This
is a cumulative rubric. You must show all traits of each category in order to
check it.
|
Elements |
Poor 1 |
Ok 2 |
Good 3 |
Excellent 5 |
|
Has
20 poems or equivalent |
I
only have half of my poems. |
I
have 15 or more poems. |
I
have my twenty poems. |
Not
only do I have twenty poems, but they are well-chosen and appropriate. |
|
Has
5 poems on visual presentation |
I
only have 3 poems. |
I
only have 4 poems. |
I
have my 5 poems in my visual.. |
The
poems I used in my visual are well-chosen. |
|
Has
biography in own words |
My
biography has several grammar errors. |
I
have my biography. |
I
have my biography synthesized form several sources. |
I
have a well-written synthesis of several biographical sources. |
|
Has
pictures of poet, etc |
My
photos or visual devices are not relevant. |
I
have several photos, but some are irrelevant. |
I
have several photos, but they seem a little mismatched. |
I
have several photos and visual devices that are appropriate. |
|
Has
analyzed at least two poetic devices in the poem |
I
have made analyses of two poetic devices, but I have errors that mislead the
reader. |
I
have made analyses of two poetic devices, but they are not easy to
understand. |
I
have made mostly effective analyses of at least two poetic devices, but some
are not easy to understand. |
I
have made effective analyses of at least two poetic devices and they are easy
for the viewer to understand. |
|
Has
hotlist of web sites used |
I
have very little to turn in as a hotlist. |
I
can retrace some of my research. |
I
can retrace my research, but others may not understand my web site summaries. |
I
can effectively retrace my research, and someone else could use it
effectively. |
|
Neatness |
My
visual has been slammed together. It looks rushed. |
My
visual has errors and placement is random. |
My
visual is mostly neat, has no errors, and placement of elements seem somewhat
random. |
My
visual is very neat, has no errors, and placement of elements are effective. |
|
Creativity |
My
project was slammed together. I gave little thought to arrangement, color,
etc. |
My
project is straight forward. I
have done nothing to make my presentation
stand out. |
My
project is straight forward. I have done little to make my presentation stand
out. |
My
visual is innovative and has good color and angular presentation. |
|
Oral
Presentation |
I
did it. It’s better than a zero. |
My
oral presentation was “off-the-cuff.” It lacked clarity at times. My audience
knows little about my author or why I did my visual the way I did. |
My
oral presentation was thorough. I held the audience’s attention. I was
well-prepared and my audience understands some of why I did my visual the way
I did. |
My
oral presentation was well-thought out. I dazzled the audience. They will
want to learn more about my author and why I made my visual project the way I
did. |
|
Timeliness |
I
am not ready to go! |
I
am ready to go when it is my turn. |
I
am ready to go on the due date. |
I
am eager and ready to go on the due date. |
|
RAW
SCORE: |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL x 2: |
|
|||