©Lúcio Mascarenhas, Feb 24, 2008
See also:
- http://www.geocities.com/livrant/against-ed-howard.html Against Ed Howard
- http://www.geocities.com/livrant/heresy_of_lefebvrism.html The Heresy of Lefebvrism
- http://www.geocities.com/livrant/lefebvrist_quotes.html Lefebvrist Quotes Proving Heresy
- http://www.geocities.com/livrant/general-post-2-lefebvrist-list.html General Defense of Sedevacantism Against Lefebvrist Heretics
- http://www.geocities.com/livrant/against-vin-lewis.html Against the Feeneyite Heretic Vin Lewis
I have been warning would-be Christians since 1993-1994 of the danger from the sect and cult of Marcel Lefebvre, one of the most dangerous sects that has infiltrated the Catholic Resistance in order to ambush souls fleeing from the Roman Modernists. As such, the Lefebvrists act as the second front of Satan. |
This Catholic Church: H.H. Pope Michael I | Return to the Catholic Church | Pope Michael's Blog | The Pope Speaks | VaticanInExile Mailing Lists | Catholic Research Library | Pope Paul IV, 1559: Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio | Cum Ex Retained | Cum Ex Today | Campion's Brag (Coming up!) |
From Matthew: Dec 11, 2007, 2:33 pm
Look at how mad he got when I threw a very logical argument at him.
Matthew's "very logical argument" is the same old garbage that has been refuted again and again (see below) despite which, the shameless dogs keep on returning to their vomit!!!
It's true - if I was standing here defending "my wife is the pope" and he was defending "pope" michael - we'd be using the same arguments. We'd both be against pretty much everyone, detached from reality, bitter, etc.
Matthew's strategy, typical of heretics: When you cannot disprove, resort to Gobbelsian lies!!!
And what can he say to that? He just gets super upset and LITERALLY curses me!
Do you know that it's a mortal sin to curse someone in the state of grace? Cursing is not to be done lightly. If there is ANY CHANCE the person is in the state of grace, you must not curse them.
The Church has always cursed heretics, and ordinary Christians have always cursed, and been taught to accurse, malicious heretics and malefactors. If they did not, they would be accursed themselves before God. It is a virtue always, to curse the enemies of Christ. Christ Himself commanded that when a community acts maliciously and rebuffs His Gospel, His messenger should dust of the dust from his feet and call down the curse of God upon that community, promising that Sodom and Gommorrah will have things easier in the Day of Judgment than that community; this is precisely what I have done, in obedience to Christ.
St. Paul the Apostle wrote to the Galatians: "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so now I say again: If any one preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be accursed." St. Paul also cursed the Corinthian who commited incest (1 Cor. v, 1). Likewise, Gavin Dunbar, Archbishop of Glasgow famously cursed the Great Curse, a very comprehensive curse, in 1524, the border raiders of the Scottish Marches. This Great Curse was typical of the Church's orthodox thinking at all times, and is exactly what God requires faithful Christians to do to malicious heretics and murderers of souls such as the Lefebvrists in general, and Matthew in particular.
Catholics have always been warned against the Sin of Presumption. St. Paul warned, "Let he who thinks himself to stand, beware, lest he falls." Here we have the heretic Matthew indulging in precisely the Sin of Presumption, pretending to be in a state of grace, and this immediately after maliciously repeating debunked nonsensical difficulties against the Holy Father!!!
If this man does not deserve to be accursed, who does?
I'm talking about actual curses, too - as in wishing evil, etc. I'm not talking about rude or rough language.
MatthewMatthew Dec 11, 2007, 2:28 pm
Well, I can ban you, but I don't have a subscription list.
If anyone was wondering if "pope" michael was pope, I think that they are pretty sure now. You are so bitter and upset, perhaps you should cut your losses, admit that you bet on the wrong horse, and start attending a normal Catholic church as opposed to a wacko cult.
Yes, of course, I too must join your Satanic, diabolic, accursed sect, betraying Christ and becoming His enemy! I must become a heretic like you, one who pretends that an ordinary, orthodox Catholic cannot become Pope, but that a public and manifest heretic can! Pray together with those who affirm with Vatican II that there is a fellowship between Christ and Belial, between Light and Darkness! No thanks, no can do!
MatthewLucio Mas. Dec 11, 2007, 6:33 am
You are just another heretic and hypocrite like every other follower of Marcel Lefebvre's idiotic sect-cum-cult I have met. And you are also a coward and a fraud, who plays the clown in order to cover up for your inability to refute my arguments, a coward who abuses his ownership of this forum to censor statements that exposes you as the serpent and whitewashed sepulchure that you are, Neo-Pharisee.
I have no patience for cowardly and hypocritical Satanists, and I refuse to be part of your joke against Christ: I shake off the dust of my slippers from this village of idiots, calling down the curse of Christ upon you.
Remove me from your subscription list with immediate effect.
Matthew Dec 10, 2007, 9:13 pm
You know, that argument is pretty weak.
I could elect my wife as Pope, and be her only "follower" and use the same arguments people like Pope Michael use:
A very interesting, though inadvertant, admission that. If you can consider "electing your wife as Pope", it can only mean that you believe that women can lawfully be ordained priests and consecrated bishop. Thank you for that confession!!!!
Our Lord said, "when the Son of Man returns, will he find, think ye, faith upon the earth."
and talk about the smallness of the remnant, use quotes like "if everyone else jumped off a bridge, would you?" and bring up the general stupidity of any mob.
But guess what? Sometimes there's a REASON why most intelligent/holy/(insert virtue here) people don't follow someone. It's because they're not worth following!
MatthewLucio Mas. Dec 10, 2007, 8:46 pm
Matthew said: The one who lives with his mom?
Yes, the same. Vicar of the Christ who also lived with his Mom. You have a problem with that, dude?
Matthew said: You actually take him seriously? Ok, the guy claims to have 30 followers. Do you HONESTLY BELIEVE that the Church could get that small? Wake up, man!
I AM awake, which is more than can be said for you. If the Holy Father has only thirty followers, he has more than the Church and Christ has very many times in its past. It is only a Satanist, not a Christian, who measures himself against the pleasure of the mob rather than that of Christ. You may jeer all you like, but you only prove that you are not of Christ.
It is a Satanist who, when he cannot refute, will indulge in stupid, un-Catholic personal attacks, attacks which only act as proof that the attacker has no clue whatsoever of what Catholicism is all about.
Regards,
Lucio Mascarenhas, Bombay, India
Secretary for Correspondence to His Holiness Michael I, by the Grace of God, PopeMatthew Dec 10, 2007, 3:19 pm
You got to be kidding me - you're the secretary to "pope" Michael I?
The one who lives with his mom?
You actually take him seriously? Ok, the guy claims to have 30 followers. Do you HONESTLY BELIEVE that the Church could get that small? Wake up, man!
For those of you who haven't been there, here is the pseudo-pope's website: http://www.vaticaninexile.com/PicturesofthePope.html
Matthew
Against the Lefebvrist Heretic, Matthew Nelson, ©Lúcio Mascarenhas, Feb 24, 2008