Posted by WW [WW] on March 29, 1999 at 15:16:20 {m1EPSMpKF.gGLv453Gx2MWDOfSZqlzZ0U}:
In Reply to: ***1914 Exposed as False posted by Cygnus on March 28, 1999 at 15:35:03:
Hy Cyg,
From the original article:
Yet they ignore the fact the Christ never sat on Jehovah's throne in
Jerusalem. They ignore the fact that he died and was raised as a spirit
being and was no longer a man of flesh. In doing
this they also make the two
objects in their model to differ from each other; the first, in their model,
was the last king of Israel, and a man of sinful flesh; the second, Christ,
was a spirit being. So in addition to having two
objects in their model,
they also have objects that are not equal. In short, their model, with its
two objects does not match the model in Daniel 4. What their so-called
greater fulfillment really does is to equate Jesus Christ
with the kings of
Israel; it also equates the heavenly kingdom to the earthly kingdom. We know
that the object (Nebuchadnezzer) in Daniel 4 received back the same kingdom
that was taken from him. This is clearly not the case with
the invented 1914
model.
I believe he is saying that the two ideas are not logical and don't match up, Daniel 4 and the 1914 enthronement or coming to power.
WW