other guy wants? Emotions are unleashed when we confront these hurtles. We will use all our cunning to get what we want. When we mix this cunning and the egocentric nature of our will, with the group mentality of colliding ideas, it is convoluted and becomes a group conscience that does not reflect the individual conscience in the group. The group exploits our propensity for diluting our intent with the selfish purpose. Group goals cause alienation and prejudicial behavior between associate group interaction. All the giving and well-wishing that one can do means nothing if the intent is lost in a sea apathy with little intent at actually fulfilling the proposed goal if the actual goal is propagation of the group authority. Everyone says they’re here to help. Help who, themselves? Groups compete against other groups for the money, the manna that sustains and promotes their brand of right. When will man know he is his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome described in Genesis story?  This is when we will evolve beyond greed, to a higher stage of evolved existence here on earth.

The groups of our society have their capacity for using their pervasive hypocrisy and bigotry to further their brands of control in common. They say they are doing what is best for those they control - for their best purpose - ignoring the very intent of the being itself - Being understood to be the manifestation of the thought that created it. All groups use forms of dogma that require adherence to their prejudicial views so as to be right and fair in accordance to their brand of morals - they all purport moral fiber but will not tolerate dissent that will reform their antiquated perceptions of what civil behavior is. Religions use their dogmas to threaten those who deviate from their norm. Racial groups use their race as badges of defiance to compete for what they believe is owed them - using their idea of rights that center on their interest. Ethnic groups use their origin affiliations, as a political manipulative tool to promote their opinions - to control the flow of benefits and influence on behalf of their brand of right. Political groups have their platform lies and half-truths to facilitate their positioning and wrangling for control of the public will - exploiting their brand of right. Fanatical groups have their proclamations that unit them in their terrorist acts to force their brand of right. Government groups have their mandated directives, they hide behind to promote their pleasure - to tax the poor and create wars to keep their brand of economic bureaucracy afloat. Then there is the business group that has its bottom line in the forefront of its decision process - passing on all cost to the consumer while gouging as deeply as possible without bleeding the life out of the buyers' demand is its brand of self promoted rights. When will man be his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

All groups have their prejudices, hypocrisy, and bigotry in common. We (The group) function as beast of prey - pack hunters: To make money, have influence, and control people are the primary objectives, of the individual group member, as promoted by society's dictates - to get ahead and prosper at the cost of the other guy. For every gain there is a loss - This is the balancing mechanism theory used in the current economic equation of our society. I say, "We are responsible for balancing this equation without jeopardizing the welfare of the investor, the worker or the business ownership". I say, "The hypocrisy of our success lies herein, we do not balance the equation'. ' We are bigoted and hypocritical in accepting this responsibility of the oneness of our nature and our natural needs'. 'Strictly regulated regional worker owned and operated industry and business in a federated union of states could resolve the imbalance'. 'It could balance gains and losses so as to balance the forces of greed and stupidity that propagate rise and fall of investments." When will man be his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

All the prejudice, hypocrisy, and bigotry are protected by a legal system that will not differentiate between the cause and effect of the prejudice, hypocrisy, and bigotry that come before them because they are the source of it. The law only provides for a verdict based on the interpreted evidence of these conflicts between the parties of these groups when they are in contention - The legal system is the mechanism of the hypocrites and bigots - It is the thought process for all the prejudice, hypocrisy, and bigotry in the minds of the world's conscience. Like it is said, "It was the courts decision", as if the courts are not made up of people with the same propensity for error that occurs when any honest folk make a decision based on the understanding of the issue in deliberation. The courts, basically, provide the forum for rhetoric and for court procedures - the tools of deception, for all who know the truth but will not divulge it. When will man be his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

True justice is in the resolution of the cause and effect, of the ignorance, that spawned the problem; not in punishment, or in siding with an opinion, to promote acceptance of fairness of some prejudice, hypocrisy, or bigotry - like the actions that promote war, wealth, and winning that are not justifiable, because greed is evident in these acts and not justifiable without the use of some prejudice, hypocrisy, or bigotry to give reason for the desire to control the will of others for other than a selfless purpose - like to promote the well-being of all life. Only dealing with the root cause can the source of the reason, difference, and misunderstanding of the action be understood; then the true facts can be developed for understanding and modifying the behavior that is not civil. This will then prompt the improvement of the condition of our social environment - to share the world and ourselves, on all levels, as stewards of humanity. When will man be his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

Only bigots and hypocrites will attempt to make right the self-righteous notion that one man's killing is wrong, but man's wars are right - To kill is to kill is to kill and no statement of war changes that and no rationalization of taking a life can condone it. Punishment and retaliation for aggression are forms of revenge motivated by prejudice, hypocrisy, and bigotry. Resolving to circumvent killing and war is the way for agreement to tolerate the changes necessary to reach a world order that will realize the needs of all the inhabitants - that means of sharing the wealth, resources, and effort to promote a world without prejudice, hypocrisy, and bigotry. When will man be his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

The distribution of wealth holds the same prejudices of hypocrisy and bigotry - as if your effort is worth more than mine or mine yours. Money is the object of the bigotry and hypocrisy within the group's ego. It is their badge of power - wealth has no worth beyond the importance placed on it as a measure of claim. Ownership of natural resources is one of the biggest evidence of group prejudice, hypocrisy, and bigotry. Can the efforts of nature belong to man? The propagation of this myth that man should own, has evolved societies, using this greed; which is the greed that keeps the world community from organizing a central government for the betterment of the whole of humanity. Greed will not let it be. Greed is the root cause for all the prejudice, hypocrisy, and bigotry in the world. When will man be his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

The resources of the world belong to all the world inhabitants. The exploitation of these resources with the benefits and the subsequent impacts is the reward and subsequent responsibility of all the people of the world. There needs to be a reconciliation of the factors of benefit, profit, and restitution for the exploitation and use of the world resources. We need the resources of the world. These resources belong to nature as we also do. We are part of that nature. We work to extract the elements of nature and fabricate them to use them. All people should share in a portion of the wealth, in equitable proportion, in accordance with their right as being part of that nature, not their position or circumstance. The impacts resulting from the extraction of minerals. Distribution of the proceeds should be resolved before the associated greed affects the effect of our well being. We need to balance the distribution of the proceeds and provide accountability for all resources in accordance with each individual - as recipient of the benefits and responsibilities associated with the gains and impacts from the extraction, and use of all resources. We are each a part of the puzzle. All resources belong to all life. Not one person or life form is of less importance than the other - This will one day be understood. Man inherits his rights from his creator not his next of kin nor from who ever may endow the spoils of greed upon them. When will man become his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

The creator of this world has no need for religion. Religion is the fabrication of man. The diversity of religion is evidence of our prejudice, hypocrisy, and bigotry it has formulated the understanding of our fate. We wish not to understand, so therefore we do not understand the object or the purpose of our being and its significance. When will man know his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

I hear people say things like, "secular views water down morals". This sort of destine for secular interpretation of religious views indicates a lack of tolerance. Tolerance with respect to the actions and beliefs of others: Helen Keller is one who knew prejudice, hypocrisy, and bigotry. She has expressed that, "Toleration is the greatest gift of the mind". Tolerance is the official recognition of the rights of individuals and groups to hold dissenting opinions, especially on religion. I believe we lack a model of the ultimate perspective of the purpose of Being. To be, to exist in actuality; having life or reality. I think, therefore I am. I'm not speaking of faith or belief, I'm speaking of understanding. Understanding of the purpose of Being, not whether there is a Power that propels our world. I am speaking to the people that say, "My belief is right your belief is wrong", based on nothing other than what they have bought into and admittedly do not understand as part of the big picture in which their faith is held. I am not saying I understand every aspect of Being either. I attempt to weave an understanding of the emotional self in order to promote debate of the purpose of being. I ask again, "When will man be his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome"?

I think we need to come to grips with the fact: It is our responsibility to configure the purpose of our understanding of the past and the future to meet the needs of all the ideas that compose the fabric of our Being. We are a dynamic being evolving to a future state of being. We are one facet of the jewel of life. We have the purpose and responsibility of directing the energy of creation to a higher plain of existence. We have evolved through the ages to this point. Our progress has been motivated by primary events that caused shifts in the mind thought of the masses. We have come from the trees to the fields as apes. As apes we evolved to the man animal that preyed on flesh and sought physical survival. We grew to understand the capacity of thought and applied this abstract understanding to plan future actions to control the group. The individuals of the group sought identity in their thought and found the understanding of self. The self probed the thought to understand its origin and found that it was deducing thought of the root cause of existence by deducing all that is before it could be created. The thought came first, before the chicken or the egg; it was thought that the chicken would evolve from the snake that evolved from the slug that evolved from the source of its origin. We are the product of the creation of the elements of being that was thought into being in a logical fashion that is now being traced by the physical and biological laws of a science that is being thought of as you read this page. When will man understand he is his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

I feel I have thought through this model. I provide for a sharing in a commonality of constructive interpretation of this information. I have deduced this reasoning derived from historical and current information. I used pertinent sources having knowledge of word definition, scientific information and religious belief to formulate my opinion. When will man understand he is his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

The truth is in the understanding of the idea of God. A being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe. God is the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions. God is the force, effect, manifestation or aspect of this being. We thought this definition to satisfy the query of our source. We have constructed the terms of this definition. We are the creator of this term. We are the source – "not our physical being - our thought." Being is a function of our thought that is a function of the thought of the source. God is not an entity, something that exists as a particular and discrete unit. God as is Jesus is founded in our emotions. The emotions comprise the intense mental state that arises subjectively rather than through conscious effort and is often accompanied by physiological changes such as strong feeling such as joy, sorrow, reverence, fear, hate, love, or logic. God is founded in fear - the extreme reverence or awe as shown toward a supreme power. Jesus is founded in Love - a deep, tender, ineffable feeling of affection and solicitude toward a person, such as that arising from kinship, recognition of attractive qualities, or a sense of underlying oneness. The singular God and Jesus the man are the manifestations of the emotions of the fear and love in the mind of the Jewish nation - ergo they're named as the chosen people. They wrote the story about man being his brother's keeper - In Genesis it is said, God asked Cain where Able was and Cain said he was not his brother's keeper. As it turned out Cain killed Able, out of jealousy and greed - for what was bestowed on Able - and did not what to tell his God of his selfish deed. Able apparently did nothing to manage the emotions that drove Cain to commit the act, and so suffered the same fault as Cain. Able was a threat in the eyes of Cain because of the arrogance that pride and self-righteousness breed. When will man acknowledge he is his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

The usual perception of God is in the representation of the collective will in each religious rite, as they perceive their interrelationship to the unknown source of the power of being. All of the adjectives describing the types of beliefs reflect but lack cohesiveness and tolerance amongst religious beliefs implying separation of power of the source of creation, this is an unacceptable derivative because unity requires oneness; and the ability to resolve into one source the quality of the whole. The God of our thought encompasses all the civil and evil behavior of the world. The lack of any belief is in this God, because the thought to conceive the idea is of the thought of this God. Which are we? We are the thoughts of the God of being, which always was and always will be if we think it to be. You have to understand the knowledge that holds this wisdom of oneness. It is in every expression of purpose. We rely on the oneness to be when we say, "God". The term God expresses not only a deity but also the oneness of this deity. All beliefs refer to the God entity as if it is exclusive to their belief when in fact it is common to us all as an integral part of our emotional being. Even the atheist and agnostic profess God in the fact that they think. Thought being the power of God, without it they are not. To be or not to be is the question that we face in our purpose to propagate the image of creation in the mind of the universal, which is the summation of all the minds of all the forms of thought. When will man understand he and all life is the child creation of God and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

I believe that source, GOD, to be the same for all in terms thought. Thought applies to every aspect of existence. It is basic stuff. Thought is more basic than the elements of matter and light. It is energy at the inception of its conception. Thought is the Power of God. When will man understand his conscience and realize he is his brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

Which if any of these adjectives - used by various beliefs - when applied by it self is correct, in every sense, without exception in describing our Being and our purpose? Does any one bit of knowledge of the understanding of these terms provide the answer? "No it does not". These modifiers of belief do not. Religious, divine, holy, sacred, spiritual, sacramental, deistic, theistic, animistic, pantheistic, henotheistic, monotheistic, dualistic, Christian, Islamic, Moslem, Jewish, Judaistic, Mosaic, Baha'i, Zoroastrian, Avestan, Confucian, Taoistic, Buddhistic, Hinduistic, Vedic, Brahminical, Upanishadic, Vedantic, yogic, mystic, Sufic, devotional, devout, practicing, worshiping or any single term does not describe the whole story of being. To be, to exist as opposed to not existing. Understanding of the concept of Being is in the understanding of the blend of all faiths. The amalgam of these ideas does express the purpose of oneness and unity of our thought, energy, and power. Thought is the one common denominator in the equation of being. The diversity is the reason we are separated. It is the reason we must come together, to resolve our differences and form an evolved unity of our thought, and realize the super ego of the universal mind is the source of belief and truth. From the alpha to the omega is the journey of thought. The first to the last idea spawned from the desire of the mind. When will we be - work towards unifying the world to demonstrate we understand we are - our brother's keeper and end the Cain and Able syndrome?

WHY WE DISAGREE -

Do we know why we disagree? -

Once we understand we are each part of the whole of existence and that together we need to get back our voice to take on the task of doing what we are here for; then we can begin to forge a new agreement for the use of empowerment transfer. Empowerment transfer gives the authority for the use of ones will. It is key to understanding the mechanics of unifying our collective will in a common desire to discover our purpose as a species and the caretakers of our earth and our universe. Do we have the will to find the way forward in evolving our capacity to understand our purpose?

As a secular political society, we have historically imparted our will (authority) in the nomination of representatives. They represent us as groups. Typical over arching groups like the republican, democratic, and other political parties. The groups are broken into lesser or greater groups. Our affiliations with groups like religious, government, business, social, etc. take our very will (volition). Our will is left to the discretion of these groups for the most part. We don't feel it happening but in fact, it has happened. We are lumped into groups that use our will. We wish they would execute our will in fulfillment of our needs by manifesting change in our lives without our exerting our direct expression of will on each issue. We dare not act out on our own if our will is not represented correctly by the group. We have little power out side the group. The groups' wheel and deal their brands of benefits. Dissent leads to conflict within the group and thus disagreement and loss favor with the various proponents in control within the group. Challenging groups compete for support to promote their brand of difference at satisfying the groups various prejudices, hypocrisies, and bigotries - This is all done contrary to the expression that, "One should not throw out the baby with the wash water." Time and time again, as the saying goes, "A lot of the good stuff ends up on the cutting room floor," because of partisan greed. No one seeks consensus from the people as individuals. The individual has lost identity of their will because they fear the responsibility and repercussions of their individual abuses. The will has become a group expression not the representation of individual's views. Rational people can argue their own case given the chance, but we are not given that chance. We have a representative system - a stovepipe mentality system - where some one is thought to be the expert on the issues that impact your life - that says it has our welfare in mind when making the decisions that impact our lives. The group concept of representation has been shown faulty repeatedly. The citizens are not given the chance to seek agreement on their own ideas or a chance to convince others of the validity of their ideas in a one on one forum of representation that would educate the masses in decision-making - It would provide a forum for discussion and resolution of the prejudices, hypocrisies, and bigotries that flourish behind the closed doors of these groups. Do we have the will to seek the way forward to evolve our capacity to understand our purpose?

We feel incompetent and incomplete because those who are in control of the groups are manipulating our will. The belief in the idea that the group's will represents our will is fortified by our feeling incomplete as individuals due to our various prejudices, hypocrisies, and bigotries draining on our selfless will to be fair. The evident expression, "Let some else make the choice so I'm not responsible", is the underlying attitude. We feel whole and powerful when the sum of the parts is resolved to the collective energy of the group; like the idea of a one power (God) - as the Judaist concept. Misuse of the concept has occurred in splitting the understanding of a one power (God) from the understanding of human psychological and societal need. This purposeful concept has been relegated to religions with selective group beliefs. They have dissipated the utility of this tool of evolution. They have reserved God for themselves and their group - God is a concept that is integral to secular survival as well - It is a basic notion in understanding the self within us all. God is elemental to the equation of emotional stability and the resolution of prejudice, hypocrisy, and bigotry that is striking down our advancement to a higher plateau on the evolutionary scale. Do we have the will to go forward and evolve the capacity to understand our purpose?

The basic notion is that we must act as one purpose having different attitudes not act as different attitudes with different purposes if we expect to find our way to personal gratification and purpose. Alienation from the use of a common purpose objective in managing the stability of government, commerce, and other world affairs that require the basic understanding of purpose is the fault of the governing groups that want to hold the people from finding their collective strength in their collective will - Surely, you can sense the notion that purpose is the driving force of human nature -It is reasonable to conclude that the greatest purpose would be to seek our collective purpose. If we can agree to tolerate our differences and seek our common elements in discovery of our common purpose in the big picture, we will begin to know and understand that which made us be. This process is the route to the oneness of mind that is sought to resolve our grievances. This oneness will forgive us our sins (mistakes). This oneness will evolve the godhead -The essential and divine nature of God, regarded abstractly even if it does not exist yet. This oneness of will is the empowerment of the world to survive into the future and evolve to a greater state of Being. Without it we are doomed as the responsible reflection of any superior being. Our existence will not be needed in any future effort to evolve singularity that will occur with or without us as the leading component. All of existence is the manifestation of the desire of the sum of the parts of the will of being itself. Our thoughts are the elemental notions of being it-self. We are evolving the desires of thought (the essence of Being). Do we have the will to evolve the capacity to understand our purpose?

EQUALITY OF INDIVIDUALITY-

Do we know why we fear equality? -

Thought is the bond that we as life forms have to share as a decisive tool in our challenge to evolve our species to a higher plain of life and spirituality that reflexes the metaphysical - the being of existence that created our life form and set us out to discover our source. As humans our Hebrew brothers have provided us with a concept - source of knowledge on the theory of the beginning other societies have done like wise. The book of Genesis describes the evolution of a singular source and a theory of the beginning. Albert Einstein gave us a concept - the equation that describes the evolution of the energy of the beginning in, E=mc². Science has demonstrated the concept - biological connectivity of our genes to the genes of lower animals. The concept I present is, simply put - We have a single source of origin - Evolving from a lower group of our species and them from the evolution of the bifurcation of even lower species that spawned their beginning. You can then interject into Genesis that Adam and Eve were apes or monkeys that walked from a garden (a plush environment) to explore the plains, subsequently evolving into the human race. This would account for why they did not realize how good they had it. The sin mentioned in the bible would be the apparent mistake in choice. Their God was their conscience chastising them for their apparent mistake. The memory lingered in their minds and was told as lore to generations and subsequently written down. By this time, the form of this species had evolved. They changed in shape, size and in mental capacity. They evolved the capacity to communicate the abstract thoughts of their conscious remembrances and understanding. As all remembrance - as is to this day - they embellished it to portray the perceptual intent of the one relaying the recollection. Are we intelligent enough to carry on the legacy of the evolution of that creation?

This notion of our being as evolving entities from a source of energy provides a secular beginning derived from the logic and understanding of information from this day and time. It can provide the backdrop of our past and the logic to seek plans for growth and development of our species for some higher plateau of purpose rather than shear survival as separate isolated rival groups and individuals lost in the cloud of apathy governed by prejudices, hypocrisy, and bigotry. Are we intelligent enough to construct a legacy for the evolution of creation?

Can we digest the fact that as flesh and blood we are finite and that we need a common thread theory for the creation of a common understanding of Being and purpose of our thought? Our Thought is the essence of Being. Thought is our heritage. This model lets all the religions and non-believers of the world take part in the expression of a common superego, a self and its constituent elemental core -contents, ingredients, components, capacities, and parts. We are the products of our thought and individuality collectively. Our thought is the precursor to the reality of our existence as a Being. Our existence or non-existence is the objective of the subjective thought process of being. The purpose of being is the evolution of being itself. Our ego is the reflection of a subjective being creating a superego, the objective Being. Our role as egos is to expand the capacity of the self within us, especially as distinct from the world and other selves - this is the world of the metaphysical plain, where we are the tools of being. This is where we are building our God self (super ego), as in Freudian theory the division of the psyche that is formed through the internalization of moral standards of parents, society, and censors and restrains the ego. Super ego is mostly unconscious; it is composed of the ego ideal and the conscience. We are the thoughts of God as I see it. We are all of one source evolving into a more steady state. Impositions of ideologies reflecting the social needs and aspirations of an individual, a group, a class, or a culture only dilute the solution with parameters needing resolution. Our prejudices, hypocrisies, and bigotries must be resolved. Our focus must be on our development as the super ego of the species of mankind by resolving the bickering of group and self-egos into a common effort of growth and development of purpose and selfless love. It sounds impossible but so does the creation of life from nothing. Life is here we live it. We have egos and we can control them and mold them into a more useful component of our evolutionary equipment. The first aspect to control and mold is tolerance to challenge the old information that was compiled without consideration of the life purpose. Let all the information we live by pass the acid test of purpose and intent. Are we intelligent enough to carry on the legacy of our creation?

Tolerance in a common secular model is the key to begin the understanding the knowledge of existence - Our collective being is infinite. Our existence purpose limit is our utility in the evolution of our own being. A common understanding that bridge ideology is what needs to occur to overcome the separateness of the individuality of humanity. Without it we will destroy each of the other for the lack of it. What needs to occur is and understanding of our collective shared tolerance of self-being and its components (everything else) that composes the collective being. Then we can reckon the course that will balance the forces of the nature of this collective being and allow for the evolution of the creation of singularity of this essential being. Are we intelligent enough to carry on the legacy of the evolution of creation?

The primary purpose of being is to evolve the singularity of being - the process entails derivation of the limit and limiting the derivation to resolve singularity – the process of balancing the forces into one. Are we intelligent enough to have a legacy to pass on for evolving creation?

Out of the pure energy of thought, all of creation has its origin - We are each, good and bad, negative and positive, this is our nature it was defined by us. You cannot have one without the other with the definitions we devised. The balance of the emotion, will, and desire is the key to the progression of the evolution of God-self thought (superego). We exhibit our natures, our degree of civility and evil behavior, in our efforts at controlling our emotions that prompts our interest, desire, and intent. Our will is the component of energy we have to balance the objective of the emotional forces of civil and evil behavior. Power is the applied energy of the physical force. Our collective will has more power than our separate will. Our will is our way, the strength of desire. Our desires determine our direction. Our resolve (will) determines our outcome. We are what we think. Together we are whole and strong. Separate we are like the links of a chain divided. Desire is applied will in search of an objective. Objectives without purpose derive neither strength nor power that is beneficial or constructive in development of the physical self or the mind's id. The purpose to evolve is the objective of being. Balance of our thought nature is the goal. Are we intelligent enough to improve the legacy of our creation?

Religions are templates for coping strategies that have evolved over the years through the attempts of thinkers to involve others in the mechanics of existence. Some, out of fear, developed thoughts of the unknown and others, out of wonder, imagined our source. I think, "The evolution of a collective self-being is our heritage." Followers of most religious beliefs attempt the extraction of power from the unknown by defining rights of passage that will allow favor with the unknown (God). Religion like politics is a fabrication by man to control the power of the will of the individual for select objectives - Both are more interested with the propagation of the strength and power of the church and political group than the welfare of the whole of our being as the source of the power of existence. Religions purport the exaltation of God but never express the purpose of their God, as government never states its purpose for being with respect to anything other than to control the physical power of the will of man - no concern is given to mans' role in the process of life, death, and metaphysical existence. My theory proposes God is the source of the evolved thought of the mind, and the universe of which we all share as beings evolved from that collective thought origin. From the alpha to the omega is the expression of the evolution of the mind thought and the being of the source - the energy thought at the basic level that spawned all future thought manifestation of which we are part - the thought that evolved nature. Are we intelligent enough to champion the legacy of our creation - to evolve to be our brother's keeper?

My theory purports: We hold the force we seek. We have the way. The thoughts we think, our desires, are the fuel of our will, like the artist that perceives the painting, before it is manifested on the canvas by the hand of the creator. We must create our destiny or we will be replaced by a more apt component, like our ancestors the apes were replaced by us, or be destroyed like the dinosaur for not recognizing the need for change. We are the thoughts of creation - manifested as many beings of which we are of one singularity - all. Just as our own thoughts contradict our actions the thoughts of creation are a variegation of the potential of thought energy. The universe is a reflection of the super ego of the thought of creation - Can we manage it if we marshal our collective thought force? Our species has lost its drive to evolve its understanding of self. We need purpose to fulfill our will. We need each other to resolve the will of our actual singularity. Are we, as life forms, the most apt component to evolve the singularity of a diverse ego? If not our thought will create a form that can accomplish the task, as we have evolved and our ancestry has perished for lack of the requirements of survival for the goal of the source - singularity. Do we have the will to find the way forward in evolving our capacity to understand our purpose? Are we intelligent enough to know how to construct a legacy of love to base the evolution of creation?

Premise of this work is, all the information that I have witnessed points to a single source origin. Our emotions play a significant role in the discovery of self-desire and will of the source of life. It appears that the purpose of our actual self - our mind self (conscience) is to develop understanding of unified thought and its goal to balance the forces we exhibit through our emotions. We are part of the whole of creation, which is the thoughts that are held in the recesses of the universal mind - a mind, which is available to our thinking mind for the improvement of our collective conscience.

Do you feel your thoughts are part of a universal mind thought? - Let me know, It would help me understand the thoughts I have on this belief.

In closing I will say, "We are one energy in the form of many thoughts that were derived from the thought of the creator. Our purpose is to align these thoughts in a balanced equilibrium that satisfies the needs of all whom witness the words and the things thought." This is the objective of our being.