Posted by further argument ... [LomadEvreet] on March 30, 1999 at 22:32:52 {.Oe37V.qjQ0hi4VK0MIQPXVCzerRDo}:
In Reply to: a few thoughts on 5/1 /99w posted by felix a on March 29, 1999 at 20:38:56:
felix,
Most certainly, I appreciate your thoughts on intellectual freedom. There are many philosophical arguments to support the essence of your opinion.
I would argue that the quote by JJ Rousseau is implying a physical liberty -- vs. an absolute intellectual freedom. The civil liberties of humans have been violated throughout history by many forms of government. If a man is in "chains" -- he is still free -- intellectually, no one has the power to take that freedom from a person's mind (Rom. 8). Paul himself was an "ambassador in chains."
Your points: "I would contend that intolerance is fought by education, teaching others that there is more than one viewpoint available. ... and allow the
opinions and ideas of others to be heard and stand on their own merit just as we want
our own ideas to be treated."
I assume that by this you are referring to the "rank and file" witness being unable or unwilling to express a dissenting opinion in a public forum. I personally know of some (in good standing, I might add!) who have done just this.
You add: "The relationship of the rank and file members of Jehovah's Witnesses with the Governing Body and therefore the published material produced by the WBTS fits the pattern of a student with their teacher."
Not quite. The argument for academic or philosophical debate within a spiritual body is weak for a few reasons. First, a "supernatural power" HAS stepped in. IF, the bible is to be viewed an absolute authority, THEN, arguing against its principles is not debate, but rebellion (Samuel's account of "obedience vs. sacrifice").
You quote Russell (NOT Charles
T.), ""The fundamental argument for freedom of opinion is the doubtfulness of all our beliefs. If we certainly knew the truth, there would be something to be said for teaching it. But in that case it could be
taught without invoking
authority, by means of its inherent reasonableness."
A person of faith does not doubt their beliefs. The majority of JWs believe they do "certainly know the truth" -- in which case there IS something to be said for teaching it. The authority invoked is biblical and divine.
Just a few of my own differing opinions to your position -- exercising my freedom to disagree!
Best,
-- 'lomad 'eevreet