Matthew -- Sherri,  I did not mean for this message to go ahead and send
without the attachment; however, due to the size of the attachment my system
was unusable for what seemed hours.  However, in that I don't have a clue as
to how long it will take to upload the next two attachments, you should get
MS System Information Files on this system, including the upgraded System
File Checker.  In that, I will then do a new copy of the MS System
Information Files and compare notes against the July 5, 2000 print out.

Furthermore, as I have indicated to both of you, which next week Russel, the
manager of Office Depot, definitely wants me to bring the system in during a
time when Carlton the technician will be on th schedule.  Nonetheless, it
was not hard for me to find on the MS System Information Files the one entry
telling the end-user what type of Intel Co-processor was loaded in this
system, though reference to a math co-processor was indicated on two other
occasions.  Whereas, it is a Pentium Pro as opposed to your company's
attempt at even convincing the retail stores that it contains a 366 MMX
Processor which would at least operate at 233 MHz, but it doesn't.  That,
you should be able to read for yourself.

If you are unaware of what a Pentium Pro is considering you may not have
even graduated from high school when they were built, they are a 32-bit
microprocessor designed and manufactured by Intel and introduced in 1996,
that is specifically designed and optimized for executing 32-bit software.
For this reason, Pentium Pro systems are generaly equpped with Microsoft
Windows NT, which does not run 16-bit software.  Code-named p6 during its
development, the Pentium Pro (RISC) design philosophy including superscalar
architecture and pipelines.  Which actually would be just fine, if indeed my
system was designed to use it, but it wasn't, in that it is probably mildly
useful to speed up the LAN other than anything else.  Whereas, by my
operating a typing and word processing service, which I'm actually going to
prepare for, nonetheless only adding to your company's misery, in that I'm
in the process of receiving a large sum of federal money.  Money that will
allow me to buy a system that actual works, so that I can go on with my life
while my attorney handles lawsuits.  Furthermore, I will also contact the
other companies with whom have their names on applications in this system;
originally, I actually thought they would be more than happy to find out
what was going on.  So, now I am wondering if a class-action lawsuit will be
filed against every company who was involved in putting this system
together -- considering none of them seem to give a damn that a disabled
woman, trying to eek out a living, while at the same time homeless and
hungry (literally), mainly because I have used so much money in ink, paper,
and printer repairs just to make sure that before this piece of junk blows
up according to a concern about if I did a particular something or other, I
would 'Nuke' the system.

Because the truth of the matter is, I thought that all the problems with
this system were my fault, or even WIN98 being an enigma.  Only to slowly
work through the facts, basically as a fluke in that I couldn't afford to
call my 'Free Technical Support Service,' thus buying books, magazines,
receiving books free from the Computer Science Division at ECU, just to
figure it out.  Mainly, because as others are well aware I'm just happen to
be that intelligent and so without question (even discounting books for me),
my efforts were supported.  Mostly too, because they were shocked over the
fact that I wasn't working!!!

MATTHEW, AGAIN, ONLY BECAUSE THIS IS SO TYPICAL -- WHY DID YOU NOT TELL ME
HOW TO GET BACK TO THE DOS PROMPT FROM THE START UP GROUP?????

Attached, as I will try, because these are such files I may actually have to
divide them up, you should receive the old MS System Information Files and
the appended System File Checker that was done yesterday.  Like I said,
though, if it doesn't work I will have to break these files down into
smaller text files.  In the mean time, which I wish I could have got to this
sooner, only because my medical assist dog, who will be a year old this
Friday is sick and the fact that my 3-year-old grandson was here this
week-end I was able to locate and copy all the other files.  I didn't just
go to find for the Unattend.txt intentionally, because I glance through
files as I go and get shocked every day that time allows.  Whereas, I
literally have to finish dealing with you people in about a week, or
whenever the first term paper comes in or the federal check.



----- Original Message -----
From: <support@emachinesinc.com>
To: <REMOVED TO PROTECT THE RETARDED@earthlink.net>
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Case ID:1584526


> 11/19/00
> Jeanne Graves
> 2111 W. Arlington Blvd., 125
> Greenville, NC  27834
>
> Re: Email ID 1584526
>
> Dear Jeanne Graves:
>
> Thank you for choosing eMachines.  At eMachines, customer satisfaction is
> of the utmost importance to us.
>
> The .cpe file can be opened and edited using the microsoft fax cover
> editor. System.1st is a backup copy of the Registry from the first time
> Windows 95 was installed. If your Registry ever becomes corrupted, this
> file can be used to return the computer to an operational
> state.(http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/win95/tips/w9p9744.asp)
>
> Depending on when the extended warranty was purchaed we will be able to
> refund your $89. Please contact us at (801)401-1419 to have this setup.
>
> I would like to thank you for the opportunity to assist you.  Should you
> require further assistance with your
> eMachine, please feel free to send another message.  Your comments and
> suggestions are welcome. We love to hear from our customers!
>
> Again, thank you for choosing eMachines.
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Matthew
>
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Orignal Message xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Sheri,
>
> I spoke with the manager at Office Depot today as a matter of fact;
> whereas,
> once he knows what the schedule is next week, the company will be sending
> someone to pick up the system in order for all of us to get together
> whereas
> the facts regarding this machine can be logged and verified.
>
> What is beyond me at this point, is why that nobody has made any effort to
> return the $89.00 for technical support, which may be one of the first
> questions the judge asks.  I will be renting a printer this week-end in
> order to start printing and copying files, in order for all of all of the
> incredible, and 'polite' remarks I received while trying to get
> information
> from you, Matthew, and John.
>
> In the meantime, I'm attaching some text files to give you an idea, of
> just
> a few of the files that are on this sytem and give your staff an
> opportunity
> to print and read them.  Also, maybe you can tell me how to get back to
> the
> MSDOS prompt, only because I had intended on doing a print screen, but now
> I
> cannot even go to the C:\ prompt?  Trust me, when I tell you that I virus
> proof this system constantly, so you may want to be on the safe side and
> run
> a virus check too, just to be on the safe side.
>
> Also, in a reply I WANT SOMEONE TO TELL ME WHERE THE $89.00 IS AND WHY IT
> HAS NOT BEEN MAILED BACK TO ME!!!!  In actually, your company also is
> guilty
> of breaking a law called 'Truth in Advertising,' in that initially I
> signed
> up for a 3-year 'Free' Technical Support Warranty back in December 1999,
> or
> January 2000, 1999.  Though the electronic draft did not go through, I had
> a
> witness who I had pointed out the ad specifically to her.  In other words,
> the longer your company takes in reference to any issue, I would imagine
> the
> larger the judge's decision regarding punitive damages.
>
> Sincerely, Jeanne M. Graves
> ADDRESS REMOVED TO PROTECT THE SENILE
> SHE PROBABLY LIVES IN A RUBBER ROOM OR SOMETHING
> I DON'T KNOW MAN
>
> PS.  While going through the files I was planning to attach, I ran across
> a
> new one called Urgent.CPE.  How does a files with a CPE extension get
> opened????  As well, when I'm finished with this, I am going to attempt to
> execute every potential program just to see what will execute and what
> won't
> execute.  I would appreciate some reading the files very, very closely.
> Prior to my executing any files, however, I will have to do another System
> File Checker as this system eats files from lack of memory capabilities;
> but
> furthermore, I find it ironic that Microsoft only put a handful of files
> to
> be checked, considering the applications that come with the initial
> download.  Furthermore, after doing all of these things, I will go into
> System Resources and make a copy of that file, so that someone will have
> an
> opportunity to see what System Resources says.  Furthermore, and I don't
> understand why this was a problem, I requested a new copy of the system CD
> whereas when you find the SFCLog.txt, you will understand why.
> Unfortunately, because of every book in the world having no explanation as
> to why I could not get into windows at all last week, regardless of all
> things . . . I did a completely new format.  I had be told by a Computer
> Technician that was where anyone would truly find out whether the Hard
> Disk
> had any problems.  According to the format, whereas I can only assume,
> based
> on the command, that the system backed up to the beginning of the Seagate
> Tape Drive, it told me that I had 3,100+ MB in bad clusters.  Whereas,
> then
> all the system files started to load on the next set of good clusters.  As
> end-users, we never know these things do we?  I had recalled sending an
> email, after totalling my supposed hard drive bytes with used bytes and
> missing .4 of my supposed 3.2 GB, which of course not one technician
> responded as to where they were.  Thoguh I haven't actually done the math
> yet, what is the percentage of 3,100+ MB out of 3.2 GB.
>
> Well, for whatever reason, I couldn't find the classic UNATTEND.TXT. but
> was
> glad to find a .inf file for the Seagate Tape Drive that is installed in
> this system.  Considering I've got to go out and rent a printer, in that a
> technician suggested that your computer could very well have caused both
> of
> my printers to fry in just a scant two weeks of each other, I wouldn't
> doubt
> it.  However, until the Federal Government cuts loose some money, I need
> and
> want MY $89.00 and if it comes down to the money being wired, then wire
> it,
> because I'm sick and tired of the games and the excuses.  Once the manager
> at Office Depot is able to see what the technician sees and reads all the
> files I intend on printing, I imagine he is probably going to hit the
> roof,
> so I can only pray to God that Office Depot files their own separate
> lawsuit
> against your company for demeaning their company.  In other words, prior
> to
> my becoming a flood victim, my life was great.  Since then, I have
> received
> more than my share of 'Life Experiences,' in that taking your company to
> court or whatever it takes to get it through all of the thick skulls there
> is not even going to phase me anymore than it did my calling an attorney
> yesterday to inform him that I'm filing suit against him for legal
> negligence regarding a case he handled two years ago . . . in that I was
> surprised that he didn't see it coming.  However, I'm not surprised
> anymore,
> only because based on my pathetic disability income, it has become so
> clear
> and apparent to me that just like your company and so many others,
> discrimination is rampant -- so therefore, I guess nobody figured that
> anyone with my kind of intelligence, who chose not to waste my money on
> calling technical support, would ever figure out the fraud that your
> company
> has committed.
>
> So, Sherri, anything that you have put your name on regarding emails to me
> in reference to this system will be in the hands of the Justice
> Department,
> the Consumer Affairs Division, the U.S. Attorney General's Office, and the

> two eMachine addresses that I have.  Whereas, I should have never had to
> indicate in an email that I was not going to tolerate the obvious lack of
> respect that I was receiving from you, Matthew, and John.  However, what I
> don't understand is why an intelligent woman would be dragged down with
> the
> ship based on the fact that this company did indeed sell this system
> fraudulently, and even the 'Free' Technical Support for $59.00, which
> never
> existed as I later learned, because the 'Truth in Advertising Act' was
> amended to the Constitution approximately 30 years ago.  I'd say you could
> find yourself in a better position, as opposed to the games and other
> antics
> in response to any of my questions.  Because for one, they are never
> answered.  In that, in the future I will send my emails as attachments,
> whereas you people can actually see at least the questions, because I will
> start putting them in bold and underligning them if that is necessary.
>
> So, one question at a time for now?   How do you open a .CPE file????
> WHY IS GETTING MY $89.00 back to me so difficult for your company????
> THIS IS A NEW ONE, WHY DON'T THE SUPERVISORS GET ON THE BALL, AS OPPOSED
> TO
> PUTTING THIS BURDEN ON YOUR SHOULDERS????
> WHY DO YOU THINK GATEWAY IS SO SUCCESSFUL????
> ALSO, HOW DO YOU READ THE SYSTEM.1ST FILE????
> I DIDN'T MEAN TO ATTACH GENERAL TEXT, BUT IT WILL BE INTERESTING TO READ,
> I'M SURE AS ARE ALL THE OTHERS.  IF YOU DON'T PRINT THEM OUT, GENERALLY
> YOU
> END UP MISSING SOMETHING AT THE END WHERE WHOEVER DECIDED TO ENTER A NOTE
> ABOUT THIS, THAT OR THE OTHER THAT THEY JUST UP AND DECIDED TO DO.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <support@emachinesinc.com>
> To: <REMOVED TO PROTECT THE RETARDED@earthlink.net>
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 4:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Case ID:1580496
>
>
> > 11/17/00
> > Jeanne Graves
> > I LIVE IN A ZOO
> > NOBODY CLEANS MY CAGE
> >
> > Re: Email ID 1580496
> >
> > Dear Jeanne Graves:
> >
> > Thank you for choosing eMachines.  At eMachines, customer satisfaction
> is
> > of the utmost importance to us.
> >
> > Taking it to Office Depot would be a good idea. If you have any other
> > questions please send via email or call us at 801-401-1419 for
> assistance.
> > Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused.
> >
> > I would like to thank you for the opportunity to assist you.  Should you
> > require further assistance with your
> > eMachine, please feel free to send another message.  Your comments and
> > suggestions are welcome. We love to hear from our customers!
> >
> > Again, thank you for choosing eMachines.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Sheri
> >
> > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Orignal Message xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Dear Mathew,
> >
> > Hopefully, within the next week I will be able to either have Carlton,
> who
> > is a technician that works at Office Depot go through this system, if it
> > is
> > on Office Depot time.  Mainly, because the manager himself should have
> > given
> > me the opportunity to assess all of the problems within my 30 day
> warranty
> > with his company, considering I am a flood victim.  Whereas, from Sept.
> 9,
> > 1999 through September 15,1999, I only used my system as a medium in
> order
> > to scan 100s of pages of music, in that anything else regarding this
> > system
> > was not used.  On September 15, 1999 - September 18, 1999, I then
> > proceeded
> > to process all of those copies into the appropriate files.  On September
> > 18th, I was then rescued considering I had no phone, and/or electric
> > service
> > since September 15th.  However, due to fuel oil spills too, and the fact
> > that my Medical Assist Dog had to 'go out' occasionally I had to start
> > putting her health into consideration mainly because all of the water
> was
> > contaminated. She had no place to go, therefore, exposing her to the
> river
> > that had lain beneath our feet, basically, just a few feet from the
> > doorway;
> > but also, just a few inches from pooring over the sidewalk outside the
> > doorway.  I lived right on the river.
> >
> > After the 18th, according to the news and film, many of us were able to
> > actually see the dead livestock carcasses that lined the roads in areas
> > that
> > were not passable.  I have yet to drink the water here, due to the fact
> > that
> > there is so much chlorine in it -- chlorine actually speeds up
> > osteoarthritus, so based on my back injuries, why make matters worse any
> > sooner.
> >
> > It was then illegal for me to re-enter my apartment until October 6th,
> > 1999;
> > whereas, the property had to be deemed safe structurally, though it was
> > not
> > structurally safe enough for me to stay there.  Mainly because the river
> > not
> > only filled the crawlspace basement, which was probably 4 feet in
> height,
> > as
> > well as the underground laundry facilities, but my downstairs neighbor
> > including anyone who lived downstairs lost everything in their
> > river-filled
> > apartments.  The ceilings were about nine feet tall, so once my
> > downstair's
> > neighbor's ceiling collapsed, then the water began making its way
> through
> > the floorboards and into my carpet; which mainly cost me all of my
> > clothing,
> > because it was in a closet that did not receive fresh air causing most
> of
> > my
> > clothes to mildew.
> >
> > As far as my property, especially my computer, two printers, scanner,
> the
> > old Gateway 2000, television, VCR, Stereo, anything that you can imagine
> > actually, was placed at least 3 to 4 feet above the floor including any
> > appliance-related wiring.  Which at that time, as well, included a
> > brand-new
> > Electrolux.
> >
> > Therefore, as I mentioned in a letter ages ago to your company, I
> > technically did not begin any actual work behind this system until
> > November.
> > Yet, at that time, it behooved me why on that day why I had to re-load
> > WIN98
> > three times because it would inevitably crash just that quick.
> >
> > Well, I've managed to keep it up and running under the following
> > circumstances:
> >
> >     Such as the present, the only thing that is operating to my
> knowledge
> > is
> > the internet (modem), monitor, the Internet program, and my ability to
> > receive any sound if I desire.  Because, any more then that will kill
> it;
> > I've tried every step in the book to get programs to quit loading on
> > start-up, but that never stops.  So, besides having to start up System
> > File
> > Checker, which I discovered is a lot more effective when I enter my
> > additional extension files to be checked (I'll tell you why), I then
> > immediately close all other programs, go back to task manager and delete
> > any
> > icons that indicate that they will start upon set-up.  Yet, it doesn't
> > matter, they still start.
> >
> > As far as System File Checker is concerned, I finally figured out that
> it
> > only checks for system files, in that though the System CD also loads
> > program files, if I don't enter as many extensions in order for those
> > programs to be checked too, then they won't be checked -- thus, programs
> > and
> > peripherals will not start.
> >
> > Also, I have learned to use standby, because this system has not been
> > turned
> > off since Saturday.  Mainly because I know now, with fact, that if I do
> > have
> > to restart this system, that it has been working for so long, that it
> will
> > not start-up again if I were to shut it down.
> >
> > So, though your suggestion would seem logical to some people, I have
> > recognized as a flood victim that per any conversation I've had with
> > anyone
> > in this start regarding help as a flood victim, that I probably should
> > have
> > hired an attorney on September 20, 1999.  Mainly, because not a one has
> > followed through with anything they have said.
> >
> > I recognize that your company has every reason to protect its interests;
> > thus far, for whatever reason that this system was built and sold
> > fraudelently, gives me no reason to believe that your company would
> honor
> > anything that you have said.  In that, even right now, I don't
> understand
> > why, after repeated requests, I have not received my $89.00 for 'Free'
> > Technical Support.  Furthermore, according to employees at Office Depot
> as
> > well as a company called 'Computer Geeks,' the Office Depot boys make
> > every
> > effort not to sale an eMachine and the 'Computer Geeks' technician Andy
> > indicated that they have had more then their share of eMachines to work
> > on.
> > Therefore, what about all those people out there in the U.S. whose
> Mommies
> > and Daddies bought them a new system to take to college, but now have
> had
> > to
> > spend hundreds of dollars either getting it replaced, or having it
> worked
> > on
> > for hours.  In fact, the 'Computer Geek,' boys indicated that it could
> > very
> > well be the reason why my Hewlett Packard, that I had bought in August
> of
> > 1999 has to go in the shop as well now, or why the old HP has to go in
> the
> > shop too now.
> >
> > So, Matthew, if your company has reason to help me and also believe you
> > then
> > I'd like to see an act of good faith, such as the $89.00, which was
> > originally $59.00 --- that's a 'Truth in Advertising' law that your
> > company
> > broke.  Furthermore, unless I were to receive something in writing, with
> > someone's signature in ink on it, you might have a chance.
> >
> > But for right now, I will be better off, I'm sure renting a System and
> > Printer and discussing this matter with the Justice Department.  In
> that,
> > you failed to mention Punitive Damages, which in reality there is a law
> > that
> > indicates I can receive Punitive Damages due to the fact that not only
> > have
> > I not been able to get any work done, but also over the fact that my
> back
> > hurts like hell now, I suffer from horrible migraines, so thanks to your
> > company I spent hours doing nothing but working on this System because
> of
> > your company's decision to let this system out the door -- in that,
> maybe
> > it
> > is one of a kind, but apparently the Quality Control People certainly
> > didn't
> > do their job.
> >
> > As a matter of fact, I actually realized what has kept this thing up and
> > running, which is the tape drive that is installed.  It's the only thing
> > that makes senses.  A tape drive is certainly not indicated on the
> > schematics I received, or another e-mail that told me about all the
> other
> > things that supposedly reside under the cabinet.
> >
> > So, once again, in that I called customer service about my $89.00 and
> this
> > woman acted like she didn't know what I was talking about.
> >
> > The check can be made out to Jeanne M. Graves and mailed to the
> following
> > address:
> > Home-Towne Suites, Suite 125
> > 2111 W. Arlington Blvd
> > Greenville, NC  27834.
> >
> > Within the next seven days, I will have reports done by the Office Depot
> > technician as well as at 'Computer Geeks,' which will be mailed along
> with
> > copies of all the system files to the Department of Justice as well as
> The
> > Consumer Affairs Division.  Oh, I almost forgot, and all the copies of
> the
> > wonderful e-mails I have received via the Internet.  In that I have no
> > intention of complying with your suggestion at all, in that I have
> > practically begged your people to help me and as I indicated referring
> to
> > the unbelievable sarcasm from e-mails, many of which did not even answer
> > my
> > questions, why should I do your company any favors.
> >
> > As a matter of fact, I am also sending a letter to Microsoft, Intel, and
> > the
> > National Semi-Conductor Corp., which was temporary diverted.  In that,
> > your
> > company has shamed these other well-known companies with whom I don't
> > doubt
> > are going to be very upset over this issue.  Do you not suppose that the
> > Justice Department will be calling them in for their testimony as well?
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Jeanne M. Graves
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <support@emachinesinc.com>
> > To: <REMOVED TO PROTECT THE RETARDED@earthlink.net>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 10:35 AM
> > Subject: Re: Case ID:1566964
> >
> >
> > > 11/16/00
> > > Jeanne Graves
> > > WHATS A HOUSE? WHATS A PEN?
> > > WHERE DO I LIVE? ARE YOU MY GRANDSON?
> > >
> > > Re: Email ID 1566964
> > >
> > > Dear Jeanne Graves:
> > >
> > > Thank you for choosing eMachines.  At eMachines, customer satisfaction
> > is
> > > of the utmost importance to us.
> > >
> > > I apologize for all of the delays that you have encountered throught
> out
> > > this whole ordeal. If in fact all of the above mentioned is true that
> it
> > > needs to be resolved. Please contact us at (801)401-1419 to have the
> > > computer troublehsot and setup for replacemnt if necessary. They will
> be
> > > able to take the necessary action to get your situation resolved. You
> > will
> > > also be able to speak with a supervisor if necessary.
> > >
> > > I would like to thank you for the opportunity to assist you.  Should
> you
> > > require further assistance with your
> > > eMachine, please feel free to send another message.  Your comments and
> > > suggestions are welcome. We love to hear from our customers!
> > >
> > > Again, thank you for choosing eMachines.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Matthew
> > >
> > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Orignal Message xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Mathew, just to simplify things, because the entire message just got
> > wiped
> > > out.  The problem has become very clear.  The eMachine Company
> committed
> > > fraud in a big way and I have suffered incredibly, mainly because I
> have
> > > literally slaved over this system.  Only to find out this past
> week-end,
> > > while finally being able to gain access in order to read the BIOS
> > settings
> > > that this is nothing more than a 486DX that runs at only 66 MHz --
> > nothing
> > > more.  In fact, the system has sat here for two days because I stayed
> up
> > > all night Friday, getting absolutely no sleep until Saturday
> re-loading
> > > not only WIN98, but the supposed hard drive as well.  Though this
> system
> > > doesn''t even have one; in fact, it actually runs off of a tape.
> > >
> > > The files and even the schematics do not match up at all.  But this
> > > particular system, it was quite obvious that whoever the jerks were
> that
> > > put it together didn''t give a damn about whoever the end-user was
> going
> > > to be -- probably thinking what a great joke.  Maybe one day you will
> > get
> > > an opportunity to see all of the lines remarked out on the Sys.ini and
> > > Scandisk.ini files, or even the message that the setupapi.dll file was
> > > missing for Internet Explorer -- they didn''t indicate that anything
> was
> > > going to be done about it.
> > >
> > > There''s even a file called the Unattend.txt, where the jerks
> literally
> > > instruct the end-user on how a particular program should be set up,
> > > because they apparently walked away from the job.  Or the comment
> about,
> > > we better not leave this line in or . . . will nuke it!
> > >
> > > It''s not a joke.  I could have made approximately $15,000 by this
> time
> > > and gone on with my life as opposed to having to subject all the
> > > discrimination that I''ve received.
> > >
> > > What has occurred, is a matter that is normally handled by the Justice
> > > Department whereas I am going to personally assure you that the fine
> > > companies such as Intel, the National Semi-Conductor Corp., and
> > > Microsoft''s names are on this system and will be informed this
> > evening --
> > > unless, of course the system crashes again -- because I''m operating
> one
> > > program, the monitor, and the keyboard all at one time -- plus the
> VGA.
> > >
> > > What I want is my $89.00 back for the technical support that I could
> not
> > > afford; I want the full retail value of this piece of garbage in full,
> > > along with $10,000 in punitive damages which is included in the clause
> > > that I had read regarding interstate federal crimes regarding
> > merchandise
> > > such as this being advertised and sold fraudulently -- it''s an
> > > inter-state issue, in that the retailer is not held responsible at
> all.
> > I
> > > use to work straight from DOS on a homemade system that never gave me
> > any
> > > problems, other than I just wanted something faster and with color.
> > >
> > > You people have forced me around this table too many times.  You
> can''t
> > > fix this thing.  It doesn''t have the capacity to operate.  It can
> > hardly
> > > handle being shut down and turned back on without crashing again.
> > >
> > > Initially, it was the fried modem.  So, in essence, due to the flood,
> I
> > > really didn''t start using this system until November.  It usually
> took
> > me
> > > approximately 4 hours just to TWEAK everything to keep it running just
> > > long enough to maybe answer one letter, because even now I''m fried.
> > >
> > > So, don''t worry, I will not be writing you anymore, only because
> there
> > is
> > > no reason.  Do you understand why that companies are incorporated???
> It
> > > means that the jerk who is the big dog called the CEO cannot be hurt
> > > personally by a lawsuit in terms of his personal assests.  However, I
> > > don''t doubt that in a matter of weeks all the eMachines will be
> coming
> > > off of all the shelves in American in order to truly be looked at, in
> > the
> > > way that I have had to look at every inch of this bitch and if I could
> > > afford it, I would actually throw it in a dumpster with the CD
> attached
> > > and the authenticity number --no I wouldn''t be that cruel.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Jean Graves
> > >
> > > What makes this situation worse, is that I am literally going to go
> rent
> > a
> > > system tomorrow, the irony is not funny.  However, none of my
> creditors
> > > have heard from me and I literally have about 250 pieces of mail to
> get
> > > out and I haven''t been able too.  I had intended on learning how to
> > build
> > > web sites this year in order to broaden my skills and my business.
> But,
> > > like I said, I''m too burnt out by the time I get the damn thing just
> > > working half way right.  I quit loading other software, other than
> > Norton,
> > > probably 5 months ago.  It was too much trouble.  I''ve needed to use
> > the
> > > Internet desparately in order to find a place to live, etc., but . . .
> > > Hey, I couldn''t.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>