***Common Sense Argument


[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ HOURGLASS2 ARCHIVES ]

Posted by J.H. [JH] on April 03, 1999 at 02:28:25 {Ed9c7782HMHSG.vl05doHR5JhS9/hc}:

In Reply to: **Common Sense Argument posted by Gary on April 02, 1999 at 16:41:15:

: But if you saw a pyramid would you presume it randomly created itself? Of course not, certain things suggest intelligent DESIGN...at least to some of us.

Exactly. The pyramids haveunnatural form, that is, straigh lines and geometric shapes that we very, very rarely find as the result of natural processes.

That's how we distinguish between a house (designed) and a tree (undesigned). When creationists turn around and claim that the tree is also created, they demolish their own argument. If everything is designed, there is no example in the universe of an undesigned thing, and thus the "common sense" argument "from design" is faulty.



Follow Ups:


[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ HOURGLASS2 ARCHIVES ]

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1