Posted by Berkowitz [LarryJones] on April 08, 1999 at 11:00:18 {vxsc0.TBNkcSiIP7aTwAsCjlx2N9cY}:
The previous message was sent, however, there was a mistake made. There is no claim that Jerusalem fell in 568BCE, but in 587 or 586BCE. Thus 568BCE should read "587BCE." Thanks.... Please ignore previous message. Moderator - delete
if you wish.
Berkowitz
========================================
Based upon the most important two astronomical texts ever, it has now been confirmed that Jerusalem fell not in 607BCE or 568BCE, but in 529BCE!
PLEASE UPDATE YOUR RECORDS!