|
Copywrite May 2001, Sep 2004
The various modern motifs of the fleur des lis have always intrigued me. These have been used widely throughout Christian Europe for the past five hundred years at least and in heraldry. But the origin of the fleur des lis, as a symbol appears to go back to the 10th century BCE.
The natural fleur des lis, or iris flower can be seen to outline two interlaced triangles, which is the form of the Star of David. Interesting. It has been suggested that the square and compass is a crude representation of the interlaced triangles.
That this symbol appears to have come to prominence in Christian Europe during the period of great dogmatism and oppression could be suggestive. Perhaps it was adopted by Christain converts, who saw other symbolism veiled in the image. Some believe that Spanish inquisition was directed by relatively recent converts to Christianity against those who refused to convert. In any event, the fleur des lis is indeed evident throughout Europe. Who inspired the adoption of this symbol, and what meaning they derived seems to be unclear.
Moving to the 'new world', apparently the original flag of the province of Quebec was a Star of David and that was replaced by a fleur des lis. If you consider the composition of urban centres in contemporary Quebec, following the exodus of the 1970s, there is an interesting irony about this symbolism. Most Quebecers likely consider the fleur des lis to be a franco emblem, but it is likely that it has a far wider variety of meanings.
The modern motif used widely throughout the western world, by all Christian denominations, could be seen to form two triangles. One points up, and one points down. These are not interlaced. Interesting.
These same points could be connected in a different way to form a double cross, which is the insignia of a sitting preceptor in a Masonic Knights Templar Preceptory. It is also the insignia worn by some non-Masonic Knights Templars.
What does this tell us about the inter-relationship between the triangles and the cross? Could the passion cross (the single cross) be that of half the fleur des lis? Might that be an incomplete symbol, that requires an inverted cross to make whole? Spanish fleur des lis seem to consist of only the top three petals and not the lower three. Lightness and darkness? Some say that the pre-Christian cults had two messianic persons, who were known as the son of light and the son of darkness respectively.
This is purely speculative and based on a playful interpretation of symbols. It is not suggesting any alternative view of Christianity, but it is suggesting that the fleur des lis is much more than a Christian symbol and that it likely reflects oppression and the resulting veiling of personal belief in previously intolerant times. Any comments?
LJB May 2001
Further thoughts after having considered the Da Vinci Code in relationship with Masonic Ritual (Craft, Ark Mariner, Holy Royal Arch, Knights Templar, and Royal Order of Scotland) and the Holy Bible.
The Da Vinci Code is of course a fictional work and much of what it claims is unsubstantiated. For example, the author makes representation that the disciple on the right of Christ in Da Vinci's last supper painting is Mary M., but as put forth in Choirs of the God, there is evidence that some of Christs disciples practiced self castration as a way to deny their sexuality and become closer to the deity. Of course, the image of a "V" created by Christ and this person (which could simply be a complete young man with delicate features) may well still represent the feminine aspect of deity. Perhaps Da Vinci made himself to be a eunuch. Regardless of its own academic worth, The Da Vinci Code does indeed provide some seeds for further rigorous research. Website on Da Vinci Code
From the time of King David to the exile to Babylon there existed an androgynous union between the masculine and feminine aspects of deity, but it was abruptly destroyed. Those returning from the exile undertook a search for that which was lost. The genuine secrets of a Master Mason may well be to achieve wholeness through uniting the feminine and masculine aspect of deity. and achieve a balance or perfection. That is, to resolve the chaos.
The pentacle is symbolic of that perfection as traced by the planet Venus every eight years across the ecliptic sky; the sacred feminine or divine goddess. The union is further symbolised by two interlaced triangles; that facing up masculine and that facing down feminine.
The Christian fleur des lis typically has larger petals on top than those below, which form a larger masculine triangle than the feminine. Unless difficult and painful lessons are learned by men they will continue this 60/40 sort of subjugation of paternalism. Is this symbolic of the subjugation of women throughout the Piscean era? Are we moving into a more balanced fleur des lis, perhaps reflected better by some Bhuddist symbolism?
Perhaps the secret of a Master Mason is to recognise and acknowledge the androgynous balanced union of the masculine with the feminine deities. In the Ark Mariner degree, prior to the Candidate being admitted a "blade triangle" is flipped to form a "chalice triangle" for him to explore. In other words, it appears to me that the masculine world is temporarily put aside for the Candidate to experience the feminine world. Very few Freemasons bother with the Ark Mariner degree (a shame because it enables better understanding of Holy Royal Arch symbolism).
Having done this it is necessary for men to get in touch with their inner selves and become active there. The sort of self-development lessons that must be learned are best presented and experienced through allegory and symbolism. This can be done in many ways by working in the context of myth - Freemasonry provides one option to do this. The First three degrees provide an introduction, the Holy Royal Arch degrees provide the true initiation, and the Knights Templar degree enjoins the candidate to understand himself. (Note: Those interested in self castration will not find that in Freemasonry.)
Of course, this is my interpretation and is in no way a doctrine or dogma of Freemason. Why? There are no such established doctrines or dogmas in Freemasonry. Each Freemason is free to think for himself and evolve as he is led through life and the inspiration of God.
LJB Sep 2004
Danny offers the following:
Indeed, both views of the fleur-de-lis have been used as the national
symbol of Hebrews/Israelites/Jews since very ancient times.
At one time, the French royal family, in an attempt to gain
international royal influence, invented an imaginary story and claimed
to be the successors of Jesus, and therefore, the successors of David,
King of Israel. Since then, the side view of the fleur-de-lis has been
used by the French to symbolize France's royal family and later the
country of France.
In parallel, the English have also invented quite a similar imaginary
story, claiming again that the English royal family are the successors
of Jesus, and therefore, the successors of David, King of Israel.
It's not surprising that two so competitive and close European royal
families tried to gain advantage over the other in an attempt to
conquer the world with a fabricated ancient royal lineage
justification, using religion as a tool. Amazingly, there're still
credules in both those countries fanatically believing in those old
jokes.
How exactly the lily became fleur-de-lis (side view) and the
six-pointed star (David's Shield) (top view) is probably the
observation and creativity of ancient artists.
By the way, there was also a European claim that the six-pointed star
used by the Jews was not ancient and was in use only in Europe. All
recent archaelogical findings in Israel are proving the opposite and
clearly showing the antiquity of both symbols and their wide use as a
national symbol of Israel.
According to the tradition and the Kabbalists, the basis of the
six-pointed star (David's Shield) is solely the two oppositely situated
triangles. Of course, we can see many other forms in there by
connecting any other two lines, but that's just not the point.
Danny (?) May 2001
|