*Watchtower's Flawless Teaching


[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ HOURGLASS2 ARCHIVES ]

Posted by Cyg shaking head... on March 22, 1999 at 08:45:24 {MW9.1Uh1V91ko}:

In Reply to: Watchtower's Flawless Teaching posted by Charlotte on March 21, 1999 at 22:58:54:

Fact: "Charlotte" is a troll who doesn't understand the meaning of the word proof

: The Watchtower's teachings are 100% Biblical,

So are the Christadelphians. But the Christadelphians differ on a number of theological issues. I wonder why that is if they are both 100% Bible based?

: and the Bible's teachings are 100% flawless.

The Bible contains very few absolute teachings. People interpret the Bible to teach this or that, but the Bible merely contains words of persons who were addressing a particular audience.

: Conclusion: the Watchtower's teaching is flawless.

There is very little Watchtower teaching that can stand up to critical scrutiny.

: The Watchtower has never lied, contrary to accusations from its vehement opposition.
Conclusion: all information in Watchtower published literature is 100% accurate.

Sorry, the Watchtower has demonstrably lied regarding:

* authorites on science and biblical chronology

* the history of the WTS, early beliefs, and organization government

* claims that the Bible, or God, says this-or-that, when in full knowledge that such claims are erroneous

* renderings of certain Bible verses in the NWT, as well as their application

: The Watchtower's chronology is 100% accurate.

: Conclusion: 1914 did mark the beginning of the end, and the chronology calculating this date is scientifically proven.

There is nothing in the Bible to indicate that the seven times of Daniel 4 are 2520 years. There is no (read: ZERO) evidence that Zedekiah was removed from the throne and the last deporation of the Jews occurred in 607BCE. The Society's chronology placing Jesus on the Davidic throne and being present ("arrived") is based on inconclusive assumptions, guesses, "must-be's" and sheer hypocrisy (acceptance of the secularly achieved 539BCE date for Cyrus' first year, but rejection of the stronger evidence supporting 586/7BCE as Nebuchadnezzar's 19th).

: I dare anyone to show flaws in what I have proven in this post.

Done. See you in about six months.


Follow Ups:


[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ HOURGLASS2 ARCHIVES ]

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1