Posted by Gary [GLamotta] on March 30, 1999 at 06:11:30 {.Oe37V.qjQMRXA6xmpscboLUiPtahc}:
In Reply to: *COJ, DELTA-T. SAVING 479BC-P1 posted by COJ on March 30, 1999 at 05:20:02:
Hi Carl,
I can't believe this! You're refusing to comment (not that there is any need) on the DELTA-T issue?
Carl, it was YOU who begged me again and again to give you this information.
Do you remember this? From your original ANSTEY'S CHRONOLOGY IS DEAD:
"YOUR IMPOSSIBLE DELTA-T VALUE
You have never disclosed your Delta-T value
and how you have arrvied at it,
although we
have repeatedly asked you about it."
So now, Carl, at your request, what do I do,
I give you what you asked for, my delta-T
value adjustments and what do you say!
You refuse to discuss it now.
Well,
that's fine with me. It just confirms
that probably my calculations are right on the
money after all. I'll wait to see if A.F.
has some adjustments, I'm not sure everything
was done correctly.
But it was you who asked for
this information,
I had you in mind when I prepared it, and you
said you requested ti "REPEATEDLY" and had
accused me of basically avoiding the issue.
Now that I've complied, you're upset?
So, sorry, I guess I just can't win
with you,
eh?
Cheers,
Gary