5-1-99 still trying

Posted by 1 on March 25, 1999 at 14:52:12 {MWPouNhOWEamQ}:

hot off the press

nice lead article on "FREEDOM"

yep all folks want to be free

i will say no more about an org that doesn't allow you to freely disagree with material that is not even INSPIRED

s====

now i finally see why the wt changes so much

pg 8 paragraph 3

dealing with "new light" on the disgusting thing

"In the last few years, THE WATCHTOWER has clarified yet further THEIR VIEW now let's consider the implications of this statement

1. if the now old light was from god as claimed by jw why does god need new light,

did he get it wrong or the BIW.

you see this is the problem jw run into

they will claim that this new understanding aka INTERPETATION

is new light from God and he has cleared things up,

well a few yrs back they were also told that god cleared things up with the last understanding on the issue.

ROUND AND ROUND THEY GO

you see you can't keep claiming that god is clearing stuff up for YOU AND AT THE SAME TIME CLAIM HE GAVE YOU THE LAST INFO

if you do

then you must admit he got it wrong the last time.

2. or

is it really just like they said, this is OUR VIEW

now who is "OUR"

WE ALL KNOW IT'S not the rank and file jw,

so the "OUR" view is no more than the opiinion of the
BOYS IN WRITING.

NOW IF they are giving thier opinion and then say thier opinion is NOT INSPIRED

then they are doing no more than bible commmentary like any other biblical researcher

the difference with the boys in writng is after they give "thier view"

they then turn around and tell you they were directed by god to come to that view

but then a few yrs later we learn that the view was wrong

so one must ask did god really direct them to the old view to begin with

the boys in writing want to have thier cake and eat it too

on one hand

they don't want to directly claim INSPIRATION which will then give then the right to demand no one question them,

but instead they make a half baked claimed

so it is clear then

that thier opinion really carries no more weight than the next guy who gives his opinion and gets it WRONG

just think the bible is 1000s yrs old
and constant

yet wt has a shelf life less than a quart of milk

they just need to go ahead and join the other
bible researchers who give thier opinion on matters and leave that "PROPHET STUFFF"

to the PROS

smile

1

Follow Ups:

*****5-1-99 still trying edgy11 21:33:31 3/25/99 (0)

---

[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ HOURGLASS2 ARCHIVES ]

---

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws